P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Peer to Peer
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-04-20, 07:08 AM   #1
JackSpratts
 
JackSpratts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,013
Default Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - April 11th, ’20

Since 2002































Early Edition



April 11th, 2020
















In the Age of Coronavirus, Even Movie Theaters Learn to Love Streaming
Rebecca Rubin

Greg Laemmle never thought he’d recommend anyone to stream a movie at home. The best way to watch a film, as any theater owner like Laemmle will tell you, is in a darkened cinema with a tub of popcorn at the ready.

But along with atomizing life as we know it, the coronavirus pandemic has entirely disrupted the business of showing motion pictures on the big screen. There’s a great deal of ambiguity over when things will return to normal, and when activities like going to the movies can safely resume. That has forced Laemmle, who runs a family-owned arthouse chain in Los Angeles, and other exhibitors to get innovative to keep their industry alive at a time when they can’t operate conventionally.

“Obviously we are concerned about generating revenue during this period,” Laemmle told Variety.

Those anxieties have propelled some mom-and-pop multiplexes to take an unlikely step in the interim — launching “virtual cinemas” that allow audiences to see first-tier films from the comfort of their couch. For cinephiles who pledge loyalty to their local theaters, it provides an opportunity to financially support a sector of the industry that’s been seriously impacted by the pandemic.

Patrons can purchase a digital ticket, most of which cost around $12, giving them access to a link that is available for a few days. In short, the practice a lot like the streaming and on-demand entertainment that exhibitors have adamantly resisted for the last decade. But given the unprecedented times, theater owners are looking at it as a possible salvation — for now.

“There can be concerns longterm about what message we’re sending. Are we taking customers and turning them into streamers? We figured it was better to maintain a relationship with our patrons and distributors,” Laemmle said wistfully. “I’m not immune to the longterm concerns it presents, but it felt like the right thing to do.”

Alamo Drafthouse, Film Forum and the Angelika are a few of the other theaters testing out the provisional path into digital. Some of the offerings available include Film Movement’s “Corpus Christi,” Robbie Robertson doc “Once Were Brothers” and Oscilloscope’s “Saint Frances.” As with traditional movie stubs, theaters and distributors are splitting proceeds from ticket sales.

In keeping with recent trends, theater owners are even attempting to recreate the same event-like atmosphere that would greet a theatrical release by live-streaming q&a sessions with filmmakers or actors. Alamo Drafthouse also created online substitutes to its signature programming series — Terror Tuesday and Weird Wednesday — and is encouraging people to socialize online following screenings.

“After movies, people hang in the bar or lobby,” said Sarah Pitre, Alamo Drafthouse’s senior director of programming and promotions. “Since they can’t do that anymore, we are going to move that conversation to our website, Birth.Movies.Death., and people can go there to compare notes. That’s as close as we can get to the Alamo experience without having doors open.”

It’s not just exhibitors that are reeling from indefinitely closed multiplexes. Almost every major movie set to release through the middle of summer has been postponed, resulting in an onslaught of tentpoles that need to plant flags back in the calendar. That leaves little room for independent movies to break out when theaters eventually reopen.

For that reason, this temporary model is favorable for film distribution companies such as Magnolia Pictures, Film Movement and Kino Lorber, which all thrive in arthouse spaces. Specialty labels can’t afford the same robust marketing spends as Disney or Universal to boost the profile of an upcoming release, so they rely heavily on support from theaters to entice their loyal consumer bases.

“We really depend upon the cumulative awareness that’s created theater-by-theater,” Kino Lorber CEO Richard Lorber said. “Their [recommendations] have a halo that says it deems spending your time and money on.”

Days before Lorber’s U.S.-based company was gearing up to release “Bacurau,” a Brazilian thriller that won the Cannes Film Festival Jury Prize, theaters in New York City and Los Angeles were ordered to indefinitely close.

“We were dismayed, of course. Hell, we had done so much advanced marketing,” Lorber said. “But creatively, we were spurred to innovation.”

Now, “Bacurau” is available for virtual release via cinemas from Chatham, N.Y. to Seattle, Wash. and over 100 locations in-between.

“We wanted to validate the possibility for the film to perform at some theatrical level, rather than send to iTunes or Netflix,” Lorber said.

Magnolia found itself in a similar position with “Slay the Dragon,” a well-reviewed documentary about gerrymandering in the U.S. Rather than postponing its early April debut or sending it straight to streaming, Magnolia opted to take it virtual theaters in an effort to capitalize on the film’s timeliness.

“We had already completed a lot of press, and making it available to a lot of people at once was the best way forward,” said Neal Block, Magnolia’s head of marketing and distribution. “Timing determined the release plan. It was coming up so fast that we decided with the filmmakers that we didn’t want to hold up the campaign and revisit it later.”

Some exhibitors were skeptical, Block admits, though most were willing to take a chance given the circumstances.

“Theaters seem happy to be able to offer something to keep patrons engaged,” Block said. “The interest was wider than I had anticipated. We offered it to all the theaters we work with, and for the most part, it was really popular.”

Despite social distancing in real life, streaming has been a unique chance for some distributors to interact more directly with customers.

“We so rarely get feedback from moviegoers about films, unless it’s people talking shit on Reddit,” Block said with a laugh. “People seem to want to support the movie theaters they love. To get feedback that’s warm and lovely, it’s been a nice silver lining.”
https://variety.com/2020/film/news/m...as-1203550005/





Several Prestigious Filmmakers Submitted a Lawsuit Against ‘Nitro TV’
Bill Toulas

• ‘Nitro TV’ is in legal trouble, as a group of filmmakers is suing them for millions in damages due to copyright infringement.
• The pirating platform saw an explosion in the number of subscribers lately, and the legal entities noticed this.
• Nitro is offering thousands of movies, series, live TV channels, “catch up” options, and events.

Several moviemakers and TV broadcasters, including Disney, Amazon, Universal, Columbia, and Paramount, have filed a lawsuit against ‘Nitro TV’, accusing the IPTV service of blatant piracy and copyright infringement. They are requesting the payment of millions in damages and the enforcement of injunction measures. This obviously puts Nitro TV in great trouble, as the lawsuit is threatening to take down one of the most popular IPTV platforms out there.

The lawsuit submitted at the U.S. District Court in California identifies a man named “Alejandro Galindo” as the owner and operator of Nitro TV, and also includes another twenty “Doe” defendants. The same person is accused of administrating a Facebook group that had the sole purpose of promoting Nitro TV’s offerings and of luring the audience into subscribing. Thus, the man also stands accused of encouragement towards copyright infringement, in addition to facilitating the action.

The IPTV platform itself used the domain “TekkHosting.com” as its primary interface through which subscribers could sign up and log into the Nitro platform. A second path through which one could access Nitro was via TV box resellers who bought credits from the platform and converted them into user accounts. The typical cost of the subscription was $20/month for two devices. According to the stats presented in the lawsuit, more than 45,000 people activated new accounts on Nitro TV over the last twelve months.

As for what content was offered through Nitro TV, the list is extensive. Thousands of 24/7 channels broadcasting live without any licensing, video-on-demand “catch up” features that give people access to previously aired content, and many hundreds of films. The exhibit includes Toy Story 3, Frozen II, The Godfather, Star Trek, Jurassic World, The Office, Mr. Robot, Men in Black, Karate Kid, Venom, Harry Potter, Joker, Suicide Squad, and many more.

Now, the plaintiffs are requesting the court to consider several statutory damages, going up to $150,000 per infringed work, and for every one of the three causes of action presented. Of course, the coverage of the associated attorney fees is also included in the demands. As the plaintiffs point out, platforms like ‘Nitro TV’ are introducing unfair competition in the market. They are also misleading people into believing that, somehow, they are paying for legitimate services. Thus, the original creators of the broadcasted streams are undermined and financially harmed.
https://www.technadu.com/several-pre...itro-tv/97793/





38 'Piracy' Subreddits You Definitely Shouldn't Visit
David Murphy

You can find just about anything on Reddit, for better or worse. It’s one of the reasons why the site remains so universally popular, as it’s an easy way for newbies to have near-unlimited access to everything that used to be a little harder to find: day-of downloads for new movies, streams of their favourite sporting events, free or modified video games and applications, et cetera.

Gone are the days when you had to hunt down an obscure message board to get access to files you probably shouldn’t have. Now, if you haven’t already bookmarked a popular site like The Pirate Bay in your browser, you can browse one of the many subreddits dedicated to BitTorrents and BitTorrent trackers, direct-linked downloads of whatever it is you’re trying to find, or The Pirate Bay itself. There’s a subreddit for everything, truly.

While we commend Reddit for taking a more active stance against piracy nowadays, it feels like a cat-and-mouse game that the website can’t possibly win. That, or Reddit is playing by a hard-to-read rulebook, since there are a bunch of easy-to-find subreddits that give you pretty wide access to just about anything you want — not just the legal things.

(Lifehacker caveat: Creators should get paid for their work! You should purchase things you want to experience, which supports those who make it. Pirating everything and everything you do is a jerk move, to put it mildly, but there are some instances—an obscure TV show or a live event that you can’t purchase a copy of, for example—where piracy doesn’t feel quite so black and white. Also, we are not the boss of you, so do with the following information what you will.)

Games, Apps, and Books

• /r/piracy

• /r/piratedgames

• /r/megalinks — now defunct, but plenty of archived material

• /r/crackwatch

• /r/torrents

• /r/opendirectories

• /r/invites — ask for invites to your favourite private BitTorrent tracker here

• /r/OpenSignups

• /r/torrentrequests — private, ask for access

• /r/trackers

• /r/scholar — scholarly articles and books

• /r/textbooks

• /r/SwitchNSPs — Nintendo Switch

• /r/PkgLinks — Sony PlayStation consoles

• /r/3dspiracy — Nintendo 3DS

• /r/cemupiracy — Wii U

• /r/APKMODGAMES — Android games

Streaming Movies and TV

• /r/moviesonanything

• /r/fullofmovies

• /r/allucmovies

• /r/fullmoviesonyoutube

• /r/fullmoviesonvimeo

• /r/fullmoviesongoogle

• /r/BestOfStreamingVideo

• /r/Documentaries

• /r/fullanimeonyoutube

• /r/fullcartoonsonyoutube

• /r/FullLengthFilms

Streaming Sports Events

• /r/nflstreams

• /r/CFBStreams

• /r/nbastreams

• /r/ncaaBBallStreams

• /r/MLBStreams

• /r/NHLStreams

• /r/soccerstreams

• /r/MMAStreams

• /r/mmafights

• /r/WWEstreams


Virtual private networks (or VPNs) are great for protecting your privacy and data while you browse the web. They provide increased security on public Wi-Fi networks (coffee shops, airports, etc), and prevent ISPs from collecting personal data, data they want to sell to advertisers. VPNs are also pretty good at letting users circumvent location-based content restrictions put in place by companies like YouTube, Spotify and Netflix. While they're not foolproof, here's how to pick a VPN, and boost your chance of enjoying Game Of Thrones without paying Foxtel a dime.

There’s one quick Reddit trick you can use to quickly find movies, TV shows, and other videos to download—especially if your favourite subreddit for such things gets shut down or dies out. Click on Reddit’s search bar and type in “site:” followed by any kind of popular domain for less-savoury items: “openload.co” for videos, for example, or “mega.co.nz” for files.

While you might not find a specific video you’re looking on the search results listing that appears, you’ll probably get an idea of which subreddits have a lot of active postings about these sorts of things. Follow them, and you’ll have a new source of less-than-legal things until Reddit shuts that subreddit down—if it ever does.
https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2020/0...il-subreddits/





University Libraries Offer Online “Lending” of Scanned In-Copyright Books

Books are only available to patrons of participating university libraries.
Timothy B. Lee

The coronavirus crisis has forced the closure of libraries around the world, depriving the public of access to millions of printed books. Books old enough to be in the public domain may be available for free download online. Many recent books are available to borrow in e-book form. But there are many other books—especially those published in the mid-to-late 20th century—that are hard to access without going to a physical library.

A consortium of university libraries called HathiTrust recently announced a solution to this problem, called the Emergency Temporary Access Service. It allows participating HathiTrust member libraries to offer their patrons digital scans of books that they can "check out" and read online.

HathiTrust has a history of pushing the boundaries of copyright. It was the defendant in a landmark 2014 ruling that established the legality of library book scanning. At the time, HathiTrust was only allowing people with print disabilities to access the full text of scanned books. Now HathiTrust is expanding access to more people—though still with significant limits.

The program is only available to patrons of member libraries like the Cornell library. Libraries can only "lend" as many copies of the book as it has physical copies on its shelves. Loans last for an hour and are automatically renewed if a patron is still viewing a book at the hour's end. If you want to read a book that's currently in use by another patron, you have to wait until they're finished.

These limits distinguish HathiTrust's service from another recently announced "emergency library." Two weeks ago, the Internet Archive announced it was offering the general public the opportunity to check out 1.4 million scanned books. During the pandemic, the Internet Archive isn't limiting the number of people who can "borrow" a book simultaneously.

Cornell University legal scholar James Grimmelmann tells Ars that the limits on the HathiTrust program will put the group in a stronger position if it is ever challenged in court. The same fair use doctrine that allows HathiTrust to scan books in the first place might also justify what the organization is doing now—though that's far from certain.

A key factor in fair use analysis is the effect of a new use on the market for the original work. HathiTrust can argue that its lending program will have minimal impact on the market for new books because it is merely giving existing patrons access to the same books they could access before the pandemic struck.

"The HathiTrust member libraries all had paper copies. Those copies could circulate freely within the university community in person. The pandemic has closed the physical campuses," Grimmelmann wrote in an email to Ars. "The ETAS mimics physical circulation in many important ways: distribution is limited to the university community, only one patron has access at a time, there is no easy way to make and keep copies of whole books, and the program ends when the pandemic ends and physical access is restored."
The result, Grimmelmann argues, is a "close nexus" between the access patrons enjoyed before the pandemic and the access they enjoy now. That might cause the courts to look favorably on HathiTrust's approach.

Authors and publishers reacted with fury to the Internet Archive's unlimited online lending program. And prior to the pandemic, leading authors' groups weren't happy about "controlled digital lending" programs that tried to duplicate the effects of physical lending in the online realm. But while the legality of HathiTrust's emergency lending program is an open question, copyright holders may be reluctant to challenge it in court now. Not only would filing a lawsuit in the middle of a pandemic risk a public backlash, but there's also a risk that they could lose, legitimizing controlled digital lending in the process.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...pyright-books/





Anti-Piracy Copyright Lawyer Decides To Abuse Trademarks To Shut Down Pirates
Timothy Geigner

One of the most consistent aspects of lawyers who crusade against copyright infringement is just how inconsistent their views on "the law" are. Copyright trolls regularly skirt the law while claiming to fight for justice for copyright holders. Hell, some trolls, that would have you believe they are bullwarks against piracy, have been found out to have essentially committed and encouraged the very piracy they sued over themselves.

The point is that it's all a panoply of monied interests and shifting levels of ethics perfectly calibrated to let the copyright lawyer do as he or she pleases on any given day. You can see this in practice yet again, with Kerry Culpepper, Hawaiian IP attorney, deciding to register a bunch of trademarks for piracy related terms and then going around and shutting down accounts for "pirate" services on social media sites.

Through the recently incorporate Hawaiian company 42 Ventures, he helped to register several piracy-related trademarks. The current trademark portfolio of the company includes the popular brands “YTS,” “Popcorn Time,” and “Terrarium.” In addition, 42 Ventures also claimed the trademark for the Showbox arrow logo. All trademarks are registered under the same description, “downloadable computer software for downloading and streaming multimedia content images, videos and audio.” The same description also applies to the pirate sites and apps.

The trademarks were only recently registered which brings up the issue of prior use. Popcorn Time, Terrarium, and YTS have been using their brands for years, and could technically object to any enforcement efforts. 42 Ventures, however, stresses that it has its own legal “Popcorn Time” website at Popcorntime4u.com, which links to content from the YouTube channel Popcorned Planet.


And from there, we find that 42 Ventures has partnered with Andy Signore, who is behind Honest Trailers, among other things. The idea I suppose is to try to claim that 42 Ventures is suddenly and recently using these marks in commerce, the only way it would have a valid trademark. That, however, is bullshit. The terms and actual content creators were already long using those marks, as were the holders of the social media accounts 42 Ventures is busy taking down. In other words, Culpepper appears to be perfectly willing to abuse trademark law in his efforts to enforce copyright law. That isn't exactly a consistent respect for intellectual property now, is it?

Culpepper has also found his way onto our pages before. Last time we saw him, he had accused a 72 year old man of pirating over a thousand movies on the internet... only to drop that accusation when the media got wind of it and interviewed the bewildered elderly gentleman. This, again, shows an inconsistency in the application of the law. Either the evidence used against a 70 year old, the same evidence used against plenty of others, was sound or it wasn't. If it was, why drop the accusation? If it wasn't, why use it elsewhere?

Because consistent and ethical application of the law is entirely besides the point. There's no respect for intellectual property in any of this. Only a way to milk dollars in the name of the law.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...-pirates.shtml





Verizon is Canceling Home Internet Installations During the Pandemic

‘We are minimizing our in-home installation work to critical needs’
Jay Peters

Verizon is canceling scheduled appointments for internet installation and repairs, according to some customers and two Verge reporters with persistent internet issues. The decision potentially leaves Fios subscribers without wired internet at a time when they’re likely relying on it for work and to see friends and family during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We are minimizing our in-home installation work to critical needs to keep our employees and customers safe and to reduce the spread of COVID-19,” Verizon says in a support document.
"“We are minimizing our in-home installation work to critical needs.”"

“To reduce the spread of COVID-19 and keep our employees and customers safe, we are making every attempt to perform work without going into homes or small businesses and are limiting in-home installs to medical emergencies and critical installations,” Verizon tells The Verge in a statement. Self-install options are also available for “qualified service orders,” the company added.

However, Verizon actually changed the language in the support document sometime on Tuesday morning, according to Business Insider. Previously, the site said that “our technicians will not be able to enter your home or business to install new services or to do repair work.”

Here is the previous language, from a version of the page archived on Monday:

As a result of COVID-19, we are taking precautions to keep our employees and customers safe. At this time, our technicians will not be able to enter your home or business to install new services or to do repair work. Qualified orders will be provided self-install options, or you may proceed with placing an order for a technician-required installation and it will be held for future appointment priority. You will receive notification to select an installation date when we resume operations.

Users on Twitter have reported that their installation appointments have been canceled. One said yesterday that his installation appointment was canceled for internet that he needed for school. In a reply, Verizon said its “technicians will not be able to enter your home to install new services or do repair work.”

As a result of COVID-19, we are taking precautions to keep our employees and customers safe. At this time, our technicians will not be able to enter your home to install new services or do repair work.
— Verizon Support (@VerizonSupport) April 6, 2020

Earlier today, Verizon told a customer who said their installation appointment was canceled that “qualified orders will be provided self-install options” and that he would get “future appointment priority” if he opted for installation by a technician.

Qualified orders will be provided self-install options, or you may proceed with placing an order for a technician-required installation and it will be held for future appointment priority. You will receive notification to select an installation date when we resume operations
^CKM
— Verizon Support (@VerizonSupport) April 7, 2020

Some Twitter users have reported that Verizon is telling them that a technician might fix their internet in November, but Verizon said in reply to one of those users that the November date is “incorrect” and is “simply a placeholder for customers in your area.”

Jass, that information is incorrect. That date is simply a placeholder for customers in your area. We will contact you once we receive clearance to provide an earlier date. Thank you.
^HEN
— Verizon Support (@VerizonSupport) April 1, 2020

Verizon’s new policies have also affected reporters here at The Verge. Science reporter Loren Grush hasn’t had internet from Verizon since April 1st. A technician came to her apartment that day to investigate, but they said an engineering technician needed to look at the problem and potentially do a repair. The engineering technician’s appointment was scheduled for yesterday, but they never showed up. Verizon told Grush there was a new protocol implemented on April 6th that meant technicians could no longer come into her home.

“I tried calling today but essentially was told ‘engineering will call you,’” Grush said in a Slack message. “We have to wait for them to call us, and since this new rule is in place, I’m not entirely hopeful.”

In the meantime, Grush and her husband have been forced to rely on their mobile hotspots for internet, which they need for their work right now. She says she almost hit her mobile data cap, while her husband had to pay to add a higher data cap. “I’m worried [that] once we hit the caps, the internet will be unusable,” said Grush.

Makena Kelly, a policy reporter at The Verge, has also been experiencing problems with her Fios internet since April 1st. A technician was scheduled to check on the problem on April 4th, but the internet returned, so Verizon canceled the appointment, she said in a Slack message. The internet went out again later that day, and Kelly hasn’t been able to reschedule an appointment.

To help customers fix issues that don’t need a technician to visit in person, Verizon tells The Verge that it’s piloting “a virtual assistant tech tool that allows our field technicians to interact with customers via real time, interactive video chat.” The company has not responded to questions from The Verge about how big that pilot is or when it might roll out more broadly.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/7/21...intment-cancel





Dr Drew Supercut Downplaying COVID-19 Gets YouTube Copyright Takedown

Celebrity doctor apologized after harsh criticism of his dismissive attitude towards the pandemic during its early stages
Jeremy Fuster

Dr. Drew Pinsky is using copyright claims to remove a video compilation of his past comments in which he downplays the seriousness of the coronavirus pandemic, acccording to HuffPost contributor Yashar Ali.

On social media, Pinsky’s critics have shared a video containing multiple clips of the media personality saying that fears of COVID-19 were overblown. The clips were taken from Pinsky’s podcast and media appearances in February and early March, including an appearance on KTLA News in Los Angeles on March 2, when he called it a “press-induced panic.”

The video went viral after it was shared by Ali, who noted that the original video on YouTube has been taken down after Pinsky’s company issued a copyright claim.

Representatives for Pinsky and YouTube did not immediately respond to TheWrap’s requests for comment.

On Saturday, Pinsky released a video on social media apologizing for his previous comments, which included a claim that one’s chances of dying of the coronavirus are worse than being “hit by an asteroid.” He said that he made a mistake in comparing COVID-19 to the flu without looking at the severity of the disease.

“My early comments about equating coronavirus with influenza were wrong. They were incorrect. I was part of a chorus that was saying that. And we were wrong. And I want to apologize for that,” he said.

“I did not, thank goodness, get Dr. [Anthony] Fauci wrong, and when he made it clear that this was not a usual influenza, that it was significantly worse, I adjusted course. And if you notice, I’ve been doing about two hours of media today backing, changing my perspective in such a way to sign on for the aggressive measures we are taking.”

To date, over 67,000 deaths — roughly 9,100 in the U.S. — related to coronavirus have been reported with 1.25 million confirmed cases.
https://www.thewrap.com/dr-drew-supe...ight-takedown/

















Until next week,

- js.



















Current Week In Review





Recent WiRs -

April 4th, March 28th, March 21st, March 14th

Jack Spratts' Week In Review is published every Friday. Submit letters, articles, press releases, comments, questions etc. in plain text English to jackspratts (at) lycos (dot) com. Submission deadlines are Thursdays @ 1400 UTC. Please include contact info. The right to publish all remarks is reserved.


"The First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public."
- Hugo Black
__________________
Thanks For Sharing
JackSpratts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 16th, '11 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 13-07-11 06:43 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 9th, '11 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 06-07-11 05:36 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 30th, '10 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 27-01-10 07:49 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 16th, '10 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 13-01-10 09:02 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - December 5th, '09 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 02-12-09 08:32 AM






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)