P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Peer to Peer
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology!

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-08-02, 09:08 PM   #1
JackSpratts
 
JackSpratts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,018
Default "The New Napsters" - Fortune Magazine Covers Peer-To-Peer

By Melanie Warner
August 2002, FORTUNE

To the big record labels, Napster wasn't just a nuisance; it was their worst
nightmare--the online equivalent to everyone storming into record stores and making off with armfuls of CDs. So when an appeals court issued an order last July forcing Napster to shut down, there was a sigh of relief throughout the recording industry. It was the day free music died.

Or so it seemed. Napster as we knew it is gone. But what's taken its place is a lot scarier for the music industry--and perhaps unstoppable. They're called file-sharing services, or P2P networks in geek-speak, and the three most popular ones--Kazaa, Grokster, and Morpheus--have a combined 70 million active users, compared with only 20 million for Napster in its heyday. Oh, and it's not just music being zapped across the Internet anymore. The new Napsters house videogames, software programs, and movies, including ones now playing in theaters.

Not surprisingly, the big labels and the movie industry are trying to do to Kazaa, Grokster, and Morpheus what they did to Napster--litigate them out of existence. Only this time the outlaw networks may not be so easy to shut down. Kazaa, Grokster, and Morpheus work much the same way Napster did, but they're technologically smarter and, in a legal sense, a lot more amorphous. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), representing eight record labels, and the Motion Picture Association, working on behalf of 19 movie studios, are suing the companies that own Kazaa, Grokster, and Morpheus--Sharman Networks, Grokster, and StreamCast Networks, respectively. (All three deny the charges.) But those entities don't run their networks the way, say, Sony does its record label; they have little control over what they created and can't tell who's downloading what file, whether it's an Eminem song or Grandma's recipe for blueberry pie. Thus the legal question becomes: If you can't control or see illegal activity, how can you be liable for it? In a memo leaked last December, the RIAA's legal team acknowledged that its claims against Kazaa, Grokster, and Morpheus "are not as strong as those against Napster."
http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?...&doc_id=208834

- js.
JackSpratts is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)