|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
13-10-08, 05:55 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
Yes, I'd advise U to do that.
As normal, you have your head tight up inside U're arse.
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
14-10-08, 01:39 AM | #2 | |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
Say Three Hail Marys and go to the corner for an hour.
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
|
14-10-08, 06:43 AM | #3 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,018
|
nic isn't political so he's not offering ideas or solutions. he simply will not tolerate criticism of the united states, especially from furinerz. remember poor miss_silver? she learned the hard way. but it's nothing personal. he just loves his country so much.
when barack is running america nic will be just as tough on president obama's critics. won't you nic? you'll see. |
14-10-08, 08:30 AM | #4 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Judge Stephen J. Murphy:GOP's voter purge a 'violation of federal law'
The American Civil Liberties Union is trumpeting a judge's decision in Michigan which brings to a halt the practice of eliminating voters from rolls if their mailing address is found to be invalid. Recently, the GOP chairman in Macomb County, Michigan, detailed a plan to use a list of foreclosed homes to challenge voters. His pronouncement drew an immediate backlash, with predictions that the plan would "backfire." It has. The suit, filed by ACLU national and ACLU of Michigan, along with the Advancement Project, aimed to protect voters whose registration cards were returned to government offices by post as 'undeliverable.' Judge Stephen J. Murphy of the U.S. District Court of Michigan's Eastern District concluded that the program of eliminating these voters from rolls is in violation of federal law. The voter purge program, better known to elections integrity experts as 'voter caging,' is a long-storied GOP tactic employed against minority, student and low-income voters. In September, the Obama campaign filed a lawsuit in Michigan challenging the illegal tactic. "You essentially send a first-class letter to a hoursehold where you suspect that that person no longer lives there but where they're still registered to vote," explained Allen Raymond, a convicted GOP elections fraudster who spent time in prison after the discovery of a phone-jamming scheme during the 2002 elections. "That letter comes back. ... Somebody [at the local polling place] then challenges that vote if that person comes in to vote." "This is a very significant ruling for Michigan voters," said Matthew Lund, the ACLU cooperating attorney and a partner at Pepper Hamilton LLP who argued the case, in a release. "The court recognized – and repeated several times – that the state of Michigan is conducting unlawful voter purges that clearly violate the National Voter Registration Act. Michigan voters who were removed from the voting rolls for no reason other than failure to receive their ID card in the mail will now be allowed to vote in November.” "More than 1,400 voters in that category have been disqualified so far in 2008," reports the Associated Press. "The judge says it's unclear how many cancellations actually are wrong but it's a violation of federal law. Murphy says those people shouldn't be prevented from voting if they can produce more proof of residency at the polls." "This program has a very detrimental impact in minority, low-income and student communities across Michigan," claims an ACLU advisory. "These communities tend to be more transient and to live in multi-family housing." “This is a major victory for Michigan voters and the integrity of our democratic process,” said Meredith Bell-Platts, staff counsel with the ACLU Voting Rights Project, in a release. “Today’s decision brings us one step closer to restoring confidence in a electoral system that has been poisoned by illegal disfranchisement policies. As a result of the judge’s decision, fewer Michigan voters will be illegally purged and wrongly disfranchised – and that’s good for everyone.” |
14-10-08, 09:18 AM | #5 | ||
Alpha Stoner
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: www.naphoria.com
Posts: 5,121
|
When it comes to voting, the Republicans only have one talking point: ACORN
Acorn registers voters. Sometimes the registrars have targets or 'quotas' to fill to show they are making the effort. Sometimes those registering new voters are either lazy, greedy, or a combo of the two. They have been caught submitting erroneous registrations, multiple registrations, even sitting in a library making shit up. That is all wrong, sure enough, and sometimes fraud, but it means little/nothing to the election. To actually vote you have to prove who you are, so unless someone shows up saying they are 'Mickey Mouse', and can prove it, they ain't votin'. But the Republicans love this stuff and can really get their teeth into it, especially if it drives their voter suppression efforts, and it certainly play to that meme. They LOVE to try to link Obama directly with Acorn and to demonetize him and the Democratic party for any involvement with the group. Involvement with Acorn is, in their view, un-American. Okay then, fair is fair I suppose, even when it isn't, so have at this bastard openly supporting Acorn and other commie groups like Unite Here, SEIU, and PAW no less! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ9wy2MI1NI McCain '08! Š
__________________
|
||
14-10-08, 10:09 AM | #6 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
I think if one more of their accusations gets turned back on them McCain is going to blow a gasket
|
19-10-08, 09:31 AM | #7 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - November 11th, '06 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 09-11-06 10:55 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - November 4th, '06 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 02-11-06 08:19 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - October 28th, '06 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 26-10-06 08:48 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - October 21st, '06 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 3 | 21-10-06 11:48 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - May 8th, '04 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 2 | 06-05-04 06:35 PM |