Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 22nd, '05

[JackSpratts]

U.S Album Sales Up

Global music sales slipped again in 2004, but after four years of declines the record publishers will see the return of growing revenues in 2005 due to online stores and music DVDs, a survey found on Monday.

Hit by piracy, Internet song swappers and saturated markets, music sales fell in 2004 by one percent to $32.1 billion. But 2005 will make up for the damage with a one percent increase, said research group Informa.

Over the next six years, the music publishing industry will return to the $39 billion sales levels last seen between the years 1997 and 2000, before the invention of cheap CD burners and file swapping services such as Napster and KaZaa.

Legal Internet song shops such as iTunes from Apple and Connect from Sony Corp have opened in many countries. The services connect easily to portable music players, such as iPod, which have become very popular.

On-line music has not made big bucks yet, contributing just 0.9 percent of total music revenues last year, but have changed the image of the industry, said Informa analyst Simon Dyson.

"It has made the music industry sexy again," Dyson said.

Online music sales will rise to 8.8 percent of sales by 2010, Informa estimates.

Legal clampdowns on illegal song swappers and the growing popularity of music videos also have a big impact.

Already last year, music video sales, DVDs containing video clips or concerts, rose by an estimated 26.3 percent to $2.7 billion. It was not enough to prevent the overall decline as audio- only sales fell in 2004 by 2.9 percent to $29.4 billion.

This year, music video sales will rise again, by 17.6 percent, against a backdrop of stable audio-only sales.

"Music videos are a new catalyst for growth, just like CD was a new catalyst when it came out," Dyson said, recalling that the introduction of the CD eventually trebled sales of the record industry from around $12 billion in the early 1980s.

Much of the music sales growth will occur in less developed markets such as China and Russia, which are forecast to become the fifth and sixth largest CD markets respectively by 2010.

In the United States, album sales rose nearly 2 percent in 2004, after a three-year slump, according to figures from a Nielsen SoundScan survey earlier this month.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=7344490


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Video Game Industry Sales Reach Record Pace in 2004
Matt Richtel

The video game industry enjoyed record sales in 2004, despite a shortage of game consoles over the holiday season, according to figures released yesterday.

The data from NPD Funworld, a market research firm, showed that United States sales of video game consoles, portable devices and the games made for those platforms were $9.9 billion in 2004. That figure is slightly below the overall sales figure of $10 billion in 2003. However, the 2004 figure does not yet include sales of games for personal computers. When those sales are included in a report due in the next few days, overall sales for the year will be a record, NPD said.

The 2004 sales include a surge in sales of games for hand-held devices, which hit $1 billion in 2004, up from $903 million in 2003.

The strong overall sales figures are significant, industry executives said, because they come at a time when video game companies and investors had expected a normal cyclical slowdown in the industry.

Such ebbs have historically come as game console models reach the end of their cycles and consumers wait for the introduction of a new generation of devices. Sony and Microsoft, makers of the two most popular consoles, the Sony PlayStation 2 and the Microsoft Xbox, are gearing up to introduce new consoles in the next 18 months.

This growth is occurring in the twilight of the cycle, said Douglas Lowenstein, president of the Entertainment Software Association, an industry trade group.

Sales were driven by sequels and games for older players. The two top-selling games were Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, which sold more than 5.1 million copies since October, and Halo 2, which sold more than 4.2 million copies since November, NPD said. The top 10 titles sold for game consoles in 2004 accounted for 15 percent of overall sales, NPD said.

The top titles also showed the strength of Take-Two Interactive, a video game publisher and distributor based in New York. It distributed 3 of the top 10 games, including Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and a football game called ESPN NFL 2K5. The only other company to have three Top 10 games was Electronic Arts, the largest independent video game maker.

Over all, sales of games for consoles and portable devices was $6.2 billion. Sales of games for personal computers were $700 million from January through November, with full-year figures expected soon.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/19/te...y/19games.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Comcast Expected To Raise Broadband Speeds
Jim Hu

Comcast next week is expected to announce plans to raise its broadband Internet speeds for all customers by at least a third later this year, according to sources familiar with the plans.

The nation's largest cable company and broadband provider will raise its current speed of up to 3mbps (megabits per second) downstream and 256kbps (kilobits per second) upstream to 4mbps and 384kbps, respectively, at no additional cost. Comcast will also offer its more expensive 4mbps customers a 50 percent increase to 6mbps downstream and 768kbps upstream, the sources said.

Comcast has upgraded its speed as part of an overall effort not only to distance itself from slower DSL (digital subscriber line) services but to add more high-bandwidth features, such as video e-mail, for its Comcast.net subscribers.

Other cable companies have taken similar steps to raise their speeds. In December, Time Warner Cable decided to raise its basic download speed to 5mbps from 3mbps for free. Months earlier, Cox Communications said it would raise its speed limit from 3mbps to 4mbps.

A Comcast spokeswoman declined to comment.

Cable companies have ratcheted up their broadband speeds as a defensive maneuver against heightened competition from the Baby Bell phone companies. After years of heel-dragging, the Bells have made an aggressive push to attract the growing number of Americans switching to broadband by offering lower prices for their DSL services.

In contrast to cable's average subscription fee of $45 a month, the Bells are selling DSL for as low as $26.95 a month with a basic phone line. But basic-tier DSL services are slower than cable, typically reaching a limit of 1.5mbps.

Broadband has become the central battleground between cable and the Bells. Both sides are packaging other services, such as video and voice, into their broadband bundles in hopes of keeping subscribers loyal to their systems.

Comcast, for example, recently announced plans to sell phone service over Internet lines--a technology known as voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP--in a competitive move against the Bells.

But the Bells remain laggards in overall broadband market share, with about 40 percent to cable's 60 percent. Comcast remains the largest broadband provider, with 6.5 million subscribers as of Sept. 30.

The latest upgrades will begin in the first quarter of this year. Comcast will update its subscriber numbers when it reports its quarterly earnings Feb. 3.
http://news.com.com/Comcast+expected...3-5537139.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Verizon and Yahoo Team Up to Offer Broadband Service
Ken Belson

Verizon Communications, the nation's largest telecommunications company, said yesterday that it planned to work with Yahoo, the Internet search engine, to introduce a portal for its high-speed Internet service.

The venture comes as competition for broadband customers between telephone and cable companies continues to heat up. Yahoo is also looking for ways to attract visitors to its Web sites and reduce its reliance on advertising revenue.

In the multiyear deal, Verizon's 3.3 million broadband customers will be able to use the co-branded portal at no additional charge. Yahoo will receive an undisclosed share of Verizon's broadband subscription fees, and Verizon will get a share of the advertising revenue generated by the portal.

The Yahoo venture comes on top of a similar arrangement Verizon has with MSN, the Microsoft portal.

When the Yahoo portal is introduced this summer, Verizon customers will be offered a choice of Verizon, Yahoo or MSN portal as their home page.

The arrangement is a less ambitious version of the venture Yahoo has had with SBC Communications since September 2002. In that deal, SBC invested $300 million in Yahoo.

SBC and Yahoo are also expanding their partnership. Yahoo is now designing portals for SBC's IP television service and mobile phone service. This will let customers use one ID and password on a variety of electronic devices.

Verizon may ultimately do the same thing. The company is installing fiber optic networks that reach customers' homes in nine states. The service, called Fios, includes high- speed Internet connections and phone service. Verizon also intends to provide television on its network.

In the meantime, Yahoo hopes to increase revenue from its premium services by making a more direct connection to millions of Verizon customers. Yahoo currently charges fees for e-mail accounts with extra storage and antispam software, commercial-free Internet radio and video services streamed to consumers' computers.

"We want to get in front of users in a different way," said Steve Boom, senior vice president for broadband access at Yahoo.

At the end of the third quarter of 2004, Yahoo had 7.6 million subscribers for its premium services, an 81 percent increase from the same quarter a year earlier. Yahoo reports fourth-quarter and full-year earnings today.

For its part, Verizon is battling for broadband customers with cable providers like Comcast and Time Warner Cable. Comcast, which has the most high-speed Internet customers, has increased the speed of its broadband connections without customers paying additional charges. The company has also started offering free video services.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/te...y/18yahoo.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10G

First U.S. Campus Production 10 Gigabit Ethernet Broadband Connection

The Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in California announced today that the first production 10 gigabit Ethernet campus connection in the United States was installed from the University of California, San Diego to CENIC’s high-performance backbone network, CalREN.
Press Release

The Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in California (CENIC) announced today that the first production 10 gigabit Ethernet campus connection in the United States was installed from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) to CENIC’s high-performance backbone network, CalREN. Upgrading from their one gigabit connection, this new link provides unprecedented wide area network capacity to UCSD’s students, faculty and staff. UCSD chose to pursue this connection as its researchers have extreme needs for ever larger data transfer and more powerful distributed collaboration particularly in the biomedical and ocean sciences.

Now spanning each of California’s 58 counties, CENIC’s CalREN is the nation’s most powerful statewide, education and research-focused network. Serving all educational institutions in California (from K-12 on up), CalREN network connections offer educators and researchers the ability to access and use state-of-the art resources throughout California and the nation. The network enables delivery of advanced curriculum, access to advanced research resources and service to schools regardless of size or location and provides a flexible growth path for continued high-quality, education-focused Internet connectivity. Currently, other major research universities in California are connected at one gigabit.

“UCSD prides itself in offering the best research and education assets to its faculty, staff, and students. Being first with our production 10 Gigabit connection to CENIC’s CalREN backbone network enables our researchers to have the best tools available, right at their desktop,” said Marye Anne Fox, UCSD’s chancellor. “While we have other, faster connections for specialized research projects on campus, the new 10 gigabit Ethernet connection enables every campus member to access the full power of broadband and access the global Internet and Internet2 community at large.”

Other institutions at UCSD that are participating in the high-performance campus network include the San Diego Supercomputer Center and the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology.

“This connection represents both a major milestone for California’s research and education community and a revolutionary model for the rest of the nation. CENIC continues to demonstrate success in building out advanced network capabilities and enabling the best research in the nation,” says Jim Dolgonas, president and chief operating officer of CENIC.
http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/509234/?sc=swtn


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brave New Era for Privacy Fight
Kim Zetter

As the nation prepares for President Bush's inauguration next week, privacy activists on both sides of the political spectrum are bracing for a White House push to augment controversial domestic surveillance powers gained under the Patriot Act and other legislation passed since 9/11.

"The administration has made it clear that they do intend to continue their move to dramatically reduce privacy and constitutional protection for our citizens," said former Republican congressman Bob Barr, who now works as a speaker and consultant to organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union.

But surveillance legislation isn't the only concern on the minds of privacy advocates. They're also looking at technologies and services coming out of the commercial sector that could seriously affect civil liberties. Some of the important issues to watch this year are:

Patriot Act enhancements

In his state-of-the-union speech last year, Bush urged Congress to renew certain provisions of the Patriot Act that are set to expire at the end of this year.

Barr and other civil liberties advocates expect that the administration, believing it has a mandate to gain the powers it wants, will also try to push through new Patriot Act II provisions, which the administration partly abandoned when their existence came to light and caused an uproar in 2003. Barr expects the administration will pass provisions piecemeal in other legislation to avoid controversy, as it did last year with the Anti-Terrorism Intelligence Tools Improvement Act of 2003, or HR3179.

"This will be a crucial battle over the coming two years to see whether Congress really will stand up for the privacy rights of our citizens," Barr said. "The record so far has not been terribly optimistic."

One possible reason for optimism could be the SAFE Act, introduced in 2003, which Barr sees as a sign that some members of Congress regretted passing the Patriot Act with insufficient checks and balances. The Security and Freedom Ensured Act of 2003, or SB1709, is a bipartisan bill that refines some of the more invasive provisions of the Patriot Act regarding wiretaps, library records and other types of surveillance. The bill has 19 co-sponsors but has been frozen in the Senate for more than a year. A House companion bill (HR3352) has also been stuck.

Data mining

The corporate sector has increasingly been collaborating with government agencies in data-mining projects that whittle away individual liberties. Privacy advocates say this will be the most important issue to watch this year.

Although laws prohibit the government from building dossiers on individuals, they don't prohibit the government from buying information from commercial data aggregators like Acxiom, ChoicePoint and LexisNexis, which collect information about citizens' web surfing, bank transactions, doctor visits and travel itineraries. And there are no laws governing how federal agencies can use the data.

The concern cuts both ways, however. Privacy advocates say there are currently few safeguards governing how private corporations can use information passed to them by government authorities. For example, the Fleet Bank in Boston closed the financial accounts of several customers after law enforcement made inquiries about the customers' transactions in the course of a terrorist investigation. Although authorities never found any reason to charge the customers with a crime, the bank closed their accounts anyway.

Kim Taipale, executive director of the Center for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology Policy, said that monitoring and battling such corporate/government partnerships takes a concerted effort that has, until now, been lacking.

"When the public spotlight is on it, it creates a lot of concern and attracts a lot of attention, but the battle is getting the public spotlight to shine on these plans," Taipale said.

European and Latin American countries are also looking to establish privacy safeguards for data collected by U.S. companies on foreign consumers. According to Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, U.S. commercial data aggregators have collected information on Latin American consumers and dropped it into border-patrol databases to help officials determine who should be allowed entry to the United States.

"This data from property records and DMV and voter-registration records in those countries should not be going to the U.S. for these purposes," Rotenberg said. "The flow of information around the world will be a very big issue this year."

National ID

Another important issue is the adoption last month of what could become a de facto national ID card. Even though Congress previously nixed a proposal for a national ID card on grounds that it would be too intrusive and prone to abuse, a driver's license provision in the National Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Act, passed before Congress' holiday recess, requires all driver's licenses to be standardized to include machine-readable, encoded data by the end of 2006.

Although the legislation didn't specify what data would be encoded in the cards, it gave authority to the secretary of transportation, in consultation with the Homeland Security secretary, to define the data within 18 months.

Privacy advocates are concerned that rather than just preventing ID fraud, the data on cards could be linked to a national database containing dossiers of information gathered from other sources.

Robert Ellis Smith, publisher of the Privacy Journal, has said the new law "will have more serious consequences for individual liberties of American citizens than any other law enacted in at least two decades."

Privacy legislation and states' rights

Privacy advocates expect ongoing battles between the federal government and states over jurisdiction in privacy matters. California experienced such a scuffle when Congress, bowing to pressure from business lobbyists, passed a law in 2003 that undid a California privacy regulation.

The state law would have let bank and brokerage customers prevent financial institutions from sharing their personal information -- such as bank balances, credit card purchases and stock holdings -- with affiliate companies. California has been a leader in passing privacy legislation, but Rotenberg says the state's moves have made a lot of people inside and outside of corporate boardrooms uncomfortable.

"There's a lot of nervousness in Washington about California's willingness to create privacy laws," Rotenberg said, "and I think you may see some effort to use federal authority to reign in states."

DNA databases

Although Californians have high regard for privacy, this regard didn't extend to criminal suspects last November when residents approved one of the most aggressive DNA measures in the country, which privacy advocates say will likely be copied nationwide.

The DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act allows authorities to take DNA samples from anyone -- adult or juvenile -- convicted of a felony. Currently, it also lets police collect samples from any adult arrested for specific felonies, such as sexual assault and murder, even before they are convicted.

But in 2009, that authority will expand to allow police to collect DNA samples from any suspect arrested for any felony -- including nonviolent crimes like residential burglary -- whether or not the person is charged or convicted. It's expected that genetic data for 1 million people -- including innocent suspects -- will be added to California's DNA databank by 2009, making it the largest state DNA databank in the country.

"Not long ago, people said we would only collect for felony convictions of sex crimes where there is a high level of concern about recidivism," Rotenberg said. "Now it's dramatically expanded to non-sex crimes and even misdemeanors. I can now imagine the world of perfect DNA matching that (the film) Gattaca depicted."

RFID tags

Radio-frequency ID tags will become a bigger issue in 2005 as their use expands into new areas. Currently, stores and companies embed RFID tags in the packaging of drugs and commercial products to help track product supplies and update orders. But privacy advocates say the tags will soon be embedded in clothing and other products, raising concerns that the tracking might not stop when consumers leave a store with the product.

"The problem is not only about tracking the whereabouts of people but about linking associations," Rotenberg said. "Students with RFID student cards can be grouped and monitored in terms of who they're with."

Chips embedded beneath the skin will also become a larger issue.

Last October, the FDA approved an implantable computer chip that would contain medical information to assist with health care. The military has discussed implanting the chips in soldiers to speed up medical care, and Rotenberg said it's likely the chips will soon be used in prisoners, parolees and eventually children. The concern is with forced chipping, which would take away choice from individuals receiving the chips.

Rotenberg expects 2005 to be a busy year for privacy advocates. But he hopes that individuals won't leave it to organized activists to do all the work to protect privacy rights or think that because a specific right doesn't pertain to them that it's OK for others to lose it.

"It's a mistake to think that privacy is an individualist or atavist right," Rotenberg said. "I really view privacy as a collective right. When someone else is forced to give up their privacy, yours could be the next to go."
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,66242,00.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Speak Easy Plan For Media Players
BBC

Music and film fans will be able to control their digital media players just by speaking to them, under plans in development by two US firms.

ScanSoft and Gracenote are developing technology to give people access to their film and music libraries simply by voice control.

They want to give people hands-free access to digital music and films in the car, or at home or on the move.

Huge media libraries on some players can make finding single songs hard.

"Voice command-and-control unlocks the potential of devices that can store large digital music collections," said Ross Blanchard, vice president of business development for Gracenote.

"These applications will radically change the car entertainment experience, allowing drivers to enjoy their entire music collections without ever taking their hands off the steering wheel," he added.

Individual song

Gracenote provides music library information for millions of different albums for jukeboxes such as Apple's iTunes.

The new technology will be designed so that people can play any individual song or movie out of a collection, just by saying its name.

Users will also be able to request music that fits a mood or an occasion, or a film just by saying the actor's name.

"Speech is a natural fit for today's consumer devices, particularly in mobile environments," said Alan Schwartz, vice president of SpeechWorks, a division of ScanSoft.

"Pairing our voice technologies with Gracenote's vast music database will bring the benefits of speech technologies to a host of consumer devices and enable people to access their media in ways they've never imagined."

The two firms did not say if they were developing the technology for languages other than English.

Users will also be able to get more information on a favourite song they have been listening to by asking: "What is this?"

Portable players are becoming popular in cars and a number of auto firms are working with Apple to device interfaces to control the firm's iPod music player.

But with tens of thousands of songs able to be stored on one player, voice control would make finding that elusive track by Elvis Presley much easier.

The firms gave no indication about whether the iPod, or any other media player, were in mind for the use of the voice control technology.

The companies estimate that the technology will be available in the fourth quarter of 2005.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...gy/4185667.stm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Jack Spratts

Elvis Still King with Britain's 1,000th No. 1
Jason Hopps

Elvis Presley notched another musical milestone Sunday when a re-release of his 1959 hit "One Night" became the 1,000th song to top the British pop charts.

The limited-edition re-issue quickly sold out across Britain and was fetching as much as $74 a copy on auction Web sites such as eBay even before it hit No. 1.

The growling, bluesy song became the 1,000th chart topper more than 50 years after Al Martino crooned his way to No. 1 with "Here In My Heart," the first song to top Britain's popular music charts.

The "One Night" re-issue was Elvis's 20th British No. 1 -- more than any other solo artist -- and came just a week after a re-release of his 1957 thumping classic "Jailhouse Rock" topped the UK chart.

Elvis's record label is re-releasing 18 No. 1's in consecutive weeks, in time to cash in before the 50-year copyright protection on sound recordings in most European countries expires on his earlier hits.

The King of Rock and Roll's latest No. 1 comes more than 27 years after his death.

"He was the best and there'll never be anyone like him," said Sid Shaw, who has written several books on Elvis and runs an Elvis memorabilia shop in London.

"He's as popular as he ever was, especially in Britain. There's something in his voice, his songs, his moves, you just can't forget him," Shaw told Reuters.

Welsh band Manic Street Preachers fell just shy of taking the 1000th number one from Elvis, entering at No. 2 with "Empty Souls."

PAUL MCCARTNEY

The memorable, forgettable and plain awful have topped the chart since Martino went to number one in 1952.

Paul McCartney, with the Beatles, Wings and as a solo artist, is the all-time chart topper with 22 No. 1 hits.

Canadian singer Bryan Adams holds the record for most consecutive weeks at No. 1 with "Everything I Do (I Do It For You)," which held the top slot for 16 weeks in 1991.

A poll for Sky Television listed the worst-ever No. 1's as Aqua's "Barbie Girl," children's favorites The Teletubbies' "Teletubbies Say E-OH" and Mr. Blobby's "Mr. Blobby."

While original rockers like Elvis can still grab the No. 1 spot, the pop industry and the charts are facing their biggest shake-up in decades thanks to the boom in Internet downloading.

For the first time, the Official UK Charts plans to combine record sales with legal downloads to present a clearer picture of what's turning listeners on.

"At the moment the official chart isn't the most reliable indicator of what people are buying," said Radio DJ and pop music historian Paul Gambaccini.

"It will be as soon as they fold in the downloads," he said.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsAr...N-ELVIS-DC.XML


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FBI Tosses Carnivore to the Dogs
Ted Bridis

The FBI has effectively abandoned its custom-built internet surveillance technology, once known as Carnivore, designed to read e-mails and other online communications among suspected criminals, terrorists and spies, according to bureau oversight reports submitted to Congress.

Instead, the FBI said it has switched to unspecified commercial software to eavesdrop on computer traffic during such investigations and has increasingly asked internet providers to conduct wiretaps on targeted customers on the government's behalf, reimbursing companies for their costs.

The FBI performed only eight internet wiretaps in fiscal 2003 and five in fiscal 2002; none used the software initially called Carnivore and later renamed the DCS-1000, according to FBI documents submitted to Senate and House oversight committees. The FBI, which once said Carnivore was "far better" than commercial products, said previously it had used the technology about 25 times between 1998 and 2000.

The FBI said it could not disclose how much it spent to produce the surveillance software it no longer uses, saying part of its budget was classified. Outside experts said the government probably spent between $6 million and $15 million.

The congressional oversight reports were obtained last week under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act by the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center, a civil liberties group that criticized the surveillance software after it was first disclosed in 2000.

FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said the bureau moved to popular commercial wiretap software because it was less expensive and had improved in its ability to copy e-mails and other communications of a targeted internet account without affecting other subscribers.

"We see the value in the commercially available software; we're using it more now and we're asking the internet service providers that have the capabilities to collect data in compliance with court orders," Bresson said.

The FBI said last week it was sending back to the drawing board its $170 million computer overhaul, which was intended to give agents and analysts an instantaneous and paperless way to manage criminal and terrorism cases.

Experts said the life span of roughly four years for the bureau's homegrown surveillance technology was similar to the shelf life of cutting-edge products in private industry.

"It's hard to criticize the FBI trying to keep pace with technology," said James Dempsey of the Washington-based Center for Democracy and Technology. "There is just a huge amount of innovation and development going on in the private sector."

Henry H. Perritt Jr., who led an oversight study of Carnivore in 2000 for the Justice Department, said the FBI originally built its own surveillance system because commercial tools were inadequate. Perritt, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, said he was unaware of any commercial wiretap software that includes audit features robust enough to convince a federal judge that e-mails from innocent internet users weren't captured by mistake.

"You'd like to have a package that supervisors within a field office and in Washington could do an audit and make sure they're using the tools compliant with the court order," Perritt said.

The FBI laboratory division, which produced Carnivore, was headed by Donald M. Kerr, who left the FBI in August 2001 to become the CIA's chief gadget-maker as head of its science and technology directorate. Kerr told lawmakers in 2000 that Carnivore was "far better than any commercially available sniffer."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...stomwire.ht m


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Heartaches of Journalist Bloggers
Adam L. Penenberg

After Chris Allbritton returned to New York from Iraqi Kurdistan, he raised $15,000 and headed back to Iraq in 2003 as the first independent journalist-blogger sponsored by his readers. There he risked life and limb covering the war and its messy aftermath, detailing his experiences on his blog, Back-to-Iraq 3.0.
With 25,000 readers a day checking out his dispatches, Allbritton was able to build on this success by securing a plum assignment as Time magazine's Baghdad correspondent. As a result, Allbritton has had to change his approach to blogging.

"I'm just very, very careful," Allbritton said. "I never scoop Time, for instance. And I've become much more miserly in parceling out my opinions. I place a whole lot more emphasis on the reporting on the blog, rather than taking a stance. This has alienated a significant number of my readers, who have accused me of selling out, going corporate, whatever. But, I came to Iraq to become a full-time foreign correspondent, so them's the breaks."

He also doesn't post as often on his blog anymore, and says he is thinking of shutting it down.

Allbritton isn't the only journalist-blogger who serves two competing masters. Om Malik, a senior writer at Business 2.0, pens two online columns a month, as well as contributing features to the magazine, while operating a blog on broadband that attracts 350,000 unique visitors a month. But it's his day job that pays the bills.

"My first commitment is to my publisher, my magazine," said Malik, who is also the author of Broadbandits: Inside the $750 Billion Telecom Heist. "Last month I earned $9 in net profit (on my blog). Thank God for Google AdSense -- they let me break even now. Last year, I spent a lot of money out-of-pocket, when my bandwidth costs went through the roof."

For all the press that bloggers have received for revolutionizing journalism by bringing Gutenberg's printing press to the digital masses, when push comes to shove, journalists who operate personal weblogs face an inherent conflict of interest. In the end, it's the blogs that usually get short shrift.

And according to some, that's the way it ought to be. As Jason Calacanis, founder of Weblogs and publisher of the defunct Silicon Alley Reporter, put it in an e-mail: "Blogger + reporter = big problem. I wouldn't do that, and I'm sure it will end in tears. I know as an editor of a magazine or newspaper I wouldn't want my paid editors putting scoops out on their blog when those scoops could be driving and growing the print product."

But it's not just about who gets the scoops. A more serious question is how can bloggers, whose success depends largely on sharing unvarnished opinions, also work as so-called objective journalists?

There are no easy answers, and many media outlets find it easiest to avoid perceptions of bias by simply issuing blanket restrictions on what their reporters can say and do outside of work. In the past, for example, CNN pressured correspondent Kevin Sites to shut down his blog from Iraq. Time put the kibosh on freelancer Joshua Kucera's personal blog, and the Hartford Courant strong-armed one of its columnists, Denis Horgan, to stop him from blogging. (With the exception of Kucera, they have all returned to the blogosphere.)

Wall Street Journal staffers agree to follow a code of conduct that restricts certain activities to ensure "the independence and integrity" of its publications, services and products. I imagine the Journal is particularly sensitive after an e-mail from Farnaz Fassihi, one of its reporters based in Baghdad, made the rounds last year, portraying life in Iraq as much more dire than her published work suggested.

The New York Times (.pdf) requires its staffers to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, and requires that no newsroom or editorial employee "do anything that damages the Times's reputation for strict neutrality."

Although the policy doesn't specifically cover blogs (yet), the Times prohibits staff from marching or rallying "in support of public causes or movements," and from signing "ads that take a position on public issues ... if doing so might reasonably raise doubts about their ability or the Times's ability to function as neutral observers in covering the news." Timesians may appear on radio and TV but "they should avoid expressing views that go beyond what they would be allowed to say in the paper." (Of course, Op-Ed columnists like Maureen Dowd and William Safire "enjoy more leeway than others in speaking publicly because their business is expressing opinions.")

But this whole idea that so-called objective journalists should hide their true feelings may be misguided. Reporters are people, too (really), and just because they express opinions doesn't mean their reporting should be dismissed out of hand, as long as they arrive at their conclusions honestly, through rigorous reporting. In fact, when journalists give two opposing viewpoints equal weight in an attempt to be even-handed, they are engaging in superficial "he said, she said" journalism that may actually be undermining the search for truth, since one side might be completely without merit.

Readers "know journalists have opinions," said blogger Ed Cone, who also writes for CIO Insight. "A writer who expresses an opinion in a weblog, and explains how that opinion relates to the subject he or she covers at work, might seem more credible, not less."

Another member of the blognoscenti, Instapundit's Glenn Reynolds, agrees. "I think that the openness of opinions helps, rather than hurts, since it allows you to make adjustment for known bias, rather than guessing at unknown bias."

And Peter Rojas of Engadget thinks the entire issue should be flipped on its head. "It's a mistake to think that we're making a choice between objectivity and honesty, with traditional media on one side and blogs on the other," he said. "The larger issue here is trust, and whether or not readers trust the media outlets they're relying on for news or information. If anything, being forthright and honest on blogs might have a positive effect on how people perceive the rest of their reporting."

So perhaps publications shouldn't worry that reporters who maintain personal blogs will undermine their organization's objectivity. After all, the Times has been hit with accusations of bias for years, well before the advent of blogs.

Meanwhile, blog readers shouldn't worry that mainstream publications get the primo stuff either. Blogs are "a value-added proposition," Malik said. "I used to print out articles, stick them in a file and review them later. Now I just blog it. It's a repository for my thought process."
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66251,00.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From July

P2P Company Not Going Anywhere
Michelle Delio

It seems logical that the headquarters of a file-sharing network would be located offshore, far from the reach of the long legal arm of the Recording Industry Association of America or Republican Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch.

Hatch's latest foray into file sharing, the Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act (SB2560), backed by the RIAA, would hold liable anyone who "intentionally aids, abets or induces'' others to violate copyright laws. The penalties for copyright infringement can be up to $30,000 per infringement, and up to $150,000 per instance of willful infringement.

Major technology companies such as Sun, Intel and Google have released or signed statements saying that the broad wording of the bill could lead to litigation aimed at every company that produces consumer devices devoted to any type of digital file access or storage.

But Jed McCaleb, founder and CTO of file-sharing network eDonkey, and Sam Yagan, president of the company, don't have to wonder whether the Hatch bill will affect their business. They already know that if SB2560 passes they'll be one of the first against the wall.

Still, they plan to continue to be very public about the location of their New York City office -- on 14th Street between Fifth and Sixth, just west of the famed Union Square Greenmarket, in a brightly painted room that looks a whole lot like the nursery of a particularly geeky toddler.

Yagan and McCaleb said they do worry about lawsuits, but they try to stay focused on getting their message out to content owners instead of fretting that the copyright police might show up for coffee some morning.

"We thought about incorporating offshore, and many attorneys tell us that we made a huge mistake not doing so," said Yagan. "But we look at it differently. Going offshore would have given the impression that we had something to hide. We hope that our status as a New York company sends a strong signal that we see ourselves as a legitimate, tax-paying software company, a technology company that the entertainment industry can do business with."

EDonkey currently averages approximately 2 million concurrent users, about 10 percent fewer than front-runner Kazaa.

"I think P2P networks will continue to expand," said McCaleb. "They are very useful tools, and it is obvious that people want to use them. I believe and hope that the recording and movie industry will come around to see what great potential lies in P2P networks and will start using them to their advantage rather than fighting against them."

Yagan points out that currently P2P users don't have the option of paying for content, even if they were inclined to, and said that it seems obvious that such an option should be provided, since legislation may change but won't stop the development and use of P2P systems.

"I don't know of a single precedent in which legislation or litigation stopped technological development," said Yagan. "Let's say, though, that the labels shut down the major peer-to-peer networks. Would P2P go away? Not at all. The networks would continue to operate even if the companies themselves go out of business. It's like if you put Xerox out of business, its copy machines will still work.

"Then what will happen is networks will spring up in jurisdictions that don't recognize U.S. laws or judgments. My favorite example is Earthstation 5. Here's an excerpt from its website:

"'Please take notice: EarthstationV Ltd., a Palestinian corporation, does not accept any legal process via e-mail, nor will we accept any attachments via e-mail. For service of process, you must serve our legal department located at our offices in the Jenin refugee camp, Jenin, Palestine.'

"Whether P2P networks can offer paid downloads is exclusively up to the major record labels and movie studios who would need to issue us the license to do so," Yagan continued. "What I do know, though, is that unlike Earthstation 5, we want to do business with the entertainment industry. The execs in L.A. might not like the prospects of working with me, but I've got to be better than the guys in Jenin."

EDonkey's software was written by McCaleb, who was and is captivated by the "interesting technical problems" specific to P2P systems. The first version was released in September 2000.

McCaleb is currently in the process of developing a new application called "kdrive," which will provide a way to securely share files and chat with friends and colleagues. McCaleb said it's an attempt to make a "secure virtual global hard drive," and though kdrive is still in early beta form, he's very excited about its potential.

"We're not really in this for the profits or because we're P2P zealots," Yagan said. "We're in this because P2P is the future of digital media distribution and we want to be a part of it. It's like when Fred Smith founded FedEx and bought his first plane -- he saw the future and an opportunity to help transform an industry."

Of course, Fred Smith didn't have anti-FedEx legislation and litigation to contend with. Yager and McCaleb, members of P2P United, a lobbying group that represents peer-to-peer software companies, said the entertainment industry outspends P2P United 300-to-1 in lobbying efforts, according to their best estimate.

"Through P2P United I've gotten an up-close look at how the legislative process works, and I have to say, it's a lot like the proverbial sausage factory -- it's a really ugly process," said McCaleb.

"Orrin Hatch's Induce Act proposed upending a century of copyright law without holding a single hearing. Not a single hearing -- one has to ask why not. Then there's the Pirate Act. The Pirate Act would direct John Ashcroft (who must have something better to do) to prosecute individuals who violate copyright law. And any judgments Ashcroft would win against U.S. citizens would go directly to the record labels -- the government would not even be reimbursed for its expenses.

"Think about it: The government would spend money prosecuting its own citizens and then send big checks to the entertainment industry. Where's the outrage?"
http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,64233,00.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Genome Model Applied to Software
Danny O'Brien

What does uncovering the secret language of DNA have in common with reverse-engineering Microsoft software?

Quite a lot, according to Marshall Beddoe, a security analyst who is turning to algorithms used in bioinformatics research to understand the arcane mysteries of closed, proprietary software.

Beddoe explained his methodology in a presentation at ToorCon, last week's San Diego security and hacker conference, showing how biologists' work can make the often tedious task of reverse- engineering network software a little simpler. In his presentation, Beddoe noted that over the last 30 years, biologists have developed an impressive battery of algorithms to spot commonalities between samples of DNA.

"It suddenly became very obvious to me I could use the algorithms used in genomics in protocol analysis," said Beddoe. "So obvious, that I've been having real problems explaining to other engineers how it works."

Beddoe calls his approach "Protocol Informatics."

For years, reverse engineers have struggled to understand the arcane mysteries of proprietary software from the only clues they had: the way the code communicates over open networks. Groups like the open-source Samba project, whose code lets Unix systems interoperate with Windows file servers, have spent hundreds of volunteer hours laboriously probing and analyzing data packets emitted by Microsoft's software.

Reverse-engineering these protocols generally consists of looking through dozens of separate computer conversations, scouring patterns that repeat themselves and working out what those sequences might mean.

The trick, according to Beddoe, is to make the right connections between the terminology of genetics and protocol analysis. Much of bioinformatics is devoted to finding DNA sequences separated by long gaps of unknown data, then a continuation of a known sequence. Since much of DNA is filled with repeating, seemingly irrelevant noise, eliminating these gaps is a common problem in genomics.

The same is true in protocol reverse-engineering. To researchers like Beddoe, network conversations are full of "junk" -- usually the actual data being sent -- which interferes with the analysis of the occasional command sequence that controls what to do with that junk. Beddoe dug up some of the oldest algorithms in the bioinformatics' armory, and used them to eliminate junk data among patterns of repeated commands.

Geneticists have also spent many years analyzing the rate of mutation between different DNA samples. Given two pieces of DNA, biologists have devised complex algorithms to discover whether they're descended from the same ancestors. The method works by comparing the genetic differences with the known mutation rates of certain DNA components.

Beddoe applied the same principles to his mutating network conversations. He notes, for example, that ASCII text is much more likely to "mutate" into other text than it is to mutate into something else. By feeding in probabilities about text instead of DNA nucleotides, Beddoe discovered that he could more easily spot related fields in network exchanges.

The genetics algorithms told him that some chunks of data were close relations; in fact, they were bits of the network protocol that were performing similar actions.

Geneticists have also had a head start in visualizing unimaginable heaps of data. Beddoe took the equations used by geneticists to display a species' family tree and created a family tree of his analyzed protocols. The result: a phylogenetic tree of Microsoft's SMB protocol, clumping interesting fragments together for further investigation.

Beddoe isn't the only one in the computer security world casting an envious eye over the bioinformatics sector's research. Dan Kaminsky, senior security consultant for Avaya, said he has been investigating using genomic pattern analysis for identifying and clustering "mutant" machines on a corporate network: PCs whose variation from the company's standard installation might make them vulnerable to compromise.

Kaminsky thinks this is only the beginning for the spread of bioinformatics ideas into other fields.

"Generating an ordered, hierarchal breakdown of interrelationships from huge piles of information is a problem that crops up everywhere. I'm not surprised to see bioinformatics solutions finally being applied to the rest of our poorly understood, oversized networks."

On the biology end, Terry Gaasterland, associate professor of computational genomics at Rockefeller University, agrees that there's a wide field of uses for the algorithms her discipline has developed -- and tricks to be learned by biologists from other fields, too.

"The problem of decoding the language of networks and the problem of finding signals in DNA are really two related instances of machine learning problems. We're almost bound to discover universal principles of information communication by investigating both," she said.

For the time being, though, Beddoe and others have one more decoding problem to battle: understanding the jargon of another field's documentation.

Justin Mason, the creator of SpamAssassin, is investigating bioinformatics approaches to spam identification. He said that to outsiders, the genomics world can seem more closed than the world of network engineers.

"A lot of the interesting research takes place in expensive journals and seminars that we can't really get hold of. It's a bit of a difference from the free exchange you get between coders online," he said.

Beddoe himself deduced much of the algorithms he used from downloading PowerPoint slides from biologists' websites.

Gaasterland disagreed with Mason's assessment and said many bioinformatic papers become freely available six months after publication. She added that the publication of Beddoe's work might provide him with more assistance from the bioinformatics community.

That'll come as a relief to Beddoe, who until now assumed that biologists wouldn't pay much heed to his project.

"They're working on uncovering the mysteries of life itself; we're just hacking network protocols," he said. "Which sounds more important to you?"
http://www.wired.com/news/infostruct...,65191,00.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Coming DVD Format War
Michel Marriott

JORDAN GREENHALL sat before a flat-panel television that glowed with remarkably crisp, bright images, offering it as evidence that he could put a full-length movie in high-definition quality on a standard DVD, with room to spare.

Neat trick.

So neat, in fact, that it would seem to upstage the efforts of the biggest consumer electronics companies and Hollywood studios, which are choosing sides in a battle between two high-definition DVD formats, Blu-ray and HD DVD. Those formats, expected to reach North America late this year, will require ultra-high-capacity DVD's and a new class of expensive players.

The advent of Blu-ray and HD DVD may give rise to a format war reminiscent of the Betamax-VHS contest in the early days of videocassette recorders. At stake are potentially billions of dollars in hardware and discs as the demand for high-definition content grows.

In the midst of the battle, for which the two sides mounted elaborate floor displays this month at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Mr. Greenhall is asking, Why wait for the giants to sort it all out? There's a little guy, he said, with a high-definition solution right now: his own company's DivX 6 software.

"We're just going straight to market," said Mr. Greenhall, the 33-year-old co-founder and chief executive of DivXNetworks. "It's cheap. It's great, and it's going to be in the DVD players."

The first DivX-capable DVD player is the $250 Avel LinkPlayer 2 by I-O Data. Mr. Greenhall and his DivX team, based in San Diego, said the company hopes to see DivX high-definition players for as little as $100 by late fall. ( Toshiba, in contrast, recently announced an HD DVD player to be brought market late this year for about $1,000.)

In short, Mr. Greenhall said, he wants high-definition DivX to be to video what the MP3 audio format was to music: a "grass-roots movement that breaks above ground." But if you're thinking about joining the movement, there is a major vulnerability: no major studio is marching along. That means those buying DivX players, for now at least, will lack prerecorded high-definition discs - like major Hollywood movies - to play in them.

All the talk of high-definition DVD's, no matter which approach ultimately prevails, may seem premature in a marketplace saturated with standard-definition DVD's. According to industry analysts, most consumers indicate that they are satisfied with the picture and audio quality of standard DVD's, and they are growing accustomed to finding the players an inexpensive commodity, priced as low as $40.

Nonetheless, as television picture quality evolves with high definition, many consumer electronics makers expect substantial demand for DVD's and players that can use that quality to advantage.

Consider, for example, the consumer who just spent thousands of dollars for the latest big-screen high-definition television, only to find that a Bon Jovi concert on a high- definition cable television service looks vastly better than a standard DVD of Zhang Yimou's color-drenched "Hero."

Besides, said Andy Parsons, senior vice president for advanced technology at Pioneer Electronics, a major backer of Blu-ray technology, consumers are already outgrowing traditional DVD's, which were first introduced in 1996.

"If you look at most of the 'A' titles coming out now - 'Spider-Man 2,' these sorts of things - they're two discs," Mr. Parsons said. "There's one for the movie and there is usually one for the bonus features."

Mr. Parsons said next-generation DVD's must offer much more storage than today's five to nine gigabytes. HD DVD, backed primarily by Toshiba, NEC and a number of studios - including Paramount Home Entertainment, Universal Pictures, Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema - is capable of storing 15 gigabytes of data on a single- layer disc. A Blu-ray DVD can store up to 25 gigabytes on a single layer and 50 gigabytes on a dual-layer disc. Both formats use blue lasers rather than the regular red one.

"It would be, I think, foolish to limit ourselves in terms of capacity unnecessarily," Mr. Parsons said. "Why not do the very best we can do as far as today's technology?"

Backers of HD DVD say making discs in their format will be much less difficult and expensive than Blu-ray DVD's, which are supported by Sony, Samsung, Hewlett- Packard, Panasonic, LG Electronics, Sharp, Mitsubishi, Dell, Walt Disney Pictures and Television, 20th Century Fox and others.

For Mr. Greenhall of DivXNetworks, much of the debate between Blu-ray and HD DVD misses the immediate point.

"The essence is that DivX makes you realize that high definition and blue laser are not linked at the hip," he said. "Blue laser means lots of storage; high definition means good quality. With DivX you don't need lots of storage to get quality."

Blu-ray and HD DVD partisans would disagree. In all these approaches, a significant factor is the way the video file is compressed to make it fit on a disc. While DivX can compress video to a greater degree - hence its use of conventional DVD's - it makes compromises in picture quality, its rivals say.

Mr. Greenhall said his company was pursuing an aggressive DivX certification program to help more DivX-capable players get to market this year. It has also received an investment from Samsung.

But, he added, he has no illusions. While DivXNetworks says that more than 160 million people worldwide have downloaded and used its video-compression software since the company was founded in 2000, the lack of studio support is a major handicap. "Very frankly," he conceded, "the studios are tough to crack on the high-definition front. They're kind of standing away."

Meanwhile, he said, DivX is "concentrating on all the other content in the universe," notably independent movies. He also noted that consumers with high-performance personal computers could record high-definition television broadcasts in DivX 6, then burn the broadcasts onto blank DVD's. High-definition home movies can also be burned onto DVD's using DivX, available as a free download at www.divx.com.

"They have begun to build a significant presence among PC users," P. J. McNealy, an analyst for American Technology Research, said of DivX. "They have become a nice alternative to HD DVD and Blu-ray, and more readily available. But the question is, can they get significant content from the major studios and television networks?"

The reputation of DivX (which is unrelated to a defunct video-rental format of the same name) has also suffered because of its early use for pirating. And after having their content on commercial DVD's illegally copied and distributed, studios have said they are less willing to take additional risks with next-generation DVD's.

So far, the studios have entrusted DivXNetworks with a few high-definition movie trailers, available from the DivX site; they can be played on a PC if a free DivX software player is downloaded and installed.

Mr. Greenhall said he was aware of whispers of the use of DivX as a piracy tool, but said it would take time to distance DivX from that image. "Dastardly deeds were done," he said, adding that such incidents happened long ago. "We've been getting away from that image for almost five years now."

He said DivX 6 provides strong digital-rights-management safeguards. He attributes the studios' caution to DivX's late entry into standards talks that gave way to the adoption of the Blu-ray and HD DVD technologies. Blu-ray players are being sold in Asia.

"We were very late to the game," Mr. Greenhall said of DivXNetworks. "A lot was going on before we matured enough to know what was going on in this world. They were in the endgame by the time we were ready."

Nonetheless, he said, as DivX high definition becomes more available in players there will be more content, and more content will help usher in more DivX-capable players. "Ten million people later," he said, pausing, the studios will have little choice but to take DivX seriously.

But Ross Rubin, director of industry analysis at the NPD Group, a research firm, said there was probably no rush to adopt any of the formats. For consumers to play high- definition DVD's, they need high-definition-capable televisions.

"The installed base right now is quite small, certainly under 10 percent of the population," Mr. Rubin said. "Consumer electronics makers probably don't want to confuse the marketplace, which is already confused enough."
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/20/te...ts/20blue.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Picture Tube TV's Try a Slimmer Strategy
Eric A. Taub

STANDARD picture-tube TV's, the kind that the vast majority of Americans still buy, have long been video non grata at the Consumer Electronics Show. Seen as yesterday's technology, they have been relegated to the back room of the show, the industry's biggest gadget festival, where flat-panel liquid-crystal-display and plasma sets take center stage.

But at this year's show in Las Vegas, picture tubes made a small comeback in thinner televisions designed to appeal to Americans' penchant for all things slim.

Over the next year, new high-definition picture-tube televisions from LG Electronics, RCA and Samsung that are about two-thirds as deep as today's picture-tube sets will go on the market. Those companies expect the new sets to be successful for one reason: price. While many industry observers predict the imminent demise of picture-tube televisions (also known as cathode-ray-tube TV's) in favor of L.C.D. and plasma models, the higher cost of flat TV's means that there may be years of life left for the venerable tube set.

While a 30-inch L.C.D. television can cost $3,000, a slim-tube model the same size will be $1,000. Those who lust after a flat-panel TV may also like the new tube versions because they will mimic the look of plasma and L.C.D. sets, with aluminum or black bezels surrounding the screen.

"It's the aspiration to a flat screen that's the driving force behind these new TV's," said Dave Arland, vice president of Thomson, the company that owns the RCA brand. "This is affordable HDTV."

Next year, the company plans to introduce two thinner-tube televisions in 26- and 30-inch models. This year, Thomson Displays, a subsidiary that makes tubes for other manufacturers, will offer the industry thinner-tube televisions in 29-, 30- and 32-inch screens.

In addition to RCA, Samsung will market three thinner SlimFit tube models this year in 26-, 27- and 30-inch sizes. And LG Electronics will introduce a 30-inch slim-tube set in August.

All models have similar depth advantages. For example, including the cabinet, Samsung's new 30-inch SlimFit model will be 16 inches deep, compared with 24 inches for its standard-tube set. (The actual tube depth has shrunk to just over 14 inches from 19.5 inches.)

That may still seem considerably deeper than an L.C.D. or plasma flat panel at that size, but the effective difference is much less to most people. While consumers love the idea of mounting a flat TV on a wall, few actually do so. Most prop the set on a shelf, using a 12-inch deep stand to hold it.

The slimmer picture-tube sets still weigh substantially more than their flat-panel counterparts. Samsung's 30-inch C.R.T. weighs 122 pounds, while the slightly larger 32-inch wide screen L.C.D. model weighs 50.

The new slim-tube TV's use a modified version of tube technology to reduce depth. To create an image with a cathode ray tube, a filament at the back narrow end of a vacuum tube is heated, which causes electrons to be emitted. A positively charged anode pulls the electrons through the thin tube. Wire coils along the tube create electromagnetic fields; by varying the charge along the field, electrons are steered out of the narrow part of the tube and then to the screen, where they excite phosphors to create the image.

To make the tubes shallower, new technologies were needed to increase the maximum deflection angle of the electrons from the standard 110 degrees to 125 degrees, allowing them to reach the farthest corners of the screen.

Techniques were also developed to ensure that all parts of the image were of uniform brightness and sharpness.

The result, executives from the three companies say, is an image that is as bright and sharp as, and possesses the same contrast levels as a standard-tube TV.

In fact, many people in the television industry acknowledge that the standard-definition image quality produced by a picture tube remains superior to the newer flat panels.

Unlike L.C.D. televisions, tube sets do not suffer from image lag, the smearing of rapidly moving images on the screen. Nor are they prone to image burn-in, as has plagued some plasma screens. "Video purists love a good cathode-ray-tube TV," said Jim Sanduski, vice president of marketing for Samsung's visual display products group.

Picture-tube TV's can also reproduce a wider range of colors than L.C.D. sets. And when transmitting poor quality images, tube televisions are more forgiving. Standard- definition television, which still makes up the bulk of television broadcasts, often looks worse on costly digital L.C.D. and plasma flat-panel televisions. Circuitry in these TV's attempts to improve the image quality by doubling the scanning lines. But if the image has a lot of imperfections, it doubles those as well.

"In today's environment, a C.R.T. television is the best all-around product," said Mr. Arland of RCA.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/20/te...ts/20tube.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ILN News Letter


Appellate CT Upholds Webcasting License Rates

The U.S. Court of Appeals for DC ruled that last week to maintain copyright license rates for webcasters. The RIAA had argued that the rates set in 2002 were too low and based on faulty market data. Decision at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data2/circs/DC/021244A.pdf


National Israeli Poet's Work Enters Public Domain

Haaretz runs an interesting story on the entry into the public domain of the work of Haim Nahman Bialik, a national Israeli poet. A volunteer group has been working to upload all of Bialik's work on the Internet. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/527933.html


French Court Refuses To Disconnect P2P USERS

A French court has dismissed arguments to shut down Internet access for P2P users. The court ruled that an expedited process could not be used, noting that the law did not allow the courts to cancel a service contract between an ISP and its customer. <http://soufron.free.fr/soufron-spip/article.php3?id_article=78>


Korea Launches New Copyright Law

Korea's Culture and Tourism Ministry has launched a new copyright law that gives singers, instrumentalists, and record producers greater authority over their work. Users who upload or download music files via the Internet without the consent of the copyright holders will be found in violation of this law and be required to pay a fine of W50 million, roughly US$48,000, or serve a maximum prison term of up to five years.
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/ht...501180011.html


Two Americans On Trial In China For Selling Infringing DVDS

Two US citizens accused of selling almost $1 million worth of illegal movies online are on trial with two alleged Chinese accomplices, in China. News reports said each could face up to 15 years in prison if convicted.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/sil...l/10673807.htm


New Study Mutes Online Music Stores

A new study by market research firm Shelley Taylor & Associates blasts music stores for confusing navigation and locking users into proprietary formats and music players. The study gave British retailer HMV the lowest marks among online music stores for being difficult to access, providing scant artist information, and confusing navigation.
http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5540135.html


Court Rules Pirating Directv Signals Violates DMCA

BNA'S Electronic Commerce & Law Report reports that a federal court in Illinois has ruled that a defendant's online boasting about his signal theft coupled with other telltale signs of pirate tradecraft are sufficient to establish an unlawful "circumvention" of DirecTV's encryption technology. The court concluded that although the copyrights to DirecTV programs are owned by third parties, the works are nonetheless "protected" works, and unauthorized access to them violate DirecTV's DMCA rights. Case name is DirecTV v. Borow (03-cv-2581). Decision at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/RACER2/index.html Article at <http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/eip.nsf/is/a0b0g4q9d6> For a free trial to source of this story, visit http://www.bna.com/products/ip/eplr.htm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Silly Server

Soulseek Follies

System Message
[server]: You have been banned for 30 minutes. This is usually the results of doing too many operations at once. Do not flood chat rooms or private chat with many messages. Do not repeat the same text several times in a row. Do not repeat quickly a search. Do not connect and disconnect quickly. Do not connect many clients at once from the same IP. This list is by no mean exhaustive. You will be able to reconnect to the service in 30 minutes. (Repeated)

Response
[member] WTF are you talking about? I’m not in chat, I’m not IM’ing, I’m not flooding, I’m not searching. I wasn't even here; I just got back from dinner. Besides UPLOADING (contributing to your network), I wasn’t doing anything at all you nimrods.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Music Like Water

People should pay for their music the way they pay for gas or electricity.
David Kusek

More people are consuming music today than ever before, yet very few of them are paying for it. The music recording industry blames file sharing for a downturn in CD sales and, with the publishing companies, has tried its best to litigate this behavior out of existence, rather than try to monetize the conduct of music fans. These efforts are fingers in a dike that is about to burst. Digital media are interactive, and people want music that they can burn to CDs, share and use as they wish. The music industry should instead look at turning this consumer phenomenon into a steady stream of cash--lots of it.

The industry ought to establish a "music utility" approach to the distribution and marketing of interactive digital music, modeled after the water, gas and electricity utility systems. It should be done voluntarily to work best for all parties, or it may eventually be legislated through a compulsory license provision.

Under a plan colleague Gerd Leonhard and I propose, con-sumers would pay a flat music licensing fee of $3 to $5 a month as part of a subscription to an Internet service provider, cellular network, digital cable service wireless carrier or other digital network provider. This fee would let people download and listen to as much music as they care to, from a vast library of files available across the networks.

These fees would result in a huge river of money. With approximately 200 million people connected to a digital network in the U.S., the potential annual revenue stream for a music utility model could be somewhere between $7 billion and $12 billion for the basic service. That is already comparable in size to the existing U.S. recorded music market, which in 2003 was $12 billion at retail, according to the Recording Industry Association of America. This basic service would be augmented with various opportunities, including packages of premium content, live concerts, new releases, artist channels, custom compilations and more. The revenue potential of these premium sources is enormous, too.

How would this money be divvied up? We propose that the industry voluntarily establish a "music utility license" for the interactive use of digital music. This license would compensate all rights holders, including the record labels and artists (for the master recording) as well as publishers and composers (for the underlying composition), with the license fee to be split in half between the owners of the sound recording and the owners of the composition, after deducting a percentage for the digital network providers. This license would be available to anyone willing to implement its terms. The digital network companies would be required to track and report which music had been used, by employing existing digital identification and tracking technologies.

There is already precedence for such a flat-fee system in cable television and in the utility-like models of public broadcasting in Europe. Streaming digital music is already provided in basic cable plans. Cable television itself at first resisted this model, but its economics eventually led to a larger market, providing more consumer choice and more revenue streams overall. Old media almost never die. Cable television did not replace broadcast television; instead, it expanded the market dramatically, by letting video flow like water into new revenue streams--instead of down the drain.

Certainly a music utility would be a radical and complex undertaking, and there are many important details to negotiate, such as the exact nature of the license, how the funds would be administered, the specific tracking method, what collection of technologies would be employed and others. Yet there are inventors and technologists outside the mainstream music business hard at work trying to figure out how to make this happen. It's time for the main players in the music business today, namely the large record publishers, to cooperate with the inventors and jointly create a future for music where the money really flows and the global market for music can grow from $32 billion to as much as $100 billion.
http://www.forbes.com/columnists/fre.../0131/042.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Peer-To-Peer Nets 'Here To Stay'
Jo Twist

Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks are here to stay, and are on the verge of being exploited by commercial media firms, says a panel of industry experts.

Once several high-profile legal cases against file-sharers are resolved this year, firms will be very keen to try and make money from P2P technology.

The expert panel probed the future of P2P at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier in January.

The first convictions for P2P piracy were handed out in the US in January.

William Trowbridge and Michael Chicoine pleaded guilty to charges that they infringed copyright by illegally sharing music, movies and software.

Since the first successful file-sharing network Napster was forced to close down, the entertainment industry has been nervous and critical of P2P technology, blaming it for falling sales and piracy.

But that is going to change very soon, according to the panel.

Control and cash

The music and film industries have started some big legal cases against owners of legitimate P2P networks - which are not illegal in themselves - and of individuals accused of distributing pirated content over networks.

But they have slowly realised that P2P is a good way to distribute content, said Travis Kalanick, founder and chairman of P2P network Red Swoosh, and soon they are all going to want a slice of it.

They are just waiting to come up with "business models" that work for them, which includes digital rights management and copy-protection standards.

But, until the legal actions are resolved, experimentation with P2P cannot not happen, said Michael Weiss, president of StreamCast Networks.

Remembering the furore around VCRs when they first came out, Mr Weiss said: "Old media always tries to stop new media.

"When they can't stop it, they try to control it. Then they figure out how to make money and they always make a lot of money."

Once the courts decided that the VCR in itself was not an illegal technology, the film studios turned it into an extremely lucrative business.

In August 2004, the San Francisco-based US Court of Appeals ruled in favour of Grokster and StreamCast, two file-sharing networks.

The court said they were essentially in the same position that Sony was in the 1980s VCR battle, and said that the networks themselves could not be deemed as illegal.

Legal too

P2P networks usually do not rely on dedicated servers for the transfer of files.

Instead it uses direct connections between computers - or clients. There are now many different types of P2P systems than work in different ways.

P2P nets can be used to share any kind of file, like photos, free software, licensed music and any other digital content.

The BBC has already decided to embrace the technology.

It aims to offer most of its own programmes for download this year and it will use P2P technology to distribute them.

The files would be locked seven days after a programme aired making rights management easier to control.

But the technology is still demonised and misunderstood by many.

The global entertainment industry says more than 2.6 billion copyrighted music files are downloaded every month, and about half a million films are downloaded a day.

Legal music download services, like Apple iTunes, Napster, have rushed into the music marketplace to try and lure file-sharers away from free content.

Sales of legally-downloaded songs grew tenfold in 2004, with 200 million tracks bought online in the US and Europe in 12 months, the IFPI reported this week.

But such download services are very different from P2P networks, not least because of the financial aspect.

Creating their own

There are several money-spinning models that could turn P2P into a golden egg for commercial entertainment companies.

Paid-for-pass-along, in which firms receive money each time a file is shared, along with various DRM solutions and advertiser-based options are all being considered.

"We see there are going to be different models for commoditising P2P," said Marc Morgenstern, vice president of anti-piracy firm Overpeer.

"Consumers are hungry for it and we will discover new models together," agreed Mr Morgenstern.

But many net users will continue to ignore the entertainment industry's potential controlling grip on content and P2P technology by continuing to use it for their own creations.

Unsigned bands, for example, use P2P networks to distribute their music effectively, which also draws the attention of record companies looking for new artists to sign.

"Increasingly, what you are seeing on P2P is consumer-created content," said Derek Broes, from Microsoft.

"They will probably pay an increasing role in helping P2P spread," he said.

Looking into P2P's future, file sharing is just the beginning for P2P networks, as far as Mr Broes is concerned.

"Once some of these issues are resolved, you are going to see aggressive movement to protect content, but also in ways that are unimaginable now," he said.

"File-sharing is the tip of the iceberg."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4191581.stm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Homerun
Jack

A great modern pleasure is the technical ease in which artists can commit their ideas to form and share them with the world. That it changes everything in the creator-corporation equation and obviates 100 years of Intellectual Policy laws is beyond dispute. It's truly a wonderful thing. One aspect that's inspired me is the extent people will go when expressing themselves, and the work and passion they’ll apply, even if the object of their affections is a company or product. Enjoyment can be found in many ways, from a deep sense of personal satisfaction when expressing oneself, to the sheer pleasure of doing something well.

Here’s a paean to a product: the creator is 36-year-old schoolteacher George Masters and the merchandise an Apple iPod. It’s a homemade commercial, done in Masters’ spare time and the first of its kind that I’m aware of. In spite of its pedigree or perhaps because of it it’s brilliantly done and as good - or better - than what's on TV now. If I’d first seen it without knowing its history, I would have accepted it completely, so thoroughly does it capture the Apple zeitgeist.

So the next time you’re cornered by IP trolls posting negative nonsense like "We have to stop program swapping and the commercial-blocking features of DVR’s in order to save TV", tell ‘em to take it someplace else. If the products are good enough to deserve commercials we’ll make our own, and share them. Then show them this, George’s out of the park debut.

















Until next week,

- js.














~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Current Week In Review.





Recent WiRs -

January 15th , January 8th, January 1st, December 25th

Jack Spratt's Week In Review is published every Friday. Please submit letters, articles, and press releases in plain text English to jackspratts (at) lycos (dot) com. Include contact info. Submission deadlines are Wednesdays @ 1700 UTC.


"The First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public." - Hugo Black