P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Political Asylum
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-09-08, 05:47 PM   #1
daddydirt
even the losers
 
daddydirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,090
Default

and when exactly in this thread did i say that they were different? that's right, never.

you speak so derogatively of McCain's ambition like it's a terrible thing. the point of entering an election is to win....and during that period all politicians change their positions many times and pander to certain groups in order to pick up votes. (yes, even your candidate does that)

McCain has been a member of congress for 26 years now, and there were many many occasions when he broke ranks with his own party or leaders of his party and took an opposing stance on an issue. Obama on the other hand was first elected to congress in 2004. As of today he hasn't even served 4 years yet, not one stinkin' term. And how many of those 4 years have been spent running for president?

By any stretch of the imagination he has almost no real experience, yet you want someone like that deciding domestic and foreign policy for the nation? Because he was against the war in Iraq first? That's it? When did he reach across the aisle to work with Republicans, and what gives you hope that he will in the future, because he says so? McCain's actual deeds have proved his willingness to work with the other side.

the only thing different about your candidate is the color of his skin. that fact alone almost makes me want to vote for him. unfortunately, everything else about him is the same old bullshit, so i must repectfully decline. and i certainly don't harbor any ODS.
daddydirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 07:17 PM   #2
theknife
my name is Ranking Fullstop
 
theknife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddydirt View Post
Because he was against the war in Iraq first? That's it?
that's good enough for me.

it was the most significant foreign policy decision in a generation - only one candidate had the foresight and the judgement to see it for the fiasco that it would become. moreover, the other candidate continues to defend and support what has become the greatest policy failure of the Bush administration. the choice is obvious.
theknife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 07:48 PM   #3
daddydirt
even the losers
 
daddydirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theknife View Post
that's good enough for me.

it was the most significant foreign policy decision in a generation - only one candidate had the foresight and the judgement to see it for the fiasco that it would become. moreover, the other candidate continues to defend and support what has become the greatest policy failure of the Bush administration. the choice is obvious.
you are certainly entitled to your opinions, but that's all they are, opinions.

only time will reveal whether the results were worth the effort. and even if history eventually proves that Bush was correct, those with BDS will never give him any credit.
daddydirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 08:03 PM   #4
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Roll eyes 3 oops.. does not compute

ok, you might have to clarify on this BDS business..

I guess it is going to have to be 'brain dead' something?
Brain Dead Software?
Battlefield Data System
Borland Developer Studio
Bridgestreet Accommodation, Inc.
Brindisi, Italy
British Driving Society (carriage horses)
Broadcast Data Systems
Brownian Dynamics Simulation
Bundle Delivery System
Bundled Digital Services

possible match?
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 08:15 PM   #5
theknife
my name is Ranking Fullstop
 
theknife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by multi View Post
ok, you might have to clarify on this BDS business..

I guess it is going to have to be 'brain dead' something?
Brain Dead Software?
Battlefield Data System
Borland Developer Studio
Bridgestreet Accommodation, Inc.
Brindisi, Italy
British Driving Society (carriage horses)
Broadcast Data Systems
Brownian Dynamics Simulation
Bundle Delivery System
Bundled Digital Services

possible match?
Bush Derangement Syndrome...it's an attempt to categorize people who do not approve of the many well-documented failures and excesses of the Bush administration as somehow not in full possession of their faculties. based on Bush's approval rating, BDS apparently afflicts about 71% of the country. conversely, one could also ask the 29% who approve of Bush's performance what medication they are taking...
theknife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 08:31 PM   #6
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default

ahh.. excuse my ignorance... I should of looked up the urban dictionary

Well anyway.. McCain certainly seems as 'brain dead' as Bush is
watching McCain's speech the other night had me thinking that they had him on some sort of psych drugs or that he was already dead and what everybody was watching was actually a robot in the skin of a dead man..
what ever it was it didn't look right... creepy in fact.
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-08, 08:34 PM   #7
daddydirt
even the losers
 
daddydirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theknife View Post
Bush Derangement Syndrome...it's an attempt to categorize people who do not approve of the many well-documented failures and excesses of the Bush administration as somehow not in full possession of their faculties. based on Bush's approval rating, BDS apparently afflicts about 71% of the country. conversely, one could also ask the 29% who approve of Bush's performance what medication they are taking...
wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Derangement_Syndrome

Quote:
Krauthammer defined Bush Derangement Syndrome as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency — nay — the very existence of George W. Bush".
daddydirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-08, 05:14 AM   #8
theknife
my name is Ranking Fullstop
 
theknife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
Default

we're talking about the same thing - it's just a question of degree.
theknife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 24th, '04 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 2 25-07-04 07:12 AM






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)