Time to Bomb Iran out of existance

[pisser]

From CNN:

No nuclear halt, warns Khamenei

Ayatollah Khamenei said the West was trying to stop Islamic progress
Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has said his country will press ahead with its nuclear programme.

[theknife]

Originally Posted by pisser

Time to Bomb Iran out of existence

specifically what would you suggest?

[miss_silver]

[Nicobie]

Originally Posted by theknife

specifically what would you suggest?

So,

who do you think will be the 2nd ?

[theknife]

Originally Posted by Nicobie

So,

who do you think will be the 2nd ?

the 2nd what, nic?

[multi]

pisser is just being a good little right wing tool as usual, spouting the first crap that enters his head that will piss off anyone with any common sense. Last time I looked, Israel and the US were busy with a psychological war designed to keep the citizens of the west in a constant state of fear and make radical Islamics do something stupid like use atomic weapons or biological weapons . If they get a few home grown terrorists to blow them selves up along the way thats just a bonus for their propaganda machine.

Forget the conspiricies this is right in your face . Trying repeatedly to prove the events of 9/11 were designed by the US government is futile ,as is trying to prove they let it happen. If people concentrated on the events of the last 150 years that led up to 9/11 as much as the energy that went into constantly pushing that huge rock up that huge hill the reasons for 9/11 would be pretty clear by now. Terrorism is the 'big lie' that has been used quite well .The British and the Jews have known for hundreds of years how the Islamics will fight when pushed into a corner and so it has been easy to align modern politics against them over the last 90 or so years . I see the same brainless drone advocate bombing Iran that was screaming 'nuke' Bagdad and Afganistan a few years ago ,so I take it he means 'nuke' them.
(probably a side effect of too much FOX news)

[miss_silver]

[pisser]

Originally Posted by multi

pisser is just being a good little right wing tool as usual, spouting the first crap that enters his head that will piss off anyone with any common sense. Last time I looked, Israel and the US were busy with a psychological war designed to keep the citizens of the west in a constant state of fear and make radical Islamics do something stupid like use atomic weapons or biological weapons . If they get a few home grown terrorists to blow them selves up along the way thats just a bonus for their propaganda machine.

Forget the conspiricies this is right in your face . Trying repeatedly to prove the events of 9/11 were designed by the US government is futile ,as is trying to prove they let it happen. If people concentrated on the events of the last 150 years that led up to 9/11 as much as the energy that went into constantly pushing that huge rock up that huge hill the reasons for 9/11 would be pretty clear by now. Terrorism is the 'big lie' that has been used quite well .The British and the Jews have known for hundreds of years how the Islamics will fight when pushed into a corner and so it has been easy to align modern politics against them over the last 90 or so years . I see the same brainless drone advocate bombing Iran that was screaming 'nuke' Bagdad and Afganistan a few years ago ,so I take it he means 'nuke' them.
(probably a side effect of too much FOX news)

Spoken like a true terrorist.....

[pisser]

Originally Posted by theknife

specifically what would you suggest?

Whatever it takes to ensure that they do not possess or retain nuclear capabilitites. If that means destroying infrastructure, so be it.

[theknife]

Originally Posted by pisser

Whatever it takes to ensure that they do not possess or retain nuclear capabilitites. If that means destroying infrastructure, so be it.

nobody can ensure that. what does destroying infrastructure do for us? ask israel how destroying arab infrastructure has made them any safer. ask the US how destroying iraqi infrastructure has made us any safer.

after fifty years of fighting jihads of one sort or another, with the net result being an ever escalating islamic fundamentalist threat, after iraq, after afghanistan, after gaza - what on earth gives you the idea that there is a military solution to this problem?

[Drakonix]

The bombs aren't falling in Iran - not yet anyway. Unfortunately, It's probably just a matter of time - it depends on how uncooperative and belligerent the Iranians get.

It is not in the best interests of organized nations to permit Iran to gain nuclear weapons. It's a given that the uranium enrichment they want to do is for development of fissile nuclear weapons - to spread their "Islamic fundamentalism" abroad.

The path of diplomacy is currently being tried in earnest. Trouble is, these "Islamic fundamentalists" do not seem to respond to diplomatic solutions very well. When diplomacy fails, the last resort is often a military one in these kinds of cases.

Iran pokes at Israel and the U.S. in an effort to draw a military confrontation. The main purpose of that is to manufacture an excuse for even more acts of "Islamic fundamentalism" (a.k.a. terrorism).

Iran should be careful what they wish for, because they might get it - and they won't like it. Iran thinks the underground hardened facilities are safe - but they are not. The U.S., The U.K., and Israel have the tools to take out those facilities if need be.

Military action against terrorism has been considerably more effective than the opponents of military action in Iraq and Afghanistan are admitting.

what does destroying infrastructure do for us?

In a war scenario, destruction of infrastructure hampers the ability of the opponent forces to fight back. You take out power plants, communications, and other things that the opponent forces need to continue to wage war. Conventional wars are won by killing the opponent forces and blowing up the things that they need. Unfortunately, non-combatants (civilians) are often effected by the same infrastructure damage.

Generally speaking, war sucks - that's why diplomacy is tried first.

[pisser]

Originally Posted by theknife

nobody can ensure that. what does destroying infrastructure do for us? ask israel how destroying arab infrastructure has made them any safer. ask the US how destroying iraqi infrastructure has made us any safer.

after fifty years of fighting jihads of one sort or another, with the net result being an ever escalating islamic fundamentalist threat, after iraq, after afghanistan, after gaza - what on earth gives you the idea that there is a military solution to this problem?

Israel cannot reason with people that want to DESTROY them.

Political solutions just won't happen.

If not political, what other option do they have, kissing more arab enemy ass?

Get real, clueless. It is a harsh reality, but that's the way it is.

[theknife]

Originally Posted by pisser

Israel cannot reason with people that want to DESTROY them.

Political solutions just won't happen.

If not political, what other option do they have, kissing more arab enemy ass?

Get real, clueless. It is a harsh reality, but that's the way it is.

the harsh reality is that nothing in the Middle East has ever been solved militarily. so when geniuses like you toss around bumper-sticker sound bites like "we need to take out Iraq/Iran/Syria", it means you have no clue and have learned nothing.

[Nicobie]

no oil?