P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Peer to Peer
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-02-23, 07:34 AM   #1
JackSpratts
 
JackSpratts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,013
Default Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - February 18th, ’23

Since 2002































Early Edition



February 18th, 2023
















Z-Library Returns, Aims to Avoid Seizures by Giving each User a Secret URL

This weekend, the pirate e-book site welcomed users back with unique domains.
Ashley Belanger

Last fall, the US Department of Justice pushed the e-book pirate site Z-Library onto the dark web after charging its alleged operators with criminal copyright infringement, wire fraud, and money laundering. Back then, Z-Library users—including many college students who relied on the site as a source for free textbooks—weren’t sure if Z-Library would be able to keep operating. That’s why this weekend, thousands of Z-Library fans rejoiced when Z-Library officially staged its comeback on public-access Internet—by launching a universal login page and setting up secret personal domains for users.

A Z-Library blog post from Saturday viewed by 21,000 users announced the “great news” and prompted users to access Z-Library using their regular login credentials at a new link. Once users log in, they’re redirected to a personal domain they can use to access close to 12 million free e-books on Z-Library without using encrypted networks like Tor. A second domain is also sent by email. At the time of login, users are prompted to check a box promising, “I will keep my domains in secret.”

TorrentFreak reported that Z-Library’s tactic of assigning unique domains creates “a technical setup that anticipates future enforcement action” and will help the site mitigate disruptions by deploying backup domains as needed to avert domain seizures. In November, US officials seized 200 domain names connected to Z-Library, TorrentFreak reported, and to prevent officials from succeeding with future enforcement actions, Z-Library is now depending on users to keep their personal domains private.

“Don’t disclose your personal domain and don’t share the link to your domain, as it is protected with your own password and cannot be accessed by other users,” Z-Library wrote in the blog post.

Ars could not immediately reach Z-Library to comment, but a test confirmed that it is now possible to log in to Z-Library without using Tor or an encrypted I2P network layer. Ars also confirmed that Z-Library is currently assigning two personal domains per user.

Z-Library said in its blog post that not all users currently have access to the universal login page but that the site is working on a solution. For now, any users who experience issues accessing Z-Library to retrieve their personal domains can still “use TOR/I2P to log in to your account, copy the URL of your personal domain and use it in your regular browser,” Z-Library advised.

Time will tell if Z-Library’s strategy will be effective at stopping authorities globally from blocking Z-Library. It’s likely that any authorities monitoring the pirate site are already aware of some of Z-Library’s new domains, TorrentFreak reported. To help users keep tabs on what’s happening with the site, including news on domains, Z-Library set up a Telegram channel.

The e-book pirate site’s comeback will likely not be celebrated by authors, many of whom complained to a US trade representative last October that “accessing pirate e-book sites is easier than ever” and is causing “incalculable and truly devastating” income loss to publishers and authors.

But hundreds of users welcomed the site’s return, with people posting enthusiastic comments on Z-Library’s blog, like “I can't live without Z-Library” and “this resource is invaluable!”
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...-a-secret-url/





Canadians Still Love to Pirate Music and Video: Report
Alan Cross

I’ll admit it: If you go through the files on my computer, you’ll find songs that I downloaded from Napster and other illegal file-sharing sites. At the time — for me it was 2001-2003 — downloading songs illegally was seen as a goof, even harmless. How could a couple of downloaded tracks bother a multi-national record label or some millionaire rock stars?

That attitude was totally, utterly wrong, of course, and by the time I woke up to this reality, the recorded music industry was starting to spiral downwards. Fast. CD sales had begun to plummet and it became clear that piracy was one of the big contributing factors.

My pirate ways were killed forever by iTunes. It was just easier to pay 99 cents/$1.29 for a high-quality audio file than endure terrible sounding, often incomplete, sometimes virus-ridden MP3s downloaded from god knows where. Who wanted the hassle of finding torrents and seeding sites with new material?

Then there was the issue of metadata, making sure that the songs were labelled correctly. Oftentimes, a torrented song would have the wrong title, spell the name of the artist wrong, or not include all the necessary tags. You have to then organize the songs somehow in your library. Besides being wrong and immoral, music piracy took too much work.

I’ve since amassed thousands of legal digital downloads. As I write this, iTunes tells me I have 79,640 items (564.5 gigs) in my library. Not all are paid-for downloads, of course. There are many, many CD rips along with other audio such as interviews, with much being associated with my work with The Ongoing History of New Music.

When streaming started to take off in Canada around 2010, most believed that this would be the end of music piracy. Why would you bother to steal something when you could: (a) pay a modest monthly fee and have all the music you could possibly want; and (b) sign up for the free tier on Spotify and for the price of having to listen to a few ads, pay nothing at all for all the music in the universe?

Piracy was conquered. Except it wasn’t. And Canadians are still stealing stuff.

According to the most recent report by the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), a group that represents the interests of not just the recorded music industry, but TV, movies, videogame publishers, and more, we Canadians are thieves. At 241 pages, it’s a long report, but it can be summarized in this statement: “It is nearly impossible to overstate the magnitude of the piracy problem in Canada.”

Drawing from information in a report from the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (which administers all the .ca domains, among other things), Canadians are some of the worst when it comes to pilfering American copyrighted works. We already watch a lot of TV and movies and listen to plenty of music, but the reports contend that the real numbers are higher due to people consuming pirated content.

I quote: “Evidence persists, however, that the digital marketplace for copyrighted content in Canada continues to face challenges in realizing its full potential due to competition from illicit online sources. In 2022, 22.4% of Canadians accessed pirate services.”

Nearly a quarter of us? Wow.

We’re doing a lot of stream-ripping, apparently. This involves using software to record the stream of a YouTube video or songs streamed from Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, or any other DSP (Digital Streaming Provider). “Dozens of websites, software programs, and apps offering stream-ripping services find an eager marketplace in Canada,” says the report.

It continues: “Use of peer-to-peer (P2P) sites remains high, with BitTorrent indexing sites including Rarbg, The Pirate Bay, and 1337x popular in Canada. Cyberlocker sites, such as Mega, Uptobox, GoFile, and Rapidgator, are also a common way to illicitly access recorded music.”

Theft of music is a big issue, but video piracy is where the majority of the action is. The report says that we’re “actively involved” in all the different ways we can get around digital locks and technological protection measures.

Pirate IPTV (Internet Protocol Television) services — sometimes seen advertised on light poles at intersections — have plenty of customers. And chances are you know a guy who knows a guy who can fix you up with more free TV than you can handle with a special set-top box. Just Google “IPTV Canada” and watch what comes up. I’ve even seen these boxes for sale in retail stores.

More from the report: “Mimicking the look and feel of legitimate streaming services, infringing streaming websites continue to overtake P2P sites as a highly popular destination for Canadians seeking premium content in both English and French. … Canadian piracy operators remain involved in the coding and development of infringing add-ons and Android application packages (APKs) that enable subscription piracy services and mass-market [set-top boxes] to access streaming services without authorization.

“Few resources are dedicated to prosecutions of piracy cases; prosecutors generally lack specialized training in prosecuting such offenses, and too often dismiss the file or plead the cases out, resulting in weak penalties.”

So what’s being done? The IIPA believes that the RCMP is too busy to investigate the situation. Local police forces also have their hands full with day-to-day policing. There have been a few crackdowns here and there, but nothing to really dent the pirate market. The IIPA is demanding more federal funding to fight piracy, the creation of specialized groups to pursue illegal IPTV sites/sellers, and is encouraging Canadian officials to work together with their American counterparts.

And you thought that Canadians were so nice and law-abiding.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9473995/c...y-music-video/





Fans Have Become So Frustrated With Ezra Miller They’re Openly Declaring They Will Pirate The Flash Rather Than Line His Pockets

This is where pirating comes in
Minhaz Ahamed

Ever since the video of Ezra Miller assaulting a female fan surfaced on the internet, there has been chaos in DCEU. The incident that took place in April 2020 is still a burning topic among fans. They were quite vocal about their opinion on the actor, and raised their issue regarding the casting of Ezra Miller in The Flash solo movie. But what was not expected is DCEU ignoring fans’ appeals and continuing to work with Miller.

The movie is set to release and fans have once again taken it to twitter to express their frustration due to lack of action by DC Studios.

The Shocking Incident Involving Ezra Miller: What Really Happened in Reykjavik?

Back in 2020, the DCEU community was in for a shock when an incident involving actor Ezra Miller made headlines. On April 6, a video went viral that showed Miller choking a female fan before dragging her to the ground in a bar in Reykjavik, Iceland. The altercation had actually taken place on April 1st, but the video was filmed by a bystander and started circulating in the media a few days later.

The video shows a young woman approaching Miller, who uses they/them pronouns, as she’s dancing towards them, and Miller can be heard saying,

“Oh, you wanna fight? That’s what you wanna do?”

The actor was seen grabbing the fan by the throat. The video cuts out as the woman is thrown to the ground and bystanders can be heard trying to defuse the situation.

Ezra Miller was a beloved figure in the DCEU community, having played the Flash in the DCEU films and appearing as Credence Barebone in the Fantastic Beasts franchise. Fans were initially in disbelief and thought the video might be a joke, but it was later confirmed as genuine by Variety. The incident took place in a bar that Miller frequented when they visited the Icelandic capital, and the bar’s owner added that the actor had to be escorted out afterwards.

DCEU Community Reacts to the Casting of Ezra Miller in The Flash

Fans of the DCEU were quick to react to the news and many were left feeling shocked and upset. Some even called for Miller to be removed from the upcoming The Flash movie. Despite the outcry from fans, the DCEU did not take any action against the actor, and have continued with the film, which is set to release this year.

Miller’s continued involvement in the film has left many fans feeling unheard and disheartened, and the situation has created a rift in the DCEU community.

Many took to social media to express their disappointment about the lack of action, with some even declaring that even if they want to watch the movie due to other cast members, they will pirate the movie rather than line Miller’s pockets.

The reaction from the DCEU community and fans reflects a growing sense of disappointment and disillusionment with Miller’s behavior. While some have expressed concern for the young woman involved in the altercation, others are more focused on the impact that the incident may have on Ezra

It remains to be seen how things will play out in the future, but for now, the incident from 2020 is still a source of frustration for many fans.

The Flash is set to release on June 16, 2023.
https://fandomwire.com/this-is-where...e-his-pockets/





Google Fiber Launches 5Gbps Service for $125 per Month

It has symmetrical downloads and uploads, but it’s only available in four cities at launch.
Will Shanklin

Google Fiber is launching the 5Gbps internet plan it began testing in October. The service will initially cover four cities, but Google says the $125-per-month service will expand to other areas later this year.

The new plan is available today in Kansas City, West Des Moines and Fiber’s Utah cities. It has symmetrical upload and download rates, an upgraded 10 Gig Fiber Jack (the small box housing the fiber cable’s entrance into your home), professional installation, a WiFi 6 router and up to two mesh network extenders.

Although 5Gbps speeds could be overkill for most households, they could come in handy for creative professionals, gamers or others who need minimal latency or transfer large files frequently. For example, a 150GB Microsoft Flight Simulator download that takes 11 minutes at 2Gbps would only take about three minutes at 6Gbps (under ideal conditions, anyway).

The upgraded speeds are part of Google’s rejuvenated focus on Fiber. The company also recently announced its first network expansion in years. But, perhaps more crucially, it reestablishes Fiber as an industry disrupter pushing competitors to upgrade speeds and lower prices (maybe) on existing plans. Comcast already offers 6Gbps service in some areas, but it costs a whopping $300 and doesn’t include symmetrical uploads.

Google also reiterated that Fiber’s 8Gbps option, also announced late last year, is still “coming soon.” That service will also include symmetrical uploads and downloads.

You're now more likely to have meaningful choice for fast fiber internet service. Frontier has introduced a symmetrical 5Gbps plan (that is, 5Gbps for uploads and downloads) across all its fiber markets in the US. The company claims it's the first "major" provider to manage the feat. You'll have to pay $155 per month (which includes installation and a router), or $55 more than the 2Gbps tier. However, it might be worth the outlay if you regularly download massive files or share your data with other heavy-duty users in your household.

You'll need a WiFi 6e router and supporting devices, like the Pixel 7 or 2023 MacBook Pro, to make use of the extra speed without relying on 10Gbps Ethernet. Frontier estimates that it takes less than two minutes to download a 100-minute 8K movie.

Whether or not Frontier offers the best deal depends on the rivals in your area. AT&T's 5Gbps plan has been available for a year, but will cost $180. Google Fiber is on the cusp of offering 8Gbps for $150, but it covers only a handful of cities. Frontier may well beat cable companies, though. Comcast already has 6Gbps service in some areas, but the $300 per month pricing and non-symmetric uploads make it less practical.

The higher price for 5Gbps service may not be thrilling if 2Gbps already seemed expensive. Even so, the rollout suggests competition is heating up among multi-gig internet providers. That's good news for customers — you may see more aggressive performance or pricing as telecoms jockey for your business.
https://www.engadget.com/google-fibe...214732336.html





Biden FCC Nominee Slams Critics, Says ISPs Shouldn’t Get to Choose Regulators

"It is critical for at least one member of the FCC to be a consumer advocate."
Jon Brodkin

President Biden's long-stalled nominee to the Federal Communications Commission fired back at her critics today, saying that the telecom industry shouldn't be allowed to choose its own regulators.

"I believe deeply that regulated entities should not choose their regulator," Sohn said in prepared testimony for a Senate Commerce Committee nomination hearing today. "Unfortunately, that is the exact intent of the past 15 months of false and misleading attacks on my record and my character. My industry opponents have hidden behind dark money groups and surrogates because they fear a pragmatic, pro-competition, pro-consumer policymaker who will support policies that will bring more, faster, and lower-priced broadband and new voices to your constituents."

Biden first nominated Sohn, a longtime consumer advocate and former FCC official, on October 26, 2021. The full Senate never voted on whether to confirm Sohn as an FCC commissioner, and Biden renominated her last month. With the FCC deadlocked at two Democrats and two Republicans, Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel hasn't been able to pursue any major regulation of an industry that was deregulated during the Trump era.

"The FCC has been without a majority for the entirety of the Biden administration—over two years—at a time when closing the digital divide is front and center," Sohn's testimony said. "There are too many important issues in front of the commission to lack a full complement of members, including improving the broadband maps, fixing the Universal Service Fund, closing the homework gap, ensuring fair access to broadband, and protecting consumers' privacy. Americans deserve a full FCC where I could play a critical role in addressing every one of these, but time is of the essence."

Nominee: FCC needs a consumer advocate

Sohn co-founded the consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge in 2001 and led the organization until taking a position as counselor for then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler in 2013. She has continued to argue for consumer-protection regulations since leaving the FCC in 2016.

"I believe it is critical for at least one member of the FCC to be a consumer advocate who has spent a career not beholden to any interest but that of the public," Sohn's testimony said. "I've certainly worked with industry toward common goals and many in industry are among the over 400 groups that support my confirmation, but my roots and my heart are with the everyday Americans the FCC by law is tasked to serve."

Republicans such as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) lined up against Sohn in her previous nomination hearings, claiming she would use a post at the FCC to censor conservatives. Contradicting those criticisms, executives at conservative news networks Newsmax and One America News Network supported Sohn's nomination and praised her longtime commitment to free speech.

The National Association of Broadcasters denounced Sohn for being a former board member at Locast, a nonprofit online TV service that shut down after losing a copyright case launched by major broadcast networks. Comcast apparently lobbied against Sohn behind the scenes despite not publicly opposing the nomination.

Sohn faced “homophobic and sexist fearmongering”

More recently, conservative media outlets attacked Sohn for being on the board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation because of the group's battle against the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA), which the EFF called unconstitutional censorship of speech on the Internet. A Daily Mail headline last month said, "Biden's FCC nominee Gigi Sohn sits on board of nonprofit that wants to uphold online sex work and that honored an OnlyFans dominatrix who boasts about urinating on faces." A Fox News headline described the EFF as a "group that opposes anti-sex trafficking efforts."

Sohn, who is being joined by her wife and their daughter at today's hearing, has been "met with homophobic tropes and attacks against herself and her family," a recent letter from advocacy groups to senators said. "Homophobic and sexist fearmongering should have no place in the consideration of Gigi's qualifications... We call upon every member of the Senate to condemn homophobia and sexism and consider Gigi's nomination on its merits," the letter said.

A spokesperson for the Senate Commerce Committee's Democratic leadership said today, "We've seen a campaign of meritless smears and attacks against Gigi Sohn from opponents who clearly do not want to see a pro-competition, pro-consumer expert on the commission."

For the cable and telecom industries, trying to block Sohn's nomination is about avoiding consumer-protection regulations. "Ms. Sohn is one of the leading advocates for policies that amount to regulatory overreach in the broadband market," the US Chamber of Commerce said in a letter to senators yesterday. The business group also called Sohn's support of government-owned broadband networks "alarming."

"It would be a mistake to embrace a public option for broadband instead of focusing on private sector providers who have helped the United States lead the world in quality and resilience," the Chamber of Commerce said.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...se-regulators/





Stop Emailing Yourself: the Best File Sharing Options Across Devices
Duncan Pike

File sharing has come a long way. If you’re still emailing yourself images or documents, whether from PC to mobile device or vice versa, we’re here to tell you there are a lot of options you could be using instead. Most of these don’t require much more effort than the emailing ways of yesteryear.

However, all these options for file sharing bring their own set of requirements and limitations. Some companies don’t like to play nice with others – looking at you, Apple.

Additionally, many methods require your devices to be on the same local network or have an active internet connection. When that isn’t possible, you might have to go old school.

File sharing over the wire

Before Bluetooth or infrared wireless file sharing was a thing, the only way to locally share files was over a physical cable plugged into both devices. These days, most people only use a cable for charging purposes but it still remains one of the fastest and most reliable file-sharing methods. Loadshedding knocked out your internet? No problem. As long as both devices have power, the transfer should go through. How successful that is will depend on your devices and cable.

Trying to make sense of USB versions across their many naming revisions is the fastest known route to a self-induced headache. The latest widely supported USB version, USB 3.2, supports speeds from 5Gb/s – 20Gb/s (gigabits per second). This version has had several names over the years so the only way to be certain you’re getting the one you want is to check the transfer speeds. To get the faster speeds, you’ll need to be using a USB-C cable and both your devices and the cable will need to be certified for the speed, else you’re limited to the speed of the slowest component.

If you’re trying to transfer a file from your iPhone to a PC not made by Apple without using the internet, you’ll need a cable with a Lightning connector on one end and USB-A or USB-C connector on the other. But there are a few more steps you’ll need to take. Apple doesn’t want iPhone users rummaging through their iPhone’s file system so you’ll have to use iTunes to sync your content.

For folks with an Apple PC and an Android smartphone, Android File Transfer is the go-between you’ll need. It’s relatively simple to set up and use. Download it on your macOS device and connect your devices with a cable. Then you’ll have access to all the folders and files on your Android device with the ability to transfer files between the two.

Alternatively, you could replace the cable with a removable storage option, like a flash drive or SD card and reader, if you don’t have an iPhone. Some flash drives and SD card readers have both a USB-A and USB-C connector so you can use the single gadget between your smartphone and laptop or PC if the latter doesn’t feature a USB-C port.

If you opt for this method, you’ll need to make sure your chosen media is using a file format that’s supported by both devices. We recommend exFAT, it’s supported by Windows, macOS, and Android.

Ditching the cables

If you felt personally attacked by the headline, we’re not sorry. For well-meaning office workers that spend most of their day in an email client (Gmail, Mail, or Outlook), to the point where they’ve set up mailing rules and even know keyboard shortcuts, sending themselves a file in an email still isn’t the best option. But at least they’re guaranteed to see it.

Today’s equivalent of this would be sending yourself a message on your instant messaging service of choice. WhatsApp and Telegram are available across all platforms and support self-messaging but, as with emailing yourself, you’re limited by what you can send. If you’ve got a large video file you need to transfer, none of these options will work. They aren’t immune to the other problems we highlighted earlier.

What if you lose power or network connection on the device you’re using to send the mail or message? Well, then it will only go through when your power or connection is restored. You’re also beholden to your email or mobile service provider. They aren’t as bulletproof as you might think. This brings us to…

Bluetooth – all platforms

While Bluetooth is the grandfather technology that enables many of these other methods to function, using the tech at its base level is still an option. It will work with pretty much any combination of devices as it’s supported on Windows PCs, Android phones, Apple PCs, and iPhones. But it isn’t without its drawbacks — namely transfer speed, reliability, and proximity.

Transfer speed will depend on the Bluetooth version your devices are running. Again, you’ll be limited by the slowest device. But even if your smartphone and PC support the latest version, Bluetooth 5.3, the transfer speed will max out at around 16Mb/s (megabits per second).

Bluetooth can also suffer from interference from other devices operating at the same frequency (2.4GHz). This could mean your transfer doesn’t reach maximum speed or it could fail altogether.

WiFi Direct – Windows to Android/Android to Android

You can think of this one as a modern alternative to Bluetooth. As with Bluetooth, and like the name implies, this allows your devices to wirelessly connect directly to each other using the WiFi standard. This means you don’t need an internet connection to transfer files. The maximum transfer rate is much faster than Bluetooth, up to 250Mb/s. It also uses the same security protocols that your home WiFi uses (WPS and WPA/WPA2) so your transfers are more secure. But both devices will need to support it. If you’ve got an Apple PC, you’ll have to look at another option.

AirDrop – iOS to macOS

If you’ve already bought into Apple’s ecosystem and have an iPhone and MacBook, we probably don’t need to tell you about AirDrop. This is, by far, the easiest method of file sharing between Apple devices. There is no initial setup required. All you need to do is sign into your Apple ID on both devices (which you will have done already) and make sure both have WiFi and Bluetooth enabled.

Nearby Share – Windows to Android/Android to Android

This is Google’s version of AirDrop. WiFi and Bluetooth are required on both devices, but unlike Apple’s tech, it’s possible to share files without a Google account. Having one does make things a whole lot easier though. Signing in removes the need to manually accept the transfer request. Nearby Share isn’t as fast as WiFi Direct but is supported by a wider range of Android devices.

Microsoft Phone Link – Windows to Android

For users that don’t want to limit themselves to Apple’s ecosystem, Windows comes with a fairly robust solution for pairing your PC and your phone. Formerly known as Your Phone and limited to Samsung Galaxy devices, the since-renamed Microsoft Phone Link now supports any device running

Android 7.0 or later.

You aren’t only limited to file sharing either. You can use it to make phone calls from your PC, get smartphone notifications on your desktop, run apps installed on your phone from your PC, and it even supports screen mirroring on some devices.

Intel Unison – Windows to iPhone/Android

If the last one sounded like something you’d use but you own an iPhone, you’re in luck. Intel (of all companies) recently released something similar called Intel Unison. The setup is as straightforward as Microsoft Phone Link and it includes all of the same features to some extent. You can transfer files between devices, send and receive messages (including iMessage) from your iPhone using your PC, and make or receive calls. Your notifications will also appear across devices, but they aren’t actionable from your PC.

An important thing to note, Unison is only supposed to work on laptops with Intel’s 12th-gen ‘Evo certified’ processors but it has been known to work on older Intel CPUs and even AMD CPUs. But if it isn’t officially supported on your PC, don’t expect a lot of official help if you run into a problem.

Cloud storage and third-party programs

All of the methods we’ve covered so far are specific to a certain combination of devices. If you’re after something that will work across all devices and platforms, you shouldn’t forget about cloud storage as you probably already use or have access to it in some form. Apple has iCloud, Google has Google Drive, and Microsoft has OneDrive. There’s also Dropbox.

All of these can be accessed through your web browser but also offer apps you can download and install on your Windows or macOS PC and your Android or iOS smartphone. The drawback, other than the need for an internet connection, is that it introduces an extra step like using a flash drive. The process involves uploading a file from one end and downloading it from the other. But it’s still an option.

For something more direct, there are other third-party apps that allow over-the-air file sharing. There are a dizzying number of these so to narrow your focus we recommend starting with PairDrop, LocalSend, Send Anywhere, and Shareit. We’ve used those before and liked them, plus they don’t limit your platform or device options. We recommend trying them all out until you find the one you like the most.
https://stuff.co.za/2023/02/14/best-...cross-devices/

















Until next week,

- js.



















Current Week In Review





Recent WiRs -

February 11th, February 4th, January 28th, January 21st

Jack Spratts' Week In Review is published every Friday. Submit letters, articles, press releases, comments, questions etc. in plain text English to jackspratts (at) lycos (dot) com. Submission deadlines are Thursdays @ 1400 UTC. Please include contact info. The right to publish all remarks is reserved.


"The First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public."
- Hugo Black
__________________
Thanks For Sharing
JackSpratts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 16th, '11 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 13-07-11 06:43 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 9th, '11 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 06-07-11 05:36 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 30th, '10 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 27-01-10 07:49 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 16th, '10 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 13-01-10 09:02 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - December 5th, '09 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 0 02-12-09 08:32 AM






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)