P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Political Asylum
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-09-04, 11:24 AM   #21
JackSpratts
 
JackSpratts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toy boy
for some reason you ( the american people) seem to think your dead are more important...
i see your point but i doubt it's unique to americans, we just happen to be very visible atm. i think it's as old as tribalism and now expanded to large scale groups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by toy boy
second and please allow me to state the obvious, i think it is easeir to relate to your fellow country men than to some poor slob thousands of miles away
that's universal behaviour found all over the panet. it starts at your body. most people would be more upset to hear their doctor tell them they have to have a finger removed than hearing hundreds of thousands of people died in an earthquake halfway around the world.

in any event i think i may have stated that our iraqi invasion could lead to consequences that ultimately led to less stability and less security. with newly radicalized islamics by the tens of thousands now vowing revenge on us (among other things) there is little evidence that's not case.

- js.
JackSpratts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-04, 05:11 PM   #22
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theknife
so what happens when Putin invokes the Bush Doctrine, justifying a Russian attack on any country that makes him uncomfortable?
aren't they doing that already?
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-04, 05:44 PM   #23
miss_silver
Keebeck Canuck
 
miss_silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Close to a border of LUNATICS
Posts: 1,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by multi
aren't they doing that already?
So true

Just let chechnia be an independent state or country, clamping down on it will not help the matter, only will create more terrorists acts or worse, more terrorists.
miss_silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-04, 06:16 PM   #24
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miss_silver
So true

Just let chechnia be an independent state or country, clamping down on it will not help the matter, only will create more terrorists acts or worse, more terrorists.
its either oil rich or has a pipeline..i cant remember wich..


A mountainous region, Chechnya has important oil deposits, as well as natural gas, limestone, gypsum, sulphur, and other minerals. Its mineral waters have made it a spa center. Major production includes oil, petrochemicals, oil-field equipment, foods, wines, and fruits. For centuries, the Chechen people's history and relationship with the regional power, Russia, has been full of turmoil.
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Chechnya.asp
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-09-04, 01:00 AM   #25
Fantom
Down like a clown Charlie Br.. Down like a clown Charlie Br..
 
Fantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West Aussie
Posts: 779
Default

so, doing exactly what terrorists demand is going to reduce future terrorist attacks? I'd have thought that would just encourage them....

IMO, governments need to remove the attraction to terrorism by ensuring that nothing is ever, ever gained from it. And yes, having a foreign policy that isn't fundamentally evil helps a lot too.

Unfortunately for any innocent Chechnians that were peacefully seeking independence, they're basically screwed. Russia (and the rest of the world) can't conceed an inch to them, not without showing every desperate lunatic out there that terrorism produces positive results.
Fantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-09-04, 02:21 AM   #26
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default

less dependency on oil would help..i really dont think i am saying give into anything..makes me wonder tho..is sharon giving in by giving back land israel had stolen?
i dont think so..the attacks will go on regardless..but i am sure everyone can see its the right thing to do..but then again the land probably wont be given back to those that were actualy displaced
imo

when its time to pull out troops from iraq..will that be giving in..maybe? US pulling out of saudi arabia ?
when its the conservatives in power,and they do it.. it will be.. well done mission accomplished..anything the left tries to do will be cutting and running ,i guess..
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-09-04, 05:32 AM   #27
legion
I took both pills.
 
legion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miss_silver
So true

Just let chechnia be an independent state or country, clamping down on it will not help the matter, only will create more terrorists acts or worse, more terrorists.
but by giving in they risk that every other tiny little state within the russian federation - that has no economy of their own other than sheep ..... oh god not antoher Australia j/k - will seek independence too, making the region more unstable.

And Multi allthough i do not support israel or the palestinians in this matter, Israel did offer them them the return of 98% of all the land they occupied ( camp david treaty? i am not sure on this one) i think that is a fair offer that was rejected by mister yasar arafat himself
__________________
Some people exist just to annoy me
legion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-09-04, 06:11 PM   #28
jcat
Mooo?
 
jcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 595
Default

Quote:
FOR many Russians it was a week of funerals, mourning and horrified disbelief. The reaction of Vladimir Putin to the deaths in Beslan, however, has been rather different: to go on the offensive.

The Russian president ordered his country’s Federal Security Service to offer an unprecedented reward of 300 million rubles (£5.7m) for information that could help "neutralise" Shamil Basayev, the Chechen warlord said to have masterminded the school hostage siege in which more than 300 people died, and of separatist former Chechen president Aslan Maskhadov.

In words which echoed those of President George Bush after the September 11 attacks, Russia’s chief of general staff, Col-Gen Yuri Baluyevsky, also weighed in by declaring: "We will liquidate terrorist bases in any region of the world."

On the international propaganda front, Britain was blasted for granting refugee status to Akhmed Zakayev, an envoy for Maskadov.

"Granting asylum to people involved in terrorism - and Russia has documented evidence of this - undermines the unity of the anti-terrorist coalition," foreign minister Sergey Lavrov warned.

The first consequence of the events in Beslan has been to make Putin even more determined to reject out of hand any modification of his long-standing policy to refuse all dialogue with Chechen separatists.

Talking to a group of foreign journalists at his country house outside Moscow last week, he accused the West of double standards. "Why do you not meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks; ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace?" he asked.

It was Putin’s first meeting with foreigners since the Beslan massacre, and was designed to signal to the world that Putin regards the military campaign in Chechnya as part of the war against international terrorism.

No one doubts that Putin genuinely shares the public dismay that is sweeping through Russia as a result of the horrendous denouement at Beslan. Moreover, his hardline rhetoric has resonance with ordinary Russians, most of whom are much more concerned about their personal security than in negotiating with the Chechens.

Russian public opinion hardened further last week when forensic examination of 10 of the bodies of the hostage-takers revealed that six were Chechen and four were from neighbouring Ingushetia - also a Muslim region.

But Putin’s tough talk also has a deeper purpose. Calling on all Russians to rally round their leader in this hour of need, as Putin did in a televised address to the nation last week, happens to dovetail perfectly in to his own long-term plan to concentrate political and economic power in his own hands.

Russia has endured a dozen major terrorist attacks in recent years, with massive loss of life. In the past two weeks alone, more than 400 people have been killed. As acts of terrorism have multiplied, so Putin’s political control has grown steadily.

Since he became president, Putin has sought to stamp out any challenges to his power by creating a pliant parliament, imposing new restrictions on regional governors and cracking down on independent TV stations. It has now reached the stage where public criticism of him is muted; just how far was revealed in the remarkable unwillingness of leading Russian politicians and bureaucrats to make any public statements about the Beslan siege.

Members of the Duma did not even break into their summer holidays to hold an emergency debate on the school crisis.

"Institutions have been dramatically weakened. Public politics is generally over in Russia, and this is the result of Putin’s rule," said Masha Lipman, a political analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Centre.

"His consistent policy is not to have any political opposition inside."

Igor Bunin, director of the Moscow-based Centre for Political Technologies, added: "Our system has been transformed in to one that is more administrative than political. In this kind of system, everyone waits for the president to speak first in a crisis."

Putin is a political centralist, and ever since he came to power in 2000 he has systematically chipped away at the lax decentralised system that existed under his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, though Putin himself describes his type of government as "controlled democracy", arguing that it is the only way in which a vast, disorganised country such as Russia can be run, there is ever more control and less democracy.

First up on Putin’s hitlist were Russia’s 89 regional governors, who exercised substantial autonomous powers. In his first year in office he had them removed from their seats in the Federation Council - the upper chamber of the Russian parliament.

At the same time he signed a decree carving Russia into seven enormous federal districts, each with its own governor general - all appointed by Putin. His distrust of regional élites has even extended to transferring the control of federal courts away from the regions to Moscow.

Though his United Russia party already holds a two-thirds majority in the lower house of the State Duma, Putin plans to cut the number of independent members. Half the members of the Duma are still chosen by constituencies, where independents find it easier to gain election. But the Kremlin wants to abolish constituency voting and have all members chosen by parties.

The consequence of these changes is that Putin has acquired enormous power of patronage throughout Russia. He used it ruthlessly during his campaign for re-election earlier this year, in which he won 71% of the vote. The election was condemned as unfair by international observers.

Then there is the media. Tight control of information is an important government tool in Russia once again, just as it was in the former Soviet Union.

A year after coming to power, Putin blatantly revoked the operating licences of several television stations without even the pretence of approval from the Duma.

All three major television networks are now run by the state, although they are offset somewhat by Russia’s newspapers and by lively internet channels.

Russian television was told to go easy on the grim footage from Beslan, while officials were understating the death toll and overstating the effectiveness of the special forces deployed to end the confrontation.

Soon after explosions and gunfire rocked the school, the main television channel shifted away from the scene of mayhem and broadcast a soap opera about Second World War spies. It was left to internet sites to offer fast-breaking first-hand accounts.

Putin has even jailed journalists with especially ‘dangerous’ views. In early 2000, journalist Andrei Babitsky of Radio Liberty, which is sponsored by the US, was arrested.

Babitsky had criticised the Russian government’s incursions into Chechen villages and its bombardment of Grozny. Russian authorities arrested and beat him, and he was held for several months.

Last week Raf Shakirov, the editor of Izvestia, was dismissed because his weekend edition ran a full front cover photograph of a man carrying a half-naked girl out of the school in Beslan. Inside the paper, the headline read: "The whole floor was strewn with the bodies of dead children."

The owner of the paper, the metals magnate Vladimir Potanin, prides himself on good relations with the Kremlin. Shakirov’s front page was at odds with official attempts to play down the horror at Beslan.

The dismissal is ominous because the Russian printed press has, until now, managed to maintain an element of freedom in its coverage, compared with the tightly controlled television.

Then there is the economy. The arrest and trial of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, head of Russia’s biggest oil conglomerate, Yukos, is designed to warn Russia’s other wealthy oligarchs that Putin will not tolerate their funding of opposition parties, as Khodorkovsky did.

The Khodorkovsky case smacks of hypocrisy. Tax evasion is a massive problem for Russia. But the legal loopholes exploited by Yukos were exactly the same as those used by many other companies, whose officials have not been prosecuted because they have done nothing to upset Putin. The courts even rejected 11 offers by the company to pay up, demonstrating that the government is not interested in collecting the money but in seizing the company’s assets.

The cost to investor confidence in Russia has already been enormous, and foreign investors are taking flight. Yukos produces 2% of the world’s oil, putting it level with Kuwait. Yet Russia, the third biggest oil producer in the world, is haemorrhaging funds at a time when the oil price has been at a record high.

There is also a disturbing expansion of the influence of the security services. Security service personnel, including Putin’s old chums from his days as a KGB officer, are now being given key positions in industry - a move which could spell disaster for the Russian economy, according to many observers.

"Putin’s power base consists of secret service officers and state enterprise managers - groups known for corruption and secrecy rather than market reform and transparency," says Anders Aslund, director of the Russian and Eurasian Programme at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "Russia has become structurally similar to Latin America."

"This shift back to state control is a real threat to the Russian economy because all the big success stories in recent years are to be found in the flourishing private sector, while the state is patently failing.

"Far from reforming the secret police and the state monopoly companies, Putin has made them the basis of his regime. Privatisation has all but stalled."
mooooooooooooooooooooooo
jcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-04, 01:12 AM   #29
floydian slip
===\/------/\===
 
floydian slip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,704
Default

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
floydian slip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-04, 01:48 PM   #30
Sinner
--------------------
 
Sinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,379
Default

Just some news of the Aftermath in Russia...


RUSSIA: Beslan Aftermath



September 24, 2004: Russian police have arrested over 10,000 people in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in the North Ossetian town of Beslan. About half of those rounded up are people living in Moscow illegally. In Russia, you have to be registered with the government, as living at a particular address, to be "legal." In the Soviet period, you needed government permission to move your residence, or even travel long distances. The Russian legislature is considering reintroducing some of these restrictions. The low pay scales for police and security personnel is also being examined, as the low pay is given as a major reason for the widespread accepting of bribes by the police. It was a bribed cop that got suicide bombers on Russian aircraft last month.

September 23, 2004: In Chechnya, military operations against rebel groups continue at a high level (in response to the Beslan murders). Six rebels were killed in Chechnya today, and their camp examined for weapons, equipment and documents.

September 22, 2004: Diplomatic pressure is being turned up on Britain and Qatar, to get these countries to give up Chechen rebel leaders they have granted political asylum to.

September 18, 2004: Police arrested a man driving a car full of explosives in Moscow. The man said he was paid a thousand dollars on a street that Russian president Putin often drove down. The arrested man died of a heart attack shortly after his arrest.

September 17, 2004: Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev admitted he was behind the Beslan school massacre. Basayev said that the operation had only cost him about $9,000 to finance. About 30 of Basayevs followers also died in the operation. Basayevs also admitted that the suicide bombing of two Russian airliners last month had only cost him $4,000, while the suicide bombing outside a Moscow subway station last month had cost him back $7,000 to carry out.

September 15, 2004: As a result of the Beslan murders, police and military operations in Chechnya have increased. This has produced the arrest of some Chechens involved in supporting terrorist operations, and rebel camps as well. Part of this is because of more energetic operations by angry Russians, but also more tips from Chechens appalled at the mass murder of Children in Beslan.

September 14, 2004: Russia and Israel have exchanged intelligence officers, and apparently information on terrorist operations as well.

United States aircraft have been moving 24 pounds of Cold War era weapons grade uranium from Uzbekistan, where Islamic radicals are a growing force, back to Russia. The uranium had been stored at a nuclear research facility. Hundreds of pounds of similar grade uranium are still stored in research facilities and industrial facilities in nations that were once part of the Soviet Union.
__________________
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend
Sinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)