|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
12-05-04, 02:31 PM | #21 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
|
|
12-05-04, 03:02 PM | #22 | |||
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,018
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
- js. |
|||
12-05-04, 05:26 PM | #23 | |
--------------------
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,379
|
Quote:
Link---- was for your claim of 90%........how did the wall street journal come up with this number?
__________________
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend |
|
12-05-04, 06:07 PM | #24 | |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Re: Re: all i can say is..
Quote:
|
|
12-05-04, 09:18 PM | #25 | |||
hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,708
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
i read articles from reuters, AP, CNN, and even the opinion journal of the WSJ and i have seen nothing that support your claim. |
|||
12-05-04, 09:49 PM | #26 | ||||
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Stay tuned. This is the newest trend in reality shows. Small, low-budget, Al-Snuffa productions, built-in viewership, and primetime slots with internet distribution. It's bound to be big. These assholes don't care how many innocent people we may hack through or 'pave over' to get to them, or if we even do get to them. They just want to make sure we stay hungry for them and their ilk. They don't give a fuck about content, they're just in it to sell the advertising time. They believe themselves to be spiritual antibodies with the divine purpose of killing an infection, and if five of them can isolate and eliminate one of us and be destroyed in the process, it's considered a good day. Their genius lies in the fact that they value our deaths above their own lives, and that they breed like no other organism on this earth--by sharing an idea, a virus that can thrive on our fear but virtually teems in our hatred. Thus they're deliriously happy as long as they have our full attention, the full focus of our hatred, and the reins of our priorities. |
||||
12-05-04, 11:02 PM | #27 |
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
Advertizing time? What is it they're selling?
|
13-05-04, 07:29 AM | #28 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Ok... I'm going to open myself up to a bit of criticism here... but what the hell.
I watched the video again last night and remembered a few things that flashed through my mind when I watched it originally... How many times does the guy reading the statement read the same page? He fannys around with the paper as if there's nothing written on it - hardly surprising, because there probably wasn't - the dubbing and editing is fucking amateur and/or intentional. Another thing, I'll check snopes about this, but when the throat/jugular is cut, blood usually spurts out for several seconds - particularly during a stressful occassion when blood pressure is skyrocketing - yet the blood seems to trickle out and pool on the floor - not a drop hits the nearby two walls that corner his body. I reckon (by the grace of God) he was already dead before the decapitation - that'd account for the porno-style zoom in and out, inbetween Berg being pushed to the ground and the knife being used. His struggling movements wouldn't have been difficult to simulate. Then again, maybe I'm too suspicious. Proceed with the namecalling.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
13-05-04, 10:19 AM | #29 | |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
maybe
Quote:
I thought the same thing. FAKE The next question is who faked it them or us?
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
|
13-05-04, 10:34 AM | #30 |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
I got the video from Squid's link...no dubbing and such poor resolution i couldn't really see blood except where it was on Berg's jaw. It would have spurted downward anyway. I saw a lot of page turning and reading. It all looked authentic enough. Where'd you get your version?
Are you thinking of Daniel Pearl where they didn't know how to work the video camera and had to fake-kill him a second time to get the video? |
13-05-04, 01:28 PM | #31 | |
fish tacos ftw
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,809
|
Re: maybe
Quote:
I don't think it's fake. |
|
13-05-04, 02:45 PM | #32 | |
Keebeck Canuck
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Close to a border of LUNATICS
Posts: 1,771
|
Re: Re: maybe
Quote:
Imho, if this were a true video and not manipulated, they must have bled him before the whole horrendous thing was done. |
|
13-05-04, 04:06 PM | #33 |
--------------------
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,379
|
Well it seems to me Liberals want to blame anybody but the Killers.
__________________
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend |
13-05-04, 06:11 PM | #34 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,018
|
rummy's boys think it's the mccoy. maybe they know something...
- js. |
13-05-04, 09:04 PM | #35 | |
fish tacos ftw
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,809
|
Quote:
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=354134 the funny is present. |
|
14-05-04, 12:44 AM | #36 | |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
However, I'm just pointing out that the video is heavily (and poorly) edited. For example, Berg's screaming starts before the knife is pulled - yet he is sat there motionless and his mouth does not open... the video is dubbed - simple as that. Christ, I could have done better than that! Albed - to answer your question, I used squid's link. I also downloaded it twice, just incase I had a corupted copy, but the dubbing's just as bad. Check it out again. Before anyone lays into me over this, be aware that I ain't blaming it on anyone - I'm simply pointing out a few flaws. Check out the time codes on the picture... I'm hardly a military analyst but the order of the timecodes pretty much shows that the video hasn't just been edited, it's been re-arranged. Look, these are presented in the order that they are shown in the video... Picture 1
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
|
14-05-04, 12:45 AM | #37 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Picture 2
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
14-05-04, 12:45 AM | #38 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Picture 3
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
14-05-04, 12:46 AM | #39 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Picture 4
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
14-05-04, 12:46 AM | #40 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Picture 5
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|