Go Back   P2P-Zone > Napsterites News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Napsterites News News/Events Archives.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-09-07, 03:24 AM   #1
Thanks for being with arse
multi's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default Victorious RIAA defendant gets attorneys' fees, turns to class-action plans


Calling the RIAA's case unjustified "as a reasonable exploration of the boundaries of copyright law," a federal magistrate judge late last week awarded former RIAA defendant Tanya Andersen attorneys' fees for her nearly two-and-a-half-year fight against a copyright infringement lawsuit.

Andersen is a disabled single mother living in Oregon with her now 10-year-old daughter. In February 2005, she was sued by the record labels, which accused her of using KaZaA to distribute gangster rap under the handle "gotenkito." From the outset, she denied all wrongdoing, and in October of that year, filed a countersuit against the record industry, accusing it of racketeering, fraud, and deceptive business practices.

The RIAA continued to press its legal claims against Andersen, despite any evidence other than an IP address tying her to the alleged infringement. Andersen even provided the name, address, and phone number of the person she believed was responsible for the "gotenkito" account. Inexplicably, the RIAA chose not to contact him for over two years, then chose to take his denial at face value, choosing instead to continue prosecuting the case against Andersen.

Throughout its prosecution of the case, Andersen accused the RIAA of underhanded investigative tactics. These included what Andersen describes as inappropriate attempts to contact her daughter. In one instance, the RIAA's investigators allegedly contacted her elementary school, posing as a relative in an attempt to speak with then-eight-year-old Kylee Andersen about the alleged infringement. Even the RIAA's own forensic investigator reported that he could not find "any evidence whatsoever" that Andersen had used KaZaA.

In June of this year, the RIAA finally came to the conclusion that it had an unwinnable case and decided to drop the case prior to its going to trial. The parties stipulated to a dismissal with prejudice—unusual for the RIAA, since it made Andersen the prevailing party and eligible for attorneys' fees. Andersen dismissed her counterclaims without prejudice (meaning she can refile them) after she filed a malicious prosecution lawsuit against the RIAA.

In his order awarding Andersen attorneys' fees, US Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas noted that he had to make a decision on this case "without ever addressing the merits of the claims or the counterclaims." Despite that, Judge Ashmanskas noted that there had been a "material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties," and that with the sole exception of attorneys' fees, Andersen had gotten "all the relief available to a defendant of a claim for copyright infringement."


i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-09-07, 11:12 PM   #2
Just Draggin' Along
Drakonix's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,210


It's good to see the dirty tactics the RIAA has used are finally catching up to it.

The judge also said "that the RIAA lacked the prima facie evidence to support the claims of infringement", which means the RIAA knowingly wrongfully prosecuted innocent people.

Now it's the RIAA's turn to be the defendant in a lawsuit. I think the class action will probably win.
Copyright means the copy of the CD/DVD burned with no errors.

I will never spend a another dime on content that I canít use the way I please. If I canít copy it to my hard drive and play it using the devices I want, when and where I want, I wonít be buying it. Period. They can all take their DRM, broadcast flags, rootkits, and Compact Discs that arenít really compact discs and shove them up their bottom-lines.
Drakonix is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - September 15th, '07 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 1 12-09-07 09:49 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - July 21st, '07 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 1 18-07-07 10:18 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - June 9th, '07 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 1 06-06-07 07:39 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - March 31st, '07 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 1 28-03-07 08:51 AM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - August 9th, '03 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 2 09-08-03 11:30 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2023