|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
29-01-05, 09:53 AM | #21 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
yeh..yeh..whatever you say
ofcourse you are the fucking expert on evrything... |
29-01-05, 10:54 AM | #22 |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Some people are just too lazy or burned out to bother learning new stuff. Give him a website that tells him what to think without the effort of learning anything new or thinking too hard.
|
29-01-05, 11:17 AM | #23 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
can you look anymore the pretentious twat that you are...is it possible?
|
29-01-05, 12:28 PM | #24 | |
Keebeck Canuck
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Close to a border of LUNATICS
Posts: 1,771
|
Jcat
Just finished reading your link. That person make a very good point using material/factual evidences but in the end, he totally blows it by his conclusion on the subject. Thought the webpage had way too many ads flashing... This person must be desperate to keep this page up at minimal cost Anyway, this is it's conclusion Quote:
Got me curious, so I googled up ""montgomery collapse rescue team. The search result is what surprised me the most. The first to hits are worth the look. |
|
29-01-05, 12:49 PM | #25 | |
Mooo?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
haha jsut clicked on ya google link and fema is on the top line of the first hit, says enough |
|
29-01-05, 12:52 PM | #26 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
This is what people mean when they tell you you have your head up your ass. |
|
29-01-05, 02:09 PM | #27 |
hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,708
|
i'm bemused reading all the crap of those who question the fact that a 757 did crash into the pentagon and that all these websites who are claiming otherwise are merely stating a different "opinion". there is no opinion! it's quite obvious that not much will be left when a plane the size of a 757 fully fueled hits a solid structure at over 500 mph.
you can clearly see the hole it left, the huge fires afterwards prove that a large amount of aviation fuel was on board, you can clearly see the charred parts of the landing gear, the APU, and fan blades, and, for all those who believe that a missile crashed into the pentagon and not a plane, clearly marked pieces of fuselage with the rivet markings and greenish primer and the logo of american airlines. did i forget to mention that barbara olsen, the conservative journalist who made regular appearances on CNN and fox news and is probably best known for her unrelenting criticism of the clinton administration, was on this flight? she called her husband, solicitor general ted olsen, just before the plane crashed and told him that the flight has been hijacked and they're over washington DC.
__________________
high quality tunes |
29-01-05, 03:23 PM | #28 | |
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
I'm laughing even harder that someone who can make such pointless little circles (as albed did in his last 'response' to me) wants anyone to believe they have 'the big picture'--that someone can "evaluate large amounts of information and come to rational conclusions" when they apparently can't even get the gist of a couple of simple paragraphs.
As to inconclusiveness being a crucial aspect of certain questions, It's downright scary that you couldn't figure this out on your own and you have to ask for examples. Did you really think you had me there? Well that's even scarier, I can think of about 1000 examples without even really trying, but you really must believe you have all the answers. Did OJ do it? When will you die? Is there life after death? What will you be doing at 6:15 PM on July 14th, 2018? What will happen if you gamble your paycheck on the lottery? What happened to the dinosaurs? Is there life on other planets? What will be the total cost of the war in Iraq? How many innocent people are in prison? When will it rain next? When will the sun burn out? Oscillating Big Bang or steady state? Particle or Wave? Choice or Genetic? Global warming or no problem? Does Michael Jackson have sex with little boys? Did Janet Jackson mean to flash her tit? If a tree falls in the forest and there's no one around to hear it, does it make a sound? Does the human body actually lose 21 grams at the moment of death, and why? What was the hump under the president's jacket? Who is right about Jesus, the Christians or the Jews? Why do we dream? What happened to the Anasazi? What happened to the weapons of mass destruction? Will Iraq be a successful democracy? Is it possible to build a perpetual motion machine? What did William Shakespeare eat for breakfast on his 11th birthday? Will artificial intelligence ever exceed human intelligence? How would gay people getting married affect straight people getting married? Is the speed of light an inflexible constant? How many more Americans will die in Iraq? Who will be the first human to step foot on Mars? When and where will the next earthquake be? Are all crop circles hoaxes? Will a democratic Iraq prevent future 911s? Is telepathy possible? How would the last election have turned out if everyone who didn't vote voted? Who was Jack the Ripper? Where is Bid Laden? If you flip a coin 100 times, how many times will it land on heads and how many on tails? How many fingers am I holding up right now? To anyone who claims to be as smart as you it should be plain as day that in most of the above examples if you believe you have conclusive answers it is precisely that, a belief. You don't know the answers and you may never know the answers, but you may prefer to believe one thing over another. It also seems ridiculous to have to point out that affirming the inconclusiveness of most of these problems is the most important aspect. The concept of manmade global warming has been around for about 30 years, but it's still inconclusive. Those who affirm its inconclusiveness are still doing the work of trying to determine if it's a viable concept, while those who believe one or another conclusion simply pointlessly argue with each other about their beliefs. How much would you bet with someone that you could flip a coin and have it land on heads 100 times in a row? Hopefully not much--but I can't be sure. I haven't drawn any conclusions about exactly how stupid you may be. Quote:
In a previous post you claimed "in keeping with your self-image as nonconformist rebels you start parroting whatever is contrary to mainstream convention thereby proclaiming: 'look how special and different I am'." What is this "mainstream convention" of which you speak? It's nothing like an "official view" is it? And by the way, since you're attacking people's spelling, you might want to run a spell check on your own posts, you seem to have no idea how to spell inconsistencies or prerogative. |
|
29-01-05, 04:26 PM | #29 | |
Keebeck Canuck
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Close to a border of LUNATICS
Posts: 1,771
|
Quote:
Multi, remember that PM i sent you about the rommie, apply it to albed. Same type of behaviour. schmooky007, personnally, i'm also bemused that people don't realise how some precision flying it was. What I mean is that these planes flew at 500 mph ffs. Even the instructor told the press that those 'terrorists' couldn't even fly a cesna, imagine them now, flying jumbo airplanes at the speed of 500 mph and hitting their target, all 3 of them. It just doesn't sound right. BTW, i'd also like one of those indestructible passport, the type that can resists high temp fire and can survive after a building crashes on it. |
|
29-01-05, 04:43 PM | #30 | ||
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
I'd teach you how to learn new words but it'd be difficult with your monkey see-monkey do technique of learning. It involves googling and clicking the definition link on the upper right. Mainstream: The prevailing current of thought, influence, or activity Convention: General agreement on or acceptance of certain practices or attitudes Sworn testimony http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...1/pdf/appc.pdf 160 witnesses testified under oath before the 9/11 commission. Quote:
|
||
29-01-05, 04:53 PM | #31 | |||
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by albed : 29-01-05 at 05:17 PM. |
|||
29-01-05, 05:38 PM | #32 | ||||
Keebeck Canuck
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Close to a border of LUNATICS
Posts: 1,771
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And now, to analyse your behaviour in depth, there is only one word I can come up with. Troll . Quote:
|
||||
29-01-05, 05:48 PM | #33 | ||
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
Quote:
Quote:
The monkey-see-monkey-do thing really hurts coming from someone who thinks their ability to look up isolated word definitions on google is a substitute for comprehension. I'm sure you consider yourself a master debater because you're slick enough to use a dictionary, but most of us can see you're merely jerking off again. Believe what you want to believe, the only influence whatever crap you believe has on me is that engenders a suspicion that most people who choose not to question 'mainstream conventions' are just as terminally ignorant as you are, but that's inconclusive. |
||
29-01-05, 05:51 PM | #34 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
|
|
29-01-05, 05:55 PM | #35 |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Here monkey monkey.
Question: An expression of inquiry that invites or calls for a reply. Information: A collection of facts or data No new tricks for the old dog eh? |
29-01-05, 05:59 PM | #36 |
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
If you're trying to prove that you're retarded you can rest easy. You proved that a long time ago. If I ever doubt it I can just look at the picture you posted but were too chickenshit to leave up. I saved it to remind myself that sometimes people can actually look as stupid as they sound.
|
29-01-05, 06:10 PM | #37 | |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
a kazillion typos
Quote:
Playing microsoft flight sim. for years. 1) Sure it is easy when one knows he isn't going to die 2) sure it is easy without the crosswinds 3) sure it is easy when both engines are Mathematically identical 4) sure it is easy when the ground effect an 757 generates is cancelled out. dragging a computer game in to real life is not going to fly (sneaky pun there) the twin towers sure auto pilot will do it for you..... that close to the ground (pentagon) i don't think so. For my two cents, too many unanswered questions to make the states view believable. But to believe that it is a huge conspiracy is also ....uhm .... a bit out of this world. i just fail to see what "they" had to gain from it Last edited by toy boy : 29-01-05 at 06:20 PM. |
|
29-01-05, 07:00 PM | #38 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
And thanks for not posting yours. Calling me retarded or the old "baffle 'em with bullshit" routine won't change the meaning of "information" or "question". You should have learned long ago that your thinking doesn't mesh with reality and given up on trying to convince rational people that you're in the right. |
|
29-01-05, 07:05 PM | #39 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
|
|
29-01-05, 09:26 PM | #40 | |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
Unfortunatly ground effect and crosswind can't be switched off in R.L. i never said a word about engine-out. the altitude the hijacker(s) flew is next to impossible considering the airspeed. the conspiracy theorists have one point, at that altitude and with that airspeed the cars on the freeway should have experienced jet wash |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|