|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
06-10-04, 05:52 AM | #21 |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
I pulled an all nighter today just to see the debate between Edwards and Cheney and I tried to make sense of it.
A bit of an illusion on my part I know but I gave it a shot anyways. I have heard Cheney say that Kerry voted against this and that, he voted against something else but most of all he voted against. And that is about all he had to throw at Edwards. Now I am Dutch but that wouldn’t cut it over here. I think that most of you people like to know, just like I do, how they are going to solve the problems in Iraq, the economy, the loss of jobs and so on. Neither party had any examples on how to finance their plans and I seriously doubt that money magically appears in the U.S. (if it does let me know) I heard Cheney say that Kerry’s administration will interfere more into the people lives (government control) Okay I might be a bit Dutch here again but isn’t that having a very big mouth? I mean this administration came up with the patriot act, right??? I have never, in my entire life, seen such a huge violation/infringement of your civil rights. I have read one of our fellow Napsterite had to pay $600+ a month for medical insurance and I am sure many others will have to cough up that kind of dough with him/her/them Now I am going to use a dirty word for ya yanks but wouldn’t it be better if you peeps start to pay attention to countries where medical insurance fees are paid COLLECTIVELY ????? I pay for a basic (no dentist, no alternative healthcare/treatment) roughly $60 a month and if I do want the whole deal I will pay about $84 (I don’t wanna be caught on a lie, so it is only fair to say that it is on the rise here too and this amounts comes on top of what my employer has to pay) I have been told that without a job you peeps are not insured for medical treatment at all. Is this true ??? Sounds a bit dangerous to me! We are all medically insured here, the working, the unemployed even illegal aliens won’t be without medical treatment. Don’t get me wrong here I am not saying that this country and that our system is so much better, far from it. However I like the idea that someone from a country where TB reigns supreme and when he/she makes it into this country he/she will get treated before he/she infects more and more people. Another thing I noticed was that they went on and on about Iraq, very important, I know, however the subjects like the national deposit or the huge number of people that lost their job was dealt with in about 5 to 10 minutes. Both came with plans to cut the deposit in halve but again with hardly any backing on how to. Like I said before I am not claiming our system is better, far from it!! And I am not taking a piss at the political system in the U.S. just trying to make heads and tails of it.
__________________
Some people exist just to annoy me |
06-10-04, 06:10 AM | #22 | |
yea, it's me.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 2,093
|
Quote:
my (and family's) best hope of getting any sort of insurance is to sign up for medicaid (sorta welfare) but guess bloody what?! We own too much to qualify for any assistance. we'd have to live in a tent and ride a horse to work:S there's nothing for the working poor or lower middle income folks....damn sorry for what's supposed to be one of the "richest" countries in the world, eh. and yea, it's fucked up. totally. |
|
06-10-04, 06:36 AM | #23 | ||
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Quote:
Dangerously close to the 'S-word', legion. Careful mate, you'll be castrated with your hammer and sickle if you say it out loud.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
||
06-10-04, 07:52 AM | #24 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
i buy health insurance for myself, and just myself...no children or other dependents. it's a great plan albeit one with a fairly high deductible; but once that's met there are no co-pays or other nickel and dime things that bleed you to death. it does not however cover eyeglasses or dentists. it will cover transplants, long term care, hospitalization etc up to $5 million total. it costs me around $250.00 a month. it has more than paid for itself. having said that i realize even 250 can be out of reach of many individuals, and those with dependents would have to pay more, while those with "pre-existing conditions" would have to pay much, much more - if they could even find an underwriter willing to cover them to begin with. i sometimes think health insurance is the worst thing that's happened to the west, that in fact it should be banned. i happen to think you can't actually have an economy in which people can't buy what you're selling. as it applies to health care, if people - all people - had to pay out of their pockets the true cost of care as it stands now they wouldn't be able to - so to my way of thinking the market would have to adjust to reality and configure itself so it was supportable by it's customers, in this case the patients. in short order we'd go from most people not being able to afford it to the opposite: most people enjoying and affording good health care with lots of marketplace choices. there will always be the poor among us, those that really can't afford anything at all, and it will always be a problem accommodating them in any area, whether it's food, housing or health care, but to have a marketplace that essentially no one can participate in is the definition of dysfunctional, and unless that basic dichotomy is addressed all the health insurance schemes in the country, whether republican (brutally stingy) or democratic (optimistically overreaching) will not fix this increasingly dangerous problem.
- js. |
06-10-04, 08:32 AM | #25 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
SOCIALIZED MEDICAL CARE!!! Are you insane? You seem to be confused about the word "paid" --and "deposit"(national debt)-- But socialism "takes". It isn't hard to figure that the people who take care of their health will be punished and the people who ruin their health will be rewarded. The U.S. has all sorts of voluntary insurance programs for people to protect themselves from large unforseen medical expenses but the term insurance has been hijacked to mean subsidy and since someone has to pay the subsidy the premiums have gotten exorbantly large and it really ends up shifting the cost from the recipient to the premium payer(usually employers and government) until the payers rebel, the providers get shortchanged and start gouging and things degenerate into a mess. I could really get into the economics and fairness but it simply boils down to the old maxim: if you want more of something subsidize it and if you want less of it tax it. If you want more sick people, even people pretending to be sick and scamming the system and hypochondriacs wasting money and resources, subsidize them. |
|
06-10-04, 08:54 AM | #26 | |
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
The VP debate was pretty much the same format as the Bush/Kerry debate, meaning they really didn't debate anything, they just produced sound bytes for an hour and a half. The presidential candidates sent out their attack dogs to say the things they couldn't afford to say themselves. It wasn't as entertaining as last week's debate.
Quote:
It took a cold war to get us to the moon; it would take a similar push from the government to cure cancer and AIDS. They should be pushing for more research and be less liberal with awarding patents, this would drive down the cost of perscription drugs and other medical supplies. The government should help more medical students get through school, not just cheaply but also well educated in the end, and this would lead to lower litigation insurance rates and reduce doctor's fees overall. When the building is crumbling you don't waste resources making superficial repairs, the first thing you look at is the foundation and reinforce it, and that's research and education as far as heath care is concerned. That will at least prevent things from getting worse, and reforms thence forth will have a lasting effect. |
|
06-10-04, 10:02 AM | #27 | ||
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Quote:
this just in.. Quote:
|
||
06-10-04, 10:32 AM | #28 | |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
I spent more than one night in a Marriott hotel, valet parking, nice room, great view, good service, a swell mini bar, access to a gym and sauna, and a very nice breakfast (although vegemite isn’t my thing) but it didn’t cost me $300 a night. Damn close to it but still. I also heard those two bitch about the lawsuits and the millions that are awarded for a medical mishap. Since my view on American society is distorted at best thanks to the media. I wander is this true or does overhead costs amount to the bulk of the money spent on health care on your side of the pond? Here (the Netherlands) a member of the board of virtually any hospital takes home more money than our prime minister while they cannot afford to hire another nurse for those who really needs it. Therefore the level of care one receives here is in my opinion below average. I do believe I read somewhere that you do have kid(s)( if I am wrong please do feel free to kick my ass about it.) May god forbid it will ever happen but what if one of them falls seriously ill? I take it you would have to cough up the money yourself, something that seems impossible to me. Also what happens when you run out of money? Would your kid(s) be kicked out of the hospital with all the horrible consequences that might have? And a limit of 5 million dollars on your insurance??? is this the amount you can spend in your live time? @ tambourine-man, SOCIALIST there I said it. Am I a brave little fucker or what?
__________________
Some people exist just to annoy me |
|
07-10-04, 12:53 AM | #29 | |||||
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
However, you seem to be labouring under a delusion regarding the social ettiquette or intelligence of illness. You seem to believe that your health is largely in your hands - which it is, and that all other factors are perhaps negligable - which they're not. I'll tell you a little story. My beloved girlfriend is a pharmacist. In the course of her dispensary duty, she'll hand out quite a few medicinal prescriptions for cancer and, amazingly, quite a few of those who have cancer, have it through no fault of their own. Get this, some people who have lung/throat cancer have never smoked a cig in their life, some people who have skin cancer aren't sun worshippers nor have they spent half their life under a UV lamp. Some people whose liver has packed up haven't lived life with a bottle of scotch in their hand. Some people who have blood diseases didn't contract them through their own actions - they didn't 'ruin their own health'. If the equation were as simple as: OWN ACTION = STANDARD OF HEALTH ... then I'd agree with you. I'd be right alongside you demanding that people pay their own way - after all, if I can stay healthy, then why can't others? And if others can't stay healthy, then why should I pay for them? Unfortunately, as I suspect you're aware of, life often throws many of us a 'curl ball'... (are you impressed with my mastery of American colloquialism?)... which you comment on below... Quote:
Quote:
If subsidisation actually leads to an increase in reported illness - what does that tell you? Putting aside the scammers for a minute, is it logical to assume that increased subsidizing actually encourages the growth of micro-organisms and causes the spread of cancer? No. However, it is perhaps logical to assume that when people can afford coverage, they'll use it. In other words, there is an underlying 'unmet need' within the healthcare system. When people have no coverage - they suffer in silence. When there is cover, they claim. It is, believe it or not, a quality of life issue - and that is the basic principle of a socialised system of healthcare, the basic philosophical difference between an insurance and socialised system. That the shared economic burdon is worth it because:
Jesus... imagine that. "Sorry, you were born with AIDS. Looks like you're shit out of luck".
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 Last edited by tambourine-man : 07-10-04 at 04:42 AM. |
|||||
07-10-04, 12:53 AM | #30 | |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
|
07-10-04, 02:23 AM | #31 | |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
?
Quote:
http://www.iespell.com/ Sorry to be picky,but it lowers the tone of the neighbourhood.
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
|
07-10-04, 02:54 AM | #32 | |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Yeah. that's what I meant.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
|
07-10-04, 04:34 AM | #33 | |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
__________________
Some people exist just to annoy me |
|
07-10-04, 07:53 AM | #34 | |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
Is it finished yet.
Quote:
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
|
07-10-04, 08:33 AM | #35 |
even the losers
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,090
|
i'm admiring the shape of that sharp sickle, especially the curled outer edge.
|
07-10-04, 11:14 AM | #36 | ||||
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
Quote:
Almost everyone's health is in their own hands. I've seen studies indicating that 80% of US healthcare costs are a result of lifestyle choices. Give a drug addict top notch treatment for his overdose and he'll survive to need a second round later. A fat guy I worked with once commented his doctor would kill him if he saw the sausage and bacon he was eating after two bypass operations. People should face the consequences of their own choices or they'll have no reason to make better ones, and I shouldn't be billed for their choices. Quote:
Quote:
You get into some silly reasoning and twisted definitions: 'unmet need' I guess means 'sick people' but you don't seem able to convey your opinion in clear realistic terms which I often notice in people who don't understand and just 'feel' a certain way. |
||||
07-10-04, 09:32 PM | #37 | |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
Quote:
that 5 mil then is for me alone and yeah, when it runs out i'll have to start selling assets. on the other hand something so catastrophically costly probably has such an infinitesimally low survival rate to begin with that figuring out the money angles will be the least of my worries. as for reaching 5 mil just in normal wear and tear well, i spend a few grand a year, on a bad year, for care, so it would take a very long time at that rate. in any event i usually pick up a new plan every 5 or ten tears anyway, and the money clock reverts to zero each time. - js. |
|
08-10-04, 12:24 AM | #38 | |||||||||
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You make valid points regarding the stupidity and irresponsible attitude of people and it's net effect on your premium. But as I stated earlier, you are choosing to ignore the factors that are out of your control... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thankyou for your thoughts, albed. ------------------------------------------- PS: malva - cheers for the iespell link! -------------------------------------------
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
|||||||||
08-10-04, 01:24 AM | #39 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
|
|
08-10-04, 01:54 AM | #40 | ||||
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Quote:
I just don't mind looking out for others who aren't as lucky as me. No great conspiracy. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|