|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
View Poll Results: What next? | |||
KILL THEM ALL ! | 0 | 0% | |
STOP ! | 3 | 100.00% | |
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
11-01-09, 05:54 AM | #1 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
In defense of Israel's 'disproportionate' response in Gaza
Kannamachi, Japan – It seems that whenever Israel responds to violent overtures from groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, leaders of the international community are quick to assign equal condemnation to Israelis and Palestinians regardless of whether one is legitimately acting in self-defense.
Whether it is due to a latent anti-Semitism, the desire to avoid inflaming fundamentalist Arab passions, or simply an unrealistic belief in equality, world leaders are focusing too much on buzzwords. In the case of Israel, the buzzwords are the "disproportionate" and "excessive" use of force – terms used in the 2006 Lebanon war and most recently spoken by French President Nikolas Sarkozy and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in response to Israel's Gaza offensive. This is a particularly puzzling criticism of Israel. Would the international community truly prefer a proportionate or equal response? If Hamas launches three crudely-fashioned rockets into Israel, should the Israeli government respond with three equally-crude rockets? If three Israeli Defense Forces are kidnapped by Hezbollah, should the IDF respond by kidnapping an equal number of Hezbollah foot-soldiers? The notion of "proportional" response lacks both merit and logical support for several reasons. In war, there are winners and losers, and the only palatable means of victory come from a disproportionate use of force. Victors are inherently more skilled in combat, tactics, and in the effective deployment of (generally superior) technology. It does not make sense to demand one technologically or militarily superior belligerent to refrain from fighting to their full potential, simply because they are able to enact "disproportionate" damage on a weaker foe. Should the United States have refrained from using the atomic bomb because Japan did not yet possess one? Would it have been better to extend Lend-Lease to Nazi Germany as well as Britain so that neither side would gain the advantage? Simply put, a militarily superior force should not limit itself due to the international community's desire to root for the underdog. The notion of "proportional" responses is further baffling in that such occurrences actually prolong conflicts. One need only look to the warfare in World War I. Equally-manned belligerents, using the same tactics, the same weapons, and the same defenses resulted in both sides being bogged down in interminable trench-warfare. No side could gain the upper hand and thus the conflict continued in an endless back-and-forth. The cold war is another example of a proportional conflict. Both Russia and the United States maintained near-parity in regard to weapons, manpower, and political influence, and neither could emerge as sole superpower. As a result of its drawn-out nature, the conflict spread beyond America and Russia to encompass the entire Eastern and Western worlds. For an international community so concerned with peace, condemning "disproportionate" response, thereby accepting endless symmetrical warfare, appears hypocritical. To be sure, discretion is the better part of valor, and that makes genocide a line that is unacceptable to cross. The use of retaliatory military force must not be reflexive. If peaceful solutions fail, however, the use of force is a viable option that may have to be employed. Certainly, an indiscriminate carpet-bombing or use of nuclear weapons on Gaza would be an unacceptable and excessive use of force, but if care is taken to minimize the loss of civilian life, then states should be able to respond as they see fit. In the 2006 Lebanon war, as well as the current Gaza offensive, this proportionality argument has no place. In neither case did Israel decide to launch unprovoked, unnecessary air and ground assaults on a whim as a way of boasting its military might. In both cases, Israel's actions came as a response to provocations from groups bent on its destruction. Hamas should garner no international sympathy simply because it made the poor decision of engaging an enemy of far-superior military might. The international community must further realize that both belligerents do not always need equal blame placed upon them. Israel's superior military power comes with responsibility, however. In the wake of the Gaza offensive, Israel should be active in supplying humanitarian aid to affected civilians, and to help moderates such as Mahmoud Abbas regain influence in the area. Hamas is owed nothing, of course. But in order to further peace negotiations, civilians and moderates must be given any support necessary from Israel. With the latest Gaza offensive, world leaders must condemn Hamas for abandoning its truce with Israel and recklessly endangering Palestinian citizens, while supporting Israel's right to defend itself, not offering platitudes condemning a "disproportionate" or "excessive" use of force. LINK |
11-01-09, 08:24 AM | #2 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
Quote:
|
|
11-01-09, 09:53 AM | #3 | ||
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Quote:
(and use a revolt for help and then change the deal) 1914 Mesopotamian Campaign: The campaign was fought mainly in the Tigris River valley region of what is now Iraq, and included battles on the Persian Gulf coast, at Basra, and numerous struggles around Kut and Baghdad. Caucasus Campaign: The Russian and Ottoman armies fought in the Caucasus and eastern Anatolia (northeastern Turkey), with the Ottoman Empire suffering a crushing defeat at the Battle of Sarikamis in November-December. 1915 Mesopotamian Campaign: Initially the Ottomans successfully repelled the British incursions. However, fortunes reversed after the disastrous Siege of Kut. Caucasus Campaign: The Russians went on the offensive, advancing as far as Lake Van, but the Ottoman forces were ultimately able to drive them back. Ottoman repression of the Armenian population in Anatolia, who had evinced pro-Russian sentiments, grew into what is now called the Armenian Genocide. The fighting was largely inconclusive as the focus of the Ottoman and Russian war effort shifted to the Dardanelles Campaign and the Eastern Front respectively. Dardanelles Campaign: the campaign, which began on April 25, took place at on the Gallipoli Peninsula on the European side of the Dardanelles (tr:Çanakkale Savaşları), and is commonly referred to in Australia, New Zealand and Newfoundland simply as "Gallipoli". The British and French mounted a combined operation with the goal of capturing the Ottoman capital at Constantinople (now Istanbul). The campaign started with a Naval attempt to force the Dardanelles. When this failed the Allies decided to seize the European side of the Dardanelles with an amphibious assault. The troops were able to land but could not dislodge the Ottoman forces after months of battle that caused the deaths of an estimated 131,000 soldiers, and 262,000 wounded. Eventually the Allied forces withdrew. The campaigning represented something of a coming of age for Australia and New Zealand who celebrate April 25th as ANZAC Day. Kemal Ataturk, who would go on to become the first leader of modern Turkey distinguished himself as a Lieut. Colonel in the Ottoman forces there. Arab Revolt: The British, based in Egypt, began to incite the Arabs living in Hejaz near the Red Sea and inland to revolt to expel the Ottoman forces from what is the modern-day Saudi Arabian peninsula. Sinai and Palestine Campaign: The Ottomans launched an unsuccessful attack across the Sinai with the objective of destroying or capturing the Suez Canal. 1916 Arab Revolt: In 1916, a combination of diplomacy and genuine dislike of the new leaders of the Ottoman Empire (the Three Pashas) convinced Sherif Hussein ibn Ali of Mecca to begin a revolt. He gave the leadership of this revolt to two of his sons: Faisal and Abdullah, though the planning and direction for the war was largely the work of Lawrence of Arabia. Caucasus Campaign: The Russian offensive in northeastern Turkey culminated with the capture of Erzurum in February and Trabzon in April. Sinai and Palestine Campaign: The Ottoman forces launched a second attack across the Sinai with the objective of destroying or capturing the Suez Canal. Both this and the earlier attack (1915) were unsuccessful, though not very costly by the standards of the Great War. The British then went on the offensive, attacking east into Palestine. However, two failed attempts to capture the Ottoman fort of Gaza resulted in sweeping changes to the British command and the arrival of General Allenby, along with many reinforcements. 1917 Turkish trenches at the shores of the Dead Sea, 1917. Mesopotamian Campaign: British Empire forces reorganized and captured Baghdad in March 1917. Caucasus Campaign: Russia effectively withdrew from the war in 1917; the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk of 1918 eventually restored to Ottoman Empire the territories it had lost to Russia during the war. Arab Revolt: The revolt was a success, aided immensely by General Allenby's conquest of Palestine in 1917 (see the Sinai and Palestine Campaign for details). British artillery placements during the Battle of Jerusalem, 1917. Sinai and Palestine Campaign: Late in 1917, Allenby's Egyptian Expeditionary Force smashed the Ottoman defenses and captured Gaza, and then captured Jerusalem just before Christmas. While strategically of minimal importance to the war, this event was key in the subsequent creation of Israel as a separate nation in 1948. Quote:
1918 Sinai and Palestine Campaign: Ottoman Empire could be defeated with campaigns in Palestine and Mesopotamia and the Spring Offensive delayed the expected attack. General Allenby's was given brand new divisions recruited from India. British achieved complete control of the air General Liman von Sanders, had no clear idea where the British were going to attack. Compounding the problems, withdrew their best troops to Caucasus Campaign. General Allenby finally launched Battle of Megiddo,with the Jewish Legion under his command, Ottoman troops started a full scale retreat. Arab Revolt: T. E. Lawrence and his Arab fighters staged many hit-and-run attacks on supply lines and tied down thousands of soldiers in garrisons throughout Palestine, Jordan, and Syria. Caucasus Campaign: The Grand vizier Talat Pasha signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk March 3 1918 with the Russian SFSR which stipulated that Bolshevik Russia cede Batum, Kars, and Ardahan to Ottoman Empire. Treaty of Brest-Litovsk united the Armenian-Georgian block[4]. Democratic Republic of Armenia declared the existence of a state of war between the Ottoman Empire[4]. In early May, 1918, the Ottoman army faced the Armenian Corps of Armenian National Councils which soon declared the Democratic Republic of Armenia. The Ottoman army captured Trabzon, Erzurum, Kars, Van, and Batumi. The conflict led to the Battle of Sardarapat, the Battle of Kara Killisse (1918), and the Battle of Bash Abaran. Although the Armenians managed to inflict a defeat on the Ottomans at the Battle of Sardarapat, the Ottoman army won the later battle and scattered the Armenian army. The fight with Democratic Republic of Armenia ended with the sign the Treaty of Batum in June, 1918. However throughout the summer of 1918, under the leadership of Andranik Toros Ozanian Armenians in the mountainous Karabag region resisted the Ottoman 3th army and established the Republic of Mountainous Armenia. The Army of Islam avoided Georgia and marched to the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. They got as far as Baku on the Caspian Sea. They threw the British out in September 1918 with the Battle of Baku. The Armistice, October 30, 1918 The Armistice of Mudros, signed on aboard HMS Agamemnon in Mudros port on the island of Lemnos on October 30 1918, with the Ottoman Empire and Triple Entente. Ottoman activities at all the active campaigns terminated. ...more |
||
17-01-09, 03:51 PM | #4 |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
here's a rather startling stat: Israel killed 1200 Palestinians in the latest round of conflict. of those killed, 410 were children.
hard to see how that is defensible. http://www.reuters.com/article/lates...s/idUSLH286481 |
21-01-09, 09:30 AM | #5 | |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
All we will ever be told is that it's justifiable to kill innocent civilians like that because it is Israel defending itself. That is all we need to know.
Then we put faith in the UN to deal with it fairly and it has always been unable to. Nothing will ever change with that , it is set in stone... Quote:
|
|
21-01-09, 04:43 PM | #6 |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
Israel had 13 people killed, 3 of them civilians, in this latest round. so, 13 dead Israelis = 1300 dead Palestinians.
|
21-01-09, 10:14 PM | #7 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
I guess it's like this... say I am Hamas and you are Israel.
I keep flicking toothpicks at your face in the bar... you yell STOP but I laugh and keep flicking the toothpicks at your face. The bar security do nothing... So you get up and close both my eyes ( No one in the bar pulls you off because you are 16stone and solidly built..a few onlookers shout out hey... hey.. but no one does anything to stop you) I just laugh and keep flicking toothpicks at your face .. hard , then harder...occasionally getting one in your eye. Do you beat me unconscious or leave? Leave and run the risk of having to fight several big hairy bikers on the way out for being such a wimp.. not a great analogy... but you get my drift? |
23-01-09, 05:21 AM | #8 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Obama urges Israel to open Gaza borders
President Barack Obama urged Israel on Thursday to open its borders with Gaza. The plea came in a speech that signalled the new US administration’s shift from Bush-era policy on the Middle East and the world as a whole. In a high-profile address on his second day in office, just hours after he signed an executive order to close the centre at Guantánamo Bay, Mr Obama proclaimed that the US would “actively and aggressively seek a lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians” in the wake of this month’s Gaza war. |
25-01-09, 05:36 AM | #9 | |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
This sounds more like how the situation unfolded..
Quote:
|
|
27-01-09, 07:21 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
In defense of who?
U got to be kidding.
Too upset to read the whole thread. There is no defense for Israel's killing that I can see
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
05-02-09, 10:06 PM | #11 |
Spagal
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,662
|
i think multi has it with the toothpicks analogy...
also the knife it is quite terrifying living under rocket fire. especially in the southern cities of sderot where such rocket fire has been going on daily for almost 10 years with minimal response from israel. victims arent just measured in deaths, but there are victims of terror who cannot leave their homes for fear of an alarm signaling rocket fire (mind you i came very close to being in one of these areas on my recent trip to israel, missed it by not much at all). Israel has shown so much restraint, but it got to a point where its just not bearable. Citizens living in the borders of their homeland have the right to feel safe within those borders. As to children being killed, didnt you hear hamas admitted they use children as human shields? its well known...
__________________
|
12-02-09, 08:01 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
shani,
I hope your kids are able to grow up in a safe place. I guess it would be wise not to live in Gaza. You should go there and volunteer to save the babies. Anything less and you've proven yourself to be another rude Israelite `killkillkill'
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
12-02-09, 10:32 PM | #13 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Yeah Shani stay here in Melbourne where it is ,um.. much safer
You could try California ... PS. what is Spagal? |
13-02-09, 01:05 AM | #14 |
Spagal
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,662
|
I guess its safer...but look at whats been going on lately.. hundreds killed in bushfires...women murdering their husbands, babies being thrown off bridges..it makes you wonder whether its safe anywhere these days. oh yeh just heard about the plane crash in the US.
hey nicobie, do you wanna come with me to save palestinians? might have to survive a few attacks by armed militants first.
__________________
|
13-02-09, 02:46 AM | #15 | |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
---------------- Now playing: Morrissey - Black Cloud via FoxyTunes
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
|
16-02-09, 07:12 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
Darn tootin'
I really need to post bike pics. I know I promised. Shani, It's the Israelites that are doing most of the killing. Don't you care about others?
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
10-03-09, 06:42 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
bump'n
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - April 12th, '08 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 09-04-08 07:03 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - October 13th, '07 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 10-10-07 09:59 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - June 16th, '07 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 1 | 13-06-07 09:34 AM |