P2P-Zone  

Go Back   P2P-Zone > Political Asylum
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 17-07-07, 06:45 AM   #30
malvachat
My eyes are now open.
 
malvachat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
Default

I can see where your coming from Mazer.
What I've picked out is.

"You see, we're not really talking about freedom of speech here, we're talking about actions and consequences"

"The 1st Amendment does exactly what it says, preventing congress from making laws that abridge our freedom of speech. Consequence is not abridgment so the Constitution doesn't protect us from the consequences of our words and it shouldn't"

I suppose it's the consequences that happen to restrict your free speech.To me that's the same.This price to pay thing.
I fully understand there has to be limits.

Now sinner said this
"But when it comes to criticizing government and government officials,free and open discussion should be allowed without fear of retribution"

And he says

"Yes I do. Cindy Sheehan, Mike Moore, John Stewart, Al Franken, Bill Maher, etc etc etc

Have not all these people been personally attacked.
Not the issue they have raised?
Are they not tarred with a brush as being "far left nut jobs"?
This happens the other way round as well of course.
Neo cons comes to mind.
Shoot the messenger sort of thing is what I find so wrong in a so called free society.It happens here in the UK as well.

"Theoretically the federal government has the ability, under the 16th Amendment of the Constitution, to tax up to 100% of our income"

I'm a bit puzzled about this one.
It stands to reason I'm not a student of the constitution,but I watched this a while ago and wondered about this tax thing.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...arch&plindex=0

Now,as to

"ignoring what sinner and albed have written for a moment"

Sinner I don't mind at all,sometimes he say daft things.but mostly he answers from his point of view without the silly name calling.
For example
Daft thing to say.
"Don’t care about international law"
Answers from his point of view
"the USA is far far from becoming a Fascist State"
What I said was they're "going down the road to a fascist state"
Albed can sometimes can say some sensible thing,I have even agreed with him on a couple of occasions(I know shame on me)But the silly chat is like listening to a child in a school yard.So to tell me to become a man is so silly.
But now I know he's a brain surgeon I'll see him differently.

"I can reorganize those damaged brain cells"
Do you get medals for doing that as well?
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas
malvachat is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - January 7th, 2006 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 1 05-01-06 02:20 PM
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - December 24th, ’05 JackSpratts Peer to Peer 5 25-12-05 08:09 PM
Another 9/11-Style Attack Is Good For Bush Repo Political Asylum 17 17-07-04 05:23 PM
COUP D'ETAT:The Real reason Tenet and Pavitt resigned from the CIA floydian slip Political Asylum 4 09-06-04 08:02 PM
Europeans Like Bush Even Less Than Before JackSpratts Political Asylum 24 20-05-04 08:08 PM






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)