|
Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
18-12-06, 02:51 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
|
WASTE 1.6 "Special Edition"
I've been using Waste for about a month or so now and have really been enjoying it. One thing I was curious about though is how many of you have tried the v1.6 "special edition?" When I first looked at Waste for possible use I went to their main website where the most current version is listed as 1.5 beta3. However, I also looked on wikipedia and found this:
"A "non-official" 1.6 Windows edition addresses some UI and privacy concerns." Well... I was curious about what this v1.6 might have to offer and so I went searching for it. I found it here. So I personally use v1.6 and have never used any other version. I was just wondering how many of you use it also. Also, the forum where v1.6 is posted has many interesting things related to Waste (including projects based on Waste). You can find it here. Hope this is of interest to some of you. -AngryGnome |
18-12-06, 04:38 PM | #2 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
ok, just to be clear, the only "official" waste client is that of the developer justin frankel. released three and a half years ago it works surprisingly well for an application that hasn’t been publicly updated since, but it got the ball rolling as it were and hence the interest and the sourceforge project. while these have been called "official" releases they are really an offshoot of frankel's original client, modified by well meaning coders yes, but no more official than a mod you yourself might choose to develop - and since even these new updates have been dwindling of late it may just be a matter of time before other users take up the call and jump in with refined mods like crypton did last summer - or move along to something else, like a new system entirely.
it's fair to say then that all present modifications of legacy v.1 are ultimately "non-official." this distinction is actually an important one. it goes to the heart of something waste users hold very dear, and that is their own security. it's one thing to trust your fortune to frankel, it's quite another to put it in the hands of anyone who comes along claiming to offer "improvements." this is not to say sourceforge is somehow lacking in some respect. indeed, if any group should take on the project they are perhaps the most transparent. the issue instead is balance. that is to say how much are updates worth compared to the cost of possible vulnerabilities? that answer is highly personal, but suffice to say there are those whose needs lean more to sanctuary than expediency. this is not surprising. with so many regularly updated file-trading clients out there like utorrent and soulseek, there are plenty of choices for ease of use and speed, but if security is paramount the list dwindles quickly. there are for-instance long-term meshes still using the original client, operating in complete anonymity and rigorously so, even after all this time. it's not particularly surprising; frankel's creation was a brilliant piece of work in 2003. in 2007 so it remains. i haven't used crypton's modified sourceforge release and i probably won't, since i'm one of those users happy with the original official client, but if you and others get it going in a larger mesh angrygnome let us know how you fare. - js. |
18-12-06, 05:20 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18
|
I have never used the original Waste client. Perhaps I will try it out. One thing I do like about v1.6 (this may also be true for other versions but I know it is not the case with the original) is that it acts as a standalone exe. You can run it without having to install. This is a big plus in my book.
Anyway, thanks for the info. I'll check out the original version sometime soon. -AngryGnome |
18-12-06, 06:14 PM | #4 |
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
Hell, Jack, you make it sound like there's no room for improvement.
So, most of the WASTE updates up 'till now have been cosmetic. Big deal. Official is a useless term in the open source world to begin with. Which one is the 'official' GNU/Linux distribution? There is no such thing. Is Cohen's mainline BitTorrent client the 'official' client, or just the one that came first? Bittorrent purists are actually shying away from the mainline client because it's designed to participate in BitTorrent's nascent commercial distribution network. Being the only client that is actively developed by the original Bittorrent creator doesn't make it the only useful one. Frankel has disowned his own creations. He quit Nullsoft because he no longer had control over Winamp's development. He didn't participate in Gnutella's development after he leaked the source code almost seven years ago, and it still became ubiquitous without his help. Now WASTE is languishing in relative obscurity and has not attracted any new developers in more than a year. Useful as it is, it's becoming more dinosauric as time goes by while Frankel has moved on to bigger and better projects. WASTE is the 8-track of secure file sharing. It's time for something better. |
18-12-06, 06:54 PM | #5 |
The Fungus Among Us
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 152
|
What would you suggest these days, Mazer? I know you still use Waste. Is there a better option? Just wondering, not looking for debate.
__________________
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. – P.J. O'Rourke None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. – Goethe A truth that's told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent. - William Blake P2P Consortium |
18-12-06, 07:19 PM | #6 | |||
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
Quote:
Quote:
disown is a strong word. it denotes action frankel hasn’t to my knowledge taken (for all i know he’s working privately). he’s appears to have lost interest in public collaborations certainly. Quote:
- js. |
|||
18-12-06, 08:11 PM | #7 | |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Quote:
now if this new version had some sort of switch you could add to the shortcut where it could run with either the early or later client might be bonus |
|
18-12-06, 09:56 PM | #8 | ||
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
Quote:
By the way, if I sound argumentative I apologize. Maybe I've been spending too much time in the Political Asylum. Quote:
AllPeers looks like a good alternative, though it does lack a group chat feature. It doesn't organize users into meshes like WASTE does; all connections are one to one so you can add someone to your personal buddy list without exposing the identities or files that others in your buddy list are sharing with you. No permission is required which means you have total control over your connection to your peers. WASTE by contrast builds webs of trust and forces individuals to consider other people because the actions of one individual can affect the whole group. This is not always a good thing, given the low level of rationality and maturity that many internet users demonstrate. I've seen groupthink split meshes apart and drive members away. WASTE just isn't for everybody, in fact it's not for most people. I've learned a lot about prejudice and fear from my experiences with WASTE. The software is more like a mad scientist's social experiment than a serious file sharing tool, but it does the job as advertised. In the future I'd prefer to use an encrypted file sharing tool that does not raise animosity and make people afraid of the outside world, and my search for a program with those features continues. Last edited by Mazer : 18-12-06 at 10:07 PM. |
||
19-12-06, 01:45 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
Just something to keep in mind.
__________________
Malk-a-mite =================== Insert clever .sig file here =================== |
|
19-12-06, 06:13 AM | #10 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
Quote:
|
|
19-12-06, 09:08 AM | #11 | ||
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
19-12-06, 03:15 PM | #12 | ||
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
Quote:
if only it were true! imagine hopping into a multi-colored van and being greeted with "Dude! You gotta check out this new MESH!" Quote:
you've just described every private tracker i've ever visited lol. ditto btw soulseek and its own brand of ban-mad power-sharers. in the p2p community waste has no monopoly on social tension and uber-cliques, peculiar or otherwise. one need only gaze back at the turbulent genesis of this very forum to see that. but yes, as long as apathy, member differences or a determined troll can disrupt a community then waste groups, like any social organization will be vulnerable. on the other hand since no one can be forced to leave under any circumstances i’m always happily surprised to see meshes lasting as long as they do. - js. |
||
19-12-06, 05:40 PM | #13 |
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
Well there's always that I guess. My own Wasted experiences have never turned me against anyone, I've only ever watch it happen to other people. Once a mesh does manage to settle into a groove it's a beautiful thing. Building a successful mesh is a growing experience for all those involved, and the reward is longevity. But is filesharing really supposed to be a test of character?
The answer is probably blowin' in the wind or something. I think the security WASTE provides is sufficient, but there's room for improvement in its social features. Does the way WASTE brings out the paranoia in people enhance its security in any way? I don't think it does and if that effect could be eliminated then it would be for the better. That's why I'm not a WASTE purist. Last edited by Mazer : 19-12-06 at 05:51 PM. |
20-12-06, 03:31 AM | #14 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
The only noteworthy difference between version 1.6 and SourceForge version 1.5 beta 3 seems to be the end-to-end encrypted PM feature of 1.6. I can imagine situations where some special small group members might wish for another layer of trust like that but for normal filesharers the feature seems quite useless. The basic need for a filesharing group is to protect the network from hostile outsiders; version 1.6 protects private communications of group members A and B from a curious group member C that would have to use a modified client to spy PMs of A and B that happen to be routed through C - a rather hypothetical threat, especially as no developer has made such modified clients available so far.
As for the differences between Justin Frankel's original version and SourceForge 1.5b3 version, I think there are a couple of practically meaningful new features on 1.5b3 that make me recommend it to new groups instead of the original version. First: the new stealth mode, which encrypts the initial handshaking routines of WASTE clients when they connect to each other. This makes it harder for hostile third parties to detect that you are using WASTE in the first place - which might help you to avoid e.g. p2p traffic shaping at your ISP. Second: longer chat messages. This may sound like a small thing but anybody who has used the original client any longer knows how annoying it can be when your chat message is cropped but you are not aware of it. I think the original client allowed some 256 characters in a chat line, the 1.5+ versions allow 1024. 1.5b3 also has a nice broadcast feature that allows you to send a message to all group members (just open a chat channel named $$broadcast and send messages there).
__________________
My Blog: Reflections on P2P Revolution |
20-12-06, 04:22 AM | #15 | |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Quote:
and never realized that was there Thanks TG! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Zer0share Project | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 515 | 19-08-07 07:18 AM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - March 27th, '04 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 2 | 30-03-04 01:33 PM |
Peer-To-Peer News - The Week In Review - June 14th, '03 | JackSpratts | Peer to Peer | 2 | 12-06-03 11:32 PM |
what a waste.. | multi | Peer to Peer | 1 | 04-06-03 11:17 PM |