|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
12-08-05, 06:12 PM | #1 | |||
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
fuck..my clock said 10 minutes...you're not abusing your mod powers are you? I don't see an edit notice. |
|||
12-08-05, 06:22 PM | #2 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,023
|
lol @ "intelligent reply." albed your non-techincal posts are little more than schoolyard taunts. if you remove the insults from your comments there's nothing left but nouns.
- js. |
12-08-05, 06:47 PM | #3 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
You're right. I waited till my clock said 8:13 before starting my reply but it could be off a minute or two. I'm not complaining because your post was a little lamer originally. Last edited by albed : 13-08-05 at 06:51 AM. Reason: enough time to spot the adjective....shame, clock was 3 mins fast-fixed it |
|
14-08-05, 05:35 PM | #4 |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
|
14-08-05, 11:21 PM | #5 |
Earthbound misfit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Moses Lake, Washington
Posts: 2,563
|
If he sees that ad then he won't have to meet with her, she said it all.
|
15-08-05, 02:33 AM | #6 |
My eyes are now open.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford uk
Posts: 1,409
|
Well,she looks like a raving Liberal.
Isn't there a law against people like her? If not,there soon will be. Asking the President questions indeed, whatever next?
__________________
Beer is for life not just Christmas |
15-08-05, 06:18 AM | #7 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Seriously, who gives-a-fuck?
There's a thousand legitimate questions that President Bush should be answering - and he should be being asked them by a focused, serious media... But instead of asking them, we're stuck with this ridiculous circus act, where the questions are somehow ignored, in favour of 'continued coverage' of the baloney "David v Goliath" story that the news networks love to jerk off to, knowing that it can be drawn out over the course of a couple of weeks without actually tackling the reasons for the action. Of course she's being manipulated by 'the left'... of course it's a bullshit set-up! What did Sheehan or anyone else expect? Cindy Sheehan can eat the dirt that the Presidential motorcade flicks up in her face. I dislike this populistic method of critique at the best of times (purely because it falls so easily into the hands of the info-tainment departments of every news channel) but when the detailed lies and abuses of power of Government are boiled down to a single issue of a protesters argument... ugh... no thankyou. In such turbulent times, we need upstanding journalists who are prepared to grill politicians and ask questions that may lead to them being barred from press rooms. We need thorough, sober and hard-nosed critique, not another performing seal that will just add to the superficial bullshit of 'news coverage'.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
12-08-05, 06:37 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,023
|
Quote:
- js. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|