|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
23-03-05, 03:17 AM | #1 |
Semiblind
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,857
|
Alternatives?
Given that the majority of political leaders seem hopelessly out of touch with the constituancy, do you ever forsee -in your lifetime- any possible alternative political parties gaining enough of a following to topple the Repubs and/or Dems?
|
23-03-05, 04:00 AM | #2 |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
To be honest, I think your country is more likely to implode before it drags itself out of the two-party system. That is not meant to be a slate against the US - it's just that I really can't see how a country, so dependant on an antagonistic and diametric form of democracy, can ever begin to consider a genuine "third way" (I shudder when I use that term... it was Blair's phrase back in '97).
Culturally speaking, the US seems to revel in polarised and extremist debate - or at least, this is how things appear at a national level from the outsider perspective. There's a lot of frankly nasty bullshit spoken about the US and its sometimes difficult to get an accurate representation of US culture - especially one so diverse in a country so large. But to me, there appears to be a mindest of 'us and them' ingrained within US political culture - a mindset that permeates both internal and external US debates/policy, and is ultimately appealing in it's simplicity to mass media outlets that fuel debate. Britain fares only a little better. We have three 'main' parties (with the usual compendium of greens, independants and fascists on the fringe) who tend to continually act like children, telling sneaky lies about the other parties, arguing with eachother and successfully avoiding coming close to a reasonable solution. Our media still plays the simplistic 'bounce one off the other' routine, but usually manages to do it with a greater degree of objectivity and lesser aggression (and without the sinister manipulation) than what I've viewed of US TV news. Put simply, even if it was achievable, a third party won't necessarily solve the problem of aloof, cruddy politicians. On a final note, you do actually have a third option.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
23-03-05, 06:06 AM | #3 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
the best-organized attempt at breaking out of the 2 party system is being conducted in New Hampshire by the Libertarians, in the form of the Free State Project:
Quote:
|
|
25-03-05, 07:24 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,522
|
Quote:
__________________
May your tote always stay tight and your edge eversharp :wink: |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|