|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
06-01-04, 09:32 AM | #1 |
everything you do
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: wlll come back around to you
Posts: 3,982
|
compel em. buy em. do something!
Strained U.S. Army Offers Fat Re-Enlistment Bonuses
2 hours, 42 minutes ago By Charles Aldinger WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army, stressed by global deployments, is offering re-enlistment bonuses of up to $10,000 to soldiers in Iraq , Afghanistan and Kuwait, Army officials said on Monday. Soldiers currently in those countries -- and others headed there in the coming three months to replace them -- could receive lump payments of between $5,000 and $10,000 for enlisting for at least three years of additional Army service, the officials told reporters. The drive to keep troops came as the Army said it would prohibit soldiers serving in or rotating home from Iraq and Afghanistan this winter and spring from retiring or leaving the service for other reasons while there or for up to 90 days after returning to their home bases. Col. Elton Manske, a spokesman in the office of the Army's deputy chief of staff, said the Army had budgeted $63 million for the re-enlistment program in the current fiscal year ending next Sept. 30. "It (the money) is there and we are aggressively looking to get soldiers to take advantage of it," Manske said. But he said studies showed no indication that troops were preparing to leave the volunteer service in large numbers when their current contracts ended. The American military, especially the Army, is suffering stress from global deployments of tens of thousands of troops in the wake of the 2001 attacks on America. Officials said regular Army troops now in Iraq and Afghanistan who will rotate home in the coming months will not be allowed to retire or leave while they are there in order to maintain key "in-together, out-together" unit integrity. Manske and other army officials said the 90-day "stop loss" period after the units return home was to allow soldiers whose enlistments are up or who wanted to retire after 20 or more years of service to muster out of uniform efficiently and to take advantage of job training for the civilian sector. There are 1.4 million active-duty troops in the American military, including 480,000 Army soldiers, and some senior Army officers have privately called for increases in the number of troops in that service because they have borne the brunt of the deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. REPLACING SOLDIERS The Pentagon is preparing to begin replacing the roughly 123,000 U.S. troops serving in Iraq and 11,000 in Afghanistan -- most of them Army soldiers -- with fresh troops. Among the first units rotating home beginning this month will be the 101st Airborne Division from Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Members of both parties in Congress have argued that the Army is too small to perform its duties in Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea and elsewhere and needs thousands of more soldiers. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has said he remains "absolutely open-minded" about a possible increase in the number of soldiers in the Army but told reporters earlier that he has seen no evidence of that need. Ted Carpenter, a defense analyst with the Cato Institute think tank, said the "stop loss" decision undercuts the concept of an all-volunteer military, which America has maintained for three decades. "Clearly, if large numbers of personnel have their terms extended against their will, that violates the principle of volunteerism," Carpenter said. "It also suggests just how strained the military is in trying to provide for the Iraqi occupation plus all the other U.S. obligations around the world." from ---------------------------------------------------------- lets see, ive read and seen storys about wounded US soldiers who after returning and getting treated, then sent home - a leg or whatever, were then told my their commanders that when they dident have enough money to buy food, well do what all of hungry America is being told to do, go beg at a church or something. Dont expect the army to feed ya or yer kids. what was the embarrasingly low amount i heard US soldiers get payed for fighting in Iraq? and with high level peeps starting to publicly admit we might be there for 'years' wonder why less peeps are raceing in to join. so how long before the draft? still wanna vote for Bushie? |
06-01-04, 09:39 AM | #2 |
Bumbling idiot
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, CA
Posts: 787
|
I think anyone supporting the war should be fully ready to join the army. First in line guys, come on!
|
06-01-04, 10:57 AM | #3 | ||
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
Shhh greedy, we're not supposed to talk about that.
From some funny articles I ran across a while back: this Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-01-04, 11:07 AM | #4 | |
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,260
|
Quote:
i'd join the army in a heart beat if you were used as a target practice dummy. |
|
06-01-04, 11:19 AM | #5 |
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
The trouble with guys like you span is you all get used up in the front lines early on.
Ah well, Darwinian evolution at work. |
06-01-04, 11:48 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,260
|
Quote:
|
|
06-01-04, 11:56 AM | #7 | |
Formal Ball Proof
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,948
|
Quote:
|
|
06-01-04, 12:08 PM | #8 | |
everything you do
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: wlll come back around to you
Posts: 3,982
|
Quote:
you mean the ones you always respond to? |
|
06-01-04, 02:09 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,260
|
Quote:
|
|
06-01-04, 04:23 PM | #10 |
--------------------
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,379
|
Speaking of conspiracies......"Fair and Balanced"
Fox fattens lead on CNN in peak year for cable news http://www.ajc.com/business/content/...06ratings.html
__________________
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend |
06-01-04, 05:37 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,260
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-04, 02:14 AM | #12 | |
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
George W. Bush Loves Michael Jackson... Have a read... I've posted this link before but I think it sums up 24-hour news coverage.
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 |
|
07-01-04, 10:43 AM | #13 | |
--------------------
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,379
|
Quote:
Your link was ignored, I don't believe G.W. Loves Michael Jackson...... Anyhow, who decides what is and is not relavant to individuals around the world? You? Those channels spit out all kinds of different news from all around the world. Some--maybe a lot-- I find irrelavant, like what JLo and Ben had for supper the night before but there are people out there who care about that sort of shit, so they tell it. Well things are looking up//// PepsiCo inks deal with Iraqi bottler No. 2 soft-drink maker signs a deal with Baghdad Soft Drinks to distribute its products in Iraq. NEW YORK (Reuters) - PepsiCo Inc., the nation's second-largest soft drink maker, said on Wednesday it signed a deal with Baghdad Soft Drinks Co. to bottle and distribute Pepsi products in Iraq. The move, which the company said is expected to create about 2,000 jobs at Baghdad Soft Drinks, marks PepsiCo's return to Iraq after a 13-year absence mandated by international trade sanctions. PepsiCo entered the Iraq market in 1950. The deal calls for Baghdad Soft Drinks to bottle PepsiCo's trademark Pepsi-Cola as well as its Seven-Up and Mirinda drinks. http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/07/news...reut/index.htm
__________________
The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend |
|
07-01-04, 11:43 AM | #14 |
Thanks for being with arse
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
|
Claim: Coca-Cola was once considered anti-Semitic for refusing to do business in Israel.
Status: True. Origins: The last thirty-odd years have seen allegations of anti-Semitism hurled at both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, and for both companies the charges stemmed from their one-time reluctance to do business with Israel. Successfully doing business in the Middle East often depended upon not doing business in Israel. The Arab League was quick to boycott, and multinational concerns were forced to choose between the smaller market of Israel and the much larger market of the combined Arab states. For firms caught in the middle, it was a "no win" situation. Coca-Cola's turn in the harsh spotlight of public opinion came in 1966. April 1 1966: At a press conference in Tel Aviv, businessman Moshe Bornstein accused Coca-Cola of refusing to do business in Israel out of fear of reprisals and loss of profits in the Arab soft drink market. A week later in New York, the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith released a statement backing up the charges, triggering headlines across the U.S.A. Coca-Cola was in hot water, and the American public was demanding answers. It was also rejecting the answers it was getting. In 1949 Coca-Cola had attempted to open a bottling plant in Israel, but its efforts had been blocked by the Israeli government. As long as no one questioned the company too closely, the failure of this one stab at the Israeli market appeared to provide a satisfactory answer for Coca-Cola's conspicuous absence from the Israeli market. In the meanwhile, Coca-Cola was content to continue quietly serving the much larger Arab market, a market it was likely to lose if it began operating in Israel. In 1961 an incident in Cairo involving civil servant Mohammad Abu Shadi momentarily shattered the quiet. Shadi had come into possession of a Coca-Cola bottle manufactured in Ethiopia, mistaken the Amharic lettering on its label for Hebrew, and publicly accused Coca-Cola of doing business with Israel. The manager of Coca-Cola's Egyptian bottling operations wasted no time (and little thought) in assuring the press that Coca-Cola would never allow the Israelis a franchise. With their hands forced by their bottler's impolitic statement, company officials quickly invented the explanation that Israel was too small to support a franchise and gave their reasons for staying away as purely economic, not political. For the time being, this seemed to keep a lid on the brewing storm. It wasn't until 1966 that people began to wonder openly why it was that nearby Cyprus had no difficulty supporting its Coca-Cola franchise despite their having only one-tenth the population of Israel. The comfortable aura of quiet was shattered by Bornstein's charges and the subsequent uproar they raised in the U.S.A. When these issues came to light in 1966, they proved highly embarrassing to Coca-Cola. The administrators of Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan announced they would stop serving Coke, and the owners of Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Emporium on Coney Island followed suit. Faced with the prospect of a Jewish boycott in America, the company attempted to right the tipped canoe by announcing it would open a bottling plant in Tel Aviv. (Such is the price of business: Israel with the fury of America behind it became a much more attractive market than it ever had been all on its own.) The Arab League struck back by placing Coca-Cola on its boycott list. The boycott began in August 1968 and lasted until May 1991 (or until 1979 in Egypt, where they made their own rules). Pepsi's entry into Israel in 1992 did not go smoothly — the evolution theme of its "Choice of a New Generation" ad campaign (in which man was portrayed as evolving from a monkey into a Pepsi drinker) angered the strictly observant haredi community. Though Pepsi pulled the campaign from Israel, it found itself in more hot water over a 1993 Michael Jackson tour. Jackson's unthinking flashbulb-popping arrival on a Sabbath was viewed by many observant Jews as a desecration. For a time Pepsi lost its kashrut (kosher) certificate because it was deemed to be promoting a culture that would corrupt the nation's youth through rock music concerts and advertisements featuring scantily-clad women. Prior to 1992, Pepsi had backed the other horse, choosing to service the lucrative Coke-less Arab markets in the boycott days. For its decision to stay out of Israel (and thus itself avoid being placed on the Arab League's blacklist), Pepsi faced continued criticism in the United States. In certain circles it was considered politically incorrect to be seen drinking Pepsi. The Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith investigated claims that Pepsi was participating in the boycott of Israel. U.S. law prohibited American companies from taking part in this boycott, but the law was vague, and outright violations were hard to pin down. Nothing ever came of the investigations, and Pepsi was never placed on the American government's list of violators. Pepsi always denied it was the fear of losing their Arab markets that kept them out of Israel. Like Coca-Cola in 1961, Pepsi fell back upon the claim of Israel's being too small to support a franchise. At least this time the excuse was a bit more believable -- Coca-Cola's already holding down the lion's share of the Israeli soft drink market gave this claim a bit more plausibility. Even so, Pepsi was doing business in many other small markets and much more often than not competing head-to-head against Coca-Cola. If these conditions were keeping them out of Israel, then why weren't they equally keeping them out of these other markets? Many people in the United States believed Pepsi was going along with the boycott, whether it was proveable in the eyes of U.S. law or not. Those lucrative Arab markets did not come without a price, and Pepsi paid it in loss of goodwill in the U.S. A significant number of American cola drinkers grew up suspecting Pepsi of being anti-Israel and refrained from buying their product. By contrast, Coca-Cola appeared heroic. This appearance failed to take into account Coca-Cola's fast stepping to shake off similar charges in the 1960s. Pepsi's mud-spattered skirts were but Coca-Cola's hand-me-downs — same skirt, just a bit older. Today you can get either Coke or Pepsi in anywhere in the Middle East, and the days of the boycott have faded into memory. Even so, there are still those who observe the stricture of "Coke is for Jews; Pepsi is for Arabs." Old wounds are not necessarily healed wounds. Barbara "Pepsi challenge" Mikkelson from |
08-01-04, 01:59 AM | #15 | |||
BANG BANG BANG (repeat as necessary)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere
Posts: 1,327
|
[rant]
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Actually, (now that I read my own post again), I don't object to the occasional trashy news subject, what annoys me is when 24-hour news channels seem to be desperately seaching for something to talk about - not because it informs those watching, but because it's easier than sitting there infront of the cameras and being honest by saying: "well shit, we told you all we know, so now we're going to tell you again and add-in some made-up stuff, to make it seem like we're making progress on a story". I must say, CNN and FOX are quite good at it - they're very smooth and never seem to get ruffled by a lack of journalistic progress (actually journalism's the wrong word). In the UK, we're subjected to BBC-24 and the ITV News Channel. They're terrible to watch because the lack of anything to update a story is obvious. I'll give you a hint - see if you notice it next time you watch a 24-hour 'news' channel... as soon as the presenter starts speaking slowly (or even stutters) he or she will start asking incisive questions like: "Errr, yes... so... what's the mood like there, Simon?" I love it when they ask that question - it makes me feel so empowered knowing that I know what 'the mood' is like. "The mood here, after this momentous succcess, is jubilant, John" (like the humungous crowd of people behind Simon, jumping up and down and slapping themselves in the face, didn't already inform me of that fact)... or "The mood, here in Iraq, is very low, John" (like people being blown up and shot in the face makes this unexpected - there's nothing like being cracked over the head by a disgruntled soldier to 'lower your mood'. I'm so glad Simon made the effort to tell me how 'Iraq' or 'Basra' is feeling... Hey... did you know that the mood in my diary is 'papery' or that 'Albania' is currently feeling albany-ish?) In particular, I like the way the presenters ask the reporters questions, whilest simultaneously providing the answer... (this question is usually a follow-up to the 'mood' question)... "Simon, there's a sense of [insert emotion/cogntion] in the air, is there not?" Simon then has to do one of two things, he can either cling to the shreds of reality and go with: "No John, actually, there's a sense of lavender in the air", or he can just go along with the rubbish line of questioning with, "Yes... John, I really cant tell you how the [insert emotion/cognition] is growing here [cue mindless fluffy waffle about whatever fills time]". On a final note, I recently dropped in on FOX news a few weeks back. Now, I hate bashing FOX news for it's attempts to appeal to the lowest common denominator - it's kinda like giving retarded people a hard time for being so slow... but I was a bit pissed off by the way they flash up one-word captions beneath news items (kinda reminded me of that scene in 'Clockwork Orange')... as if I was monumentally stupid enough not to understand the concepts that some dicknose politician was yacking on about... "DANGER"... "STAB"... "SECURITY"... went the captions, like some spastic attempt to reinforce a point... ...and as for that constant little box in the left hand corner with the "TERROR ALERT" sign... [/rant]
__________________
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction" Dick Cheney - August 26, 2002 "I did not authorise the leaking of the name of David Kelly. Nobody was authorised to name David Kelly. I believe we have acted properly throughout" Tony Blair - July 22, 2003 Last edited by tambourine-man : 08-01-04 at 08:43 AM. |
|||
08-01-04, 11:09 AM | #16 | |
everything you do
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: wlll come back around to you
Posts: 3,982
|
Re: [rant]
Quote:
hahahahahhhah gooooood post dood man! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|