|
Political Asylum Publicly Debate Politics, War, Media. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
21-06-04, 11:09 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 123
|
The Bush Gang...
It has become pretty much obvious to anyone but the hardened Bush supporters that Bush and his administration whether intentionally or unintentionally and I happen to believe intentionally, misled the American public to believe there was a working relationship between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Countless times Bush, Cheney and the rest of the Bush gang twisted their words to imply that Saddam was somehow connected to the 9-11 attacks and used their twisted words and logic to gather public support for a war with Iraq. But anyone with the slightest understanding of Middle East history knows that Saddam Hussein's secular Iraq was no favorite of bin Laden; the two didn't particularly like each other and the myth that bin Laden and Saddam were working together is as believable as Pat Robertson working with Senator Kerry to overthrow George W. Bush. It makes no sense except for those ignorant of the Middle East...
The Bush gang and their supporters like to call the Iraq War part of the war on terror but in fact it only became part of the war on terror after Bush took out Saddam and Iraq's borders letting the rogue terrorists into Iraq. Saddam was a dictator and dictators don't let Islamic fundamentalists run around their country for the simple reason they don't want to be overthrown by them... Now the 9-11 commission has come out and stated the obvious, that Saddam Hussein had no "collaborative relationship" with bin Laden's al-Qaeda in regards to 9-11. This little fact is lost on the Bush gang who continue to claim a relationship existed between Saddam and bin Laden if for no other reason than to save face in front of the American people. The reasons Bush went to war with Iraq was due to the imminent danger of weapons of mass destruction and his linkage of Saddam to al-Qaeda, both reasons a year later have yet to be proven. That on top of lying that Saddam "sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa," lying that Saddam Hussein had portable mobile biological labs, lying that Saddam had unmanned drones that could drop biological weapons on the continental United States. The Bush gang also mislead the country claiming that overthrowing Iraq would be simple because the Iraqis would greet the Americans as liberators with candies and flowers not the improvised explosive devices and gunfire that American troops have been greeted with in their ongoing liberation... Absolutely everything the Bush gang has said was either a lie or just plain wrong. So the Bush gang has no choice but to continue their travesty of reason because to admit that Saddam Hussein had no "collaborative relationship" with al-Qaeda would be to admit the war with Iraq was an error. So Bush, Cheney, Rice, Powell and the rest of their gang continue to do what they do best, mislead the American public and deny the truth while American soldiers die for their mistakes... Bill Clinton may have left a DNA stain in the Oval Office but Bush left a bloodstain, the bloodstain of the dead American soldiers. Taking the country to war under false pretenses isn't an impeachable offence but lying about sex is, talk about twisted logic... |
21-06-04, 12:03 PM | #2 | |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
Quote:
- js. |
|
21-06-04, 03:29 PM | #3 | |
Alpha Male
Join Date: May 2001
Location: In Limbo
Posts: 2,005
|
Quote:
|
|
21-06-04, 03:43 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
Quote:
- js. |
|
22-06-04, 01:05 AM | #5 | |
Alpha Male
Join Date: May 2001
Location: In Limbo
Posts: 2,005
|
Quote:
I still chuckle daily at the ignorant liberals that still think Bin laden and Saddam signed receipts that stated "For Terrorist acts against USA", and then saved them in file cabinets for Tax purposes. Then there's the truly brain dead liberals that believe there is absolutely no way Saddam slipped a few million in cold hard untraceable CASH to Bin laden to help him in his attack. Since when do criminals leave paper trails? We will never know for sure if Saddan did or didn't because neither he nor Bin laden will ever admit to it, nor can we be sure what may be buried in that huge desert known as Iraq. I did NOT have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski WOW how quickly the libs dismiss their beloveds well documented LIE |
|
22-06-04, 07:22 AM | #6 | |
flippin 'em off
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: the real world
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
Hell, knowing Hillary I'd feel sympathy for the guy, but the way he treated what he thought was a helpless woman...that is until the "stain" turned the tables. I can imagine what he'd have done to her without the hard evidence that he was the lying scumbag. He'd still be repeating his famous phrase. |
|
22-06-04, 08:22 AM | #7 |
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 10,024
|
jc, instead of taking the most convoluted avenues possible in excusing his behaviour when you even begin to hold bush accountable for his lies i'll begin to take you seriously. until then it's just liberal bashing for bashings sake.
- js. |
22-06-04, 12:17 AM | #8 | |
I took both pills.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where 'strange' is a prerequisite.
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
__________________
Some people exist just to annoy me |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|