|
Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
24-07-03, 12:13 PM | #1 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
First RIAA hit list of Kazaa users
From Zeropaid:
The following user names were pulled from subpoenas filed with the US District Court in Washington, DC. A total of 253 RIAA subpoenas were listed as of July 22 through the federal court system's paid online database, PACER. The actual subpoenas are available to view online in about half the cases. The court documents don't show individual users' real names. They do show file-sharing network user names, the user's ISP, the user's IP address, and a sampling of copyright songs the user allegedly made available for download. Aab@Kazaa Aboggs2@Kazaa allstatetide@Kazaa Amissann2@Kazaa AngelaMikesell@Kazaa anon39023@Kazaa anthonybotz@Kazaa aoster1@Kazaa Ariel167@fileshare asheejojo@Kazaa Ashley@Grokster azn_bahamut@Kazaa B.B.C@Kazaa badandy@Kazaa Benchy987@Kazaa Bigeasssy24@Kazaa Bigpimpinitopey187@Kazaa bigjohnhc@Kazaa blazel@Kazaa bluemonkey13@Kazaa Boilermaker1214@Kazaa brentandjonna@Kazaa brich410@Kazaa budman5000@Kazaa Bush323@Kazaa cado@Kazaa Carolyn@fileshare Casal@Kazaa cbegalle@Kazaa cherriie@Kazaa CLOVER77@Kazaa Corky101@Kazaa Cortez1023@Kazaa CowgirlMDR@Kazaa crazyface@Kazaa d-dubb@Grokster dallass@Kazaa daredevil@Kazaa DEFAINCE357@Kazaa definitely_ditzy@Kazaa dimples0530@Kazaa dmadigan@Kazaa dotzbadger@Kazaa dubcha@Kazaa dulfingurl2@Kazaa Dyellagurl22@Kazaa Dziion@Kazaa eddieh@Kazaa emmi4@Kazaa enbbarnes@Kazaa ERIKA@Kazaa felicia_alvarado@Kazaa flowerpower0818@fileshare fox3j@Kazaa freckles72587@Kazaa fritzbuilding@Kazaa Generalby@Kazaa Ghettobootybabe8@Kazaa h2ochamp@kazaa harris@Kazaa heather_thee_amazing@Kazaa hoami316@Kazaa hooterzzz@Kazaa hottdude0587@Kazaa HyDang@Kazaa ilovemydez@Kazaa indepunk74@Kazaa inthisroom@Kazaa jamonie@Kazaa JE_WV@Kazaa Jeff@Kazaa Jessica@Kazaa jim@Kazaa joanjett@Kazaa joe@Kazaa jomada@Kazaa JustineRiot@Kazaa kelney12@Kazaa kenne007@Kazaa KrAyZiE@Kazaa ktgurl13@Grokster kunstrukter@Kazaa ladypimp8669@Kazaa laurelbean@Kazaa leahpate@Kazaa LiLHuNnIe1480@Kazaa Lisweet@Kazaa Lyssy348@Kazaa madkirk@fileshare Marge4131@Kazaa Marla262@Kazaa mgokey@Kazaa mike@Kazaa Motivator@Kazaa munkeyspanker21@Kazaa nikki@Kazaa Niltiak@Kazaa Nodopefor2@Kazaa paulina@Kazaa pdia@Kazaa PDJ1846@Kazaa Playgirlmama@Kazaa Prtythug23@Kazaa qjade512@Kazaa rebecca_m_122@Kazaa rips42@Kazaa rochelle@Kazaa RockOn182@Kazaa samlionofzino@Kazaa shakobe@Kazaa shonga84@Kazaa sk8boyben@Kazaa sneil@Kazaa soccerdog@Kazaa StolenSi@Kazaa sus@Kazaa Sweet3114@Kazaa sweetthang1421@Kazaa TheLastReal7@Kazaa TMONEYNDHIZOUSE@kazaa Tyler@Kazaa Unit984@Kazaa Westly_NoGood@Kazaa www.k_lite.tk_Kazaa_Lite@Kazaa |
24-07-03, 01:11 PM | #2 |
R.I.P napho 1-31-16
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Venus
Posts: 16,723
|
Wow, that's quite a list. (tho I was sure I wouldn't be on it, and I'm not)
__________________
I love you napho and I will weep forever.......... |
24-07-03, 02:40 PM | #3 |
everything you do
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: wlll come back around to you
Posts: 3,982
|
hahaha pretty sure that klite tk one is the default name it starts you with, and theres always 1000s using it.
|
24-07-03, 04:40 PM | #4 | |
Vos vestros servate, meos mihi linquite mores.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,795
|
Re: First RIAA hit list of Kazaa users
Quote:
"Mr Munkeyspanker, could you please tell the Court why you think what you were doing was legal?" "Excuse me, Councellor, but 'Munkeyspanker'?" "That's Mister Munkeyspanker, yes." "Wha?" "Fuck me, Judge, don't ya know anything? |
|
24-07-03, 04:40 PM | #5 |
Queen of Sneak
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Astle
Posts: 2,813
|
All else aside TG...
Damn, I didn't make the cut!!
__________________
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸¸.·'´)¸.·'´) «¸¸©Jadesun¸¸» (¸.·'´(¸.·'´`'·.¸)`'·.¸) |
24-07-03, 06:38 PM | #6 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
Quote:
think i'd start by immediately transferring all assets to some trusted family member |
|
24-07-03, 06:41 PM | #7 |
yea, it's me.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 2,093
|
One could also file bankrupcy right quick..............
|
24-07-03, 06:42 PM | #8 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
Quote:
|
|
24-07-03, 06:46 PM | #9 |
yea, it's me.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 2,093
|
Well hell, I feel so much better now that we've at least got a defense plan
|
24-07-03, 08:19 PM | #10 | |
my name is Ranking Fullstop
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promontorium Tremendum
Posts: 4,391
|
from the zillions of articles on the subject, there comes a little optimism:
Quote:
it's a goldmine of publicity for any lawyer who wants to play David to the RIAA's Goliath...i'll bet there are more than a few who are willing to duke this thing out http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-07-23-riaa_x.htm |
|
24-07-03, 08:29 PM | #11 |
-
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,319
|
One of my friends, sweetgurl809, is looking at hard time here!
__________________
I’ve been a little down because today my doctor diagnosed me with John Travolta Syndrome. It’s a condition where your face or head grows laterally, getting wider year by year. It’s not so much of a problem and it’s nothing to be ashamed of, it’s just a condition. In fact mine is good because it means my brain is getting bigger too. But not that Travolta guy, his head is mostly fat. The doctors said I am much smarter than John Travolta and I believe them. |
25-07-03, 07:06 AM | #12 |
Semiblind
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,857
|
i noticed that there is
@kazaa @grokster @fileshare What is fileshare, and why is iMesh not in that list of people since i esh uses the same network... |
25-07-03, 02:58 PM | #13 | |
Queen of Sneak
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Astle
Posts: 2,813
|
Quote:
__________________
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸¸.·'´)¸.·'´) «¸¸©Jadesun¸¸» (¸.·'´(¸.·'´`'·.¸)`'·.¸) |
|
25-07-03, 03:44 PM | #14 | |
Alien In a Penguin Suit
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 265
|
Quote:
__________________
TheOnlyBob |
|
26-07-03, 05:13 AM | #15 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
EFF has opened an online database of subpoenad FastTrack users. By typing in your FastTrack username you can check whether you have been hit.
- tg |
27-07-03, 10:23 AM | #16 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
Hit by the copyright nazis? Two new info websites online
From Slyck:
A new organization has been set up to help users or ISPs that have received supbpoenas called the Subpoena Defense Alliance that will instruct users/ISPs how not to get sued by the RIAA and what to do if you have already been targeted by them. Another website, Chilling Effects, is maintaining information about Freedom of Speech and maintains a database of abuse of the subpoenas. Both websites are joint ventures supported by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and other public advocacy organizations along with a host of Universities. The websites are an encouraging sign that there is a growing tide of opposition to the new tactics being employed by the RIAA. The next step is questionable by the RIAA who has promised to sue thousands of file-sharing users. They have the names now of hundreds of users, but many have speculated that before any suing actually begins, the organizations working with the RIAA plan on doing thorough checks first to ensure that they are not suing any senators children or others who support them. So it may be some time before the lawsuites actually begin going out. However, if you are caught in the RIAA dragnet, you now have two new sources of information to help you battle the BULLY. Links: The Subpoena Defense Alliance Chilling Effects - tg |
27-07-03, 04:29 PM | #17 |
WAH!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 725
|
i hope i make the cut! at least i wouldn't settle like that pussy college kid (who was only running a search engine for the network no less!). I still can't believe people gave to his settlement fund! I mean, he settled! He admitted wrongdoing! Grrrr...
Of course, I don't use kazzaa... If they move on to certain bittorrent sites, irc channels or soulseek then i'll be good to go!
__________________
I hate hate haters |
28-07-03, 04:17 AM | #18 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
The Boston Globe:
Protecting privacy from the 'new spam' By Peter Swire, 7/27/2003 THE BATTLE is heating up between the recording industry and those who download copies of their favorite music. the Recording Industry Association of America is bringing hundreds of lawsuits nationwide against home users of peer- to-peer (P2P) software, including students at Boston College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah recently used a Senate hearing to suggest that copyright owners should be able to warn home users once or twice, and then actually destroy the computers if the apparently infringing songs were not removed. Overlooked in the heated rhetoric has been a victim of the RIAA's campaign - the privacy of all those who surf the Internet or send e-mail. On the RIAA view, your sensitive personal information on the Web would be available to anyone who can fill out a one-page form. Congress can and should step in to fix this problem immediately. The problem began in late 2002, when the RIAA demanded that Verizon Online, an Internet service provider, identify one of its customers based on an accusation that the person may have violated copyright laws by swapping files. Verizon declined, citing the threats to customer privacy, due process, and the First Amendment. Was Verizon overreacting? No. The new process starts when any website operator, recipient of an e-mail, or participant in a P2P network learns the Internet Protocol address of the home user. These IP addresses are automatically communicated by the nature of the Net, but until now only the ISP could usually match an IP address with a user's identity. When a copyright holder fills out a one-page form, however, a federal court clerk must now immediately issue a subpoena. That subpoena orders the ISP to turn over the name, home address, and phone number that matches the IP address. This procedure violates due process. There is no judicial oversight and only the flimsiest showing of cause. Furthermore, Internet service providers risk large penalties if they even question the validity of a subpoena. Privacy is destroyed because it becomes so easy to reveal the identity of Internet users. The First Amendment is undermined because of the chilling effect if every e- mail and every post to a Web page can be quickly tracked back to a home address and phone number. The early use of these subpoenas has shown startling mistakes by copyright holders. One recording industry subpoena this spring - based on a patently incorrect allegation - nearly closed down a college astronomy department's Web server in the middle of exam week. A major studio has sought a subpoena based on the careless assertion that a tiny computer file was a copy of a Harry Potter movie. (It was a child's book report instead.) An even greater risk is putting this subpoena power in the hands of anyone willing to pretend to have a copyright claim. These fraudulent requests will be impossible to distinguish from legitimate ones. This flood of legally sanctioned harassment will quickly become the ''new spam,'' with the kinds of abuses as limitless as the Internet itself: The most common use may be that of website operators who want to identify their visitors for marketing purposes or for more nefarious reasons, including identity theft, fraud, or stalking. Porn sites and gambling sites could track down visitors and demand payment not to reveal the user's identity, all under the pretext of enforcing the site's ''copyright.'' Private investigators will gain an unstoppable way to turn an e-mail address into a person's name and physical address. Fortunately, a better alternative is clear. Courts have already used ''John Doe'' procedures where one party tries to learn the name of an anonymous Internet user. In these cases, users can object (anonymously) to having their identity revealed. The judge looks at the facts. If the person is engaged in illegal piracy, then the judge reveals the name and orders effective sanctions. If the copyright holder or scam artist does not have a winning case, then the user names remain private. John Doe legislation of this sort is being considered now in California and should become a priority in Congress as well. The RIAA lawsuits against users are beginning now, long before the appeal of the Verizon proceeding will be decided. Before the ''new spam'' proliferates, we should have fair procedures in place that will protect intellectual property while protecting privacy, free speech, and due process as well. Peter Swire is professor at the Moritz College of Law of the Ohio State University, and was the Clinton Administration's chief privacy counselor. This story ran on page E11 of the Boston Globe on 7/27/2003. |
29-07-03, 04:40 AM | #19 |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
Now you can search EFF's subpoena database also with your IP address. This is quite useful as there may e.g. be many family members using p2p software with different nicks from the same IP address.
- tg |
29-07-03, 04:55 AM | #20 | |
yea, it's me.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 2,093
|
Quote:
also all us dynamic IP peeps had best keep a notepad handy and be sure to keep a log of renews each day not sure if the dial-upers are on the menu but better safe than sorry..........might as well keep a log of that too :S |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|