|
Peer to Peer The 3rd millenium technology! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
21-04-01, 01:12 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7
|
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/04/21/1319251.shtml
"Everyone has probably forgotten the SDMI challenge to hackers to try to break a handful of proposed watermarking and "other" protection mechanisms? Well, it was recognised that a group of researchers at Princeton University broke all of the protection mechanisms and were due to publish a paper on at the 4th International Information Hiding Workshop (25-29 April) but have been threatened with the DMCA if they publish the results. So much for academic freedom, eh? SDMI seem particularly upset because one of the protection mechanims broken in the paper, The Verance Watermark, is currently used for DVD-Audio and SDMI Phase I products. Oops. Somehow, a copy of the threatening letter and the full paper entitled "Reading Between the Lines: Lessons from the SDMI Challenge" has appeared on John Young's excellent Cryptome site. SMDI's urge to "withdraw the paper submitted for the upcoming Information Hiding Workshop, assure that it is removed from the Workshop distribution materials and destroyed, and avoid a public discussion of confidential information." seems a little weak now...." SDMI challenge FAQ: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/sip/sdmi/faq.html The paper: http://cryptome.org/sdmi-attack.htm ...... Hell yeah.
__________________
Malk-a-mite =================== Insert clever .sig file here =================== Last edited by Malk-a-mite : 21-04-01 at 01:12 PM. |
21-04-01, 07:42 PM | #2 | |
Madame Comrade
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Area 25
Posts: 5,587
|
Thanks for a very interesting update, Malk!
The paper itself was most interesting reading - a well-written scientific work that gave a good insight into the techniques that are currently being tried to produce digital watermarks of audio material. The final conclusions are worth quoting: Quote:
The technical results of the study give also a deeper symbolic lesson in regard to the whole idea and approach behind the effort: you can't really 'glue ownership' onto an audio wave that is meant to be public. The harder you try, the worse it starts to sound. - tg |
|
21-04-01, 10:57 PM | #3 | |
Just Draggin' Along
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,210
|
Quote:
I guess it was necessary for them to save face by being able to say "not all the technologies were compromised", even if it meant failing to provide adequate samples of the protected tracks and providing a faulty oracle. Wonder how long it's going to take them to understand they have a pipe dream type fantasy?
__________________
Copyright means the copy of the CD/DVD burned with no errors. I will never spend a another dime on content that I can’t use the way I please. If I can’t copy it to my hard drive and play it using the devices I want, when and where I want, I won’t be buying it. Period. They can all take their DRM, broadcast flags, rootkits, and Compact Discs that aren’t really compact discs and shove them up their bottom-lines. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|