View Single Post
Old 16-05-03, 02:58 AM   #3
multi
Thanks for being with arse
 
multi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The other side of the world
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Major Labels Caught Stealing $100m a Year
Record Clubs Get a Smack Upside the Head by Federal Judge
Moses Avalon

Artists and songwriters trying to track "lost sales" might want to look carefully in flea markets. This past month saw several busts at neighborhood swap meets. Vendors, using fake names and addresses, join record clubs, (the buy one CD and get 10 CDs for a buck companies) and take the 10 "premium" CDs and resell them at flea markets. Think this is small potatoes? This month a New Jersey scam was busted and confessed to redistributing almost 50,000 units in this manner. Most were from BMG and Columbia House Music Club (owned by Sony Music), the very same companies that lost a second important defeat in a class action suit by songwriters. (Ory v. Columbia House Music Club, Case No. CV 02-02342 SJO. Los Angeles)

On April 22, 2003, the U.S. District Court based in Los Angeles, dealt a serious blow to BMG and Sony, deciding that the two major-label-owned "record clubs" had no leg to stand on to get the case thrown out of court, and would have to attempt to prove to a jury that they just "forgot" or were really going to pay songwriters "when they got around to it."

The court found that the record clubs failed to pay for mechanical licenses on the premium records given away. (Roughly 6-8 cents per song, per copy sold.) Songwriters' lawyers estimate that the record clubs ripped off their clients to the tune of about $100 million dollars a year.

All this makes you wonder why the RIAA (who is funded by companies who own both major publishing houses and record clubs) scream bloody hell over Kazaa and Napster, and yet ignore this? Could it be to distract us from the fact that their constituents were actively involved in collusion that was costing artists and songwriters far more than the file-sharing services? Or were they just jealous that file sharing services were ripping off their artists better than the majors were.

Glass houses, people. Glass houses.

A trial has been set for January 13, 2004. Stay tuned. This is one to follow.
http://musicdish.com/mag/?id=8048
thats just one way they rip the songwriters off...
they are using p2p to blame for drop in sales ,after releasing less and less every year...i bet they fleece the songwriters and musicians for all they can get while cryin poor mouth...ie with the production costs for the recordings and clips...
and the crap ideas they are doing to the released media like the example
of my fellow melbournian...in that last story
i think everybody should boycott all the lables and all the musos should rip up their contracts...stop releasing for a year record a whole heap of stuff ......then sell them on the web
for reasonable prices..
if they do i will get some sort of account so i can buy a few tracks now and then...
__________________

i beat the internet
- the end boss is hard
multi is offline   Reply With Quote