Man Made Climate Change Advocates Say Challenge To Gore Film Is Huge Industrialist Conspiracy
Outrageous response to High Court's inconvenient ruling
Steve Watson
Advocates of the man made global warming theory have jumped on an article in yesterday's London Observer which insinuates that a recent court case which attempted to stop Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth being shown to school children in the UK is part of a vast conspiracy secretly being implemented by big industry insiders.
The Observer article, via a series of tenuous claims, suggests that the school governor, Stewart Dimmock, who challenged the screening of Al Gore's climate change documentary in secondary schools, calling it "tantamount to brainwashing", was funded by "a powerful network of business interests with close links to the fuel and mining lobbies."
The claim has seemingly arose from the fact that Mr Dimmock says he received some financial backing from a small Scotland-based political party which campaigns for lower taxes and the expanding nuclear power. The report also says Dimmock was backed by (gasp, shock, horror) "a local Conservative Party figure".
The Observer then claims that this Scotland-based party received some funding three years ago from a non-profit body called Scientific Alliance , composed of scientists and non-scientists, which aims to challenge many of the claims about man made global warming.
The Observer then makes a leap of faith by claiming that this group is linked to Exxon Mobil as it once co-authored a report, which questioned climate change claims, with the George C Marshall Institute, a US body that has been funded in the past by the energy giant Exxon Mobil.
Ever heard of the "you're only five steps away from any other person" theory? In short, advocates of man made climate change have decided that this series of unverified claims and distant links confirms that the kingpins of the big energy companies are involved in a secret plot to discredit Al Gore and his legion of man made global warming fans.
In truth, as the afore mentioned court case found , it is Al Gore's film itself that discredits the theory of man made global warming, as it is chock full of provable errors and junk science:
A British High Court judge this week exposed nine inaccuracies in former U.S. vice president Al Gore's award-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, labelling it "a political film" and calling many of its claims about climate change "alarmist" and "exaggerated."
Though it stopped short of preventing the film being shown in schools, the High Court ruled that the documentary would have to be screened with guidance notes because it is unbalanced. Perhaps the judge involved in the case also has some distant and tenuous link to someone who once knew someone who worked for an energy company?
We have previously shown that although the UN's IPCC and Gore's film claim that "a consensus" of all scientists endorse the man made warming theory, studies have shown that in truth less than half even tacitly endorse it.
We have also shown that the common charge that questioning the official orthodoxy of the global warming religion equates to acting as a stooge for the western establishment and big business interests is a complete reversal of the truth. In fact it is the high priests of the elite and kingpin oil men like chairman of British Petroleum, Peter Sutherland, that continue to fan the flames of global warming hysteria.
Global Warming is being used by established western industrial nations in conjunction with globalist groups such as the CFR, Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission, which are populated with heads of corporate industry, to place draconian restrictions upon developing countries and force up energy prices. Industrial globalists have everything to gain from perpetuating the man made theory, the logic that they would conspire against climate change advocates is impaired.
..More
(some of which is already posted above)