Quote:
Originally posted by assorted
What sucks is I doubt broadband is going to get any faster for $50 a month; and what you are describing sounds to me like the only way I could ever be interested in downloading films. However it would take forever to pull down 2.1 gigs per film...
|
Now that I do find interesting.
I found, for instance, on Direct Connect, a satellite connection from which I downloaded an mp3 at 70kb/s constant.
So, in theory, if we all had such connections (or better) and found that 200kb/s was the norm, then a 2.5GB download would be no real biggy, would it?
I've probably got another 35 years on this planet: I might just see real broadband yet.