[jcmd62]

Originally Posted by theknife

you miss the point, JC, try to stop ranting about Clinton this and Clinton that, coz nothing Clinton did or didn't do has anything to do with what has transpired in Iraq. in Iraq, Bush bears responsibility for it all, from a to z...and Rumsfeld too, by delegation.

Iraq a Bush/Rumsfeld/Cheney & Co operation... we didn't have to go in March '03 but we did solely coz a bunch of aging neocons simply couldn't contain their throbbing erections for Saddam Hussein any longer...
- so if we did it with a shitty plan, with poorly equipped troops, unprepared for what we got into, then who really fucked up here? your boys in the White House, that's who.

Wrong. Iraq is a UNITED STATES of AMERICA operation. As usual liberal rhetoric turns a few whiny idiots that are crying because they will now have to do the very jobs they volunteered, trained and accepted payment to do, a job who's expectations and dangers were fully explained in advance. Only a few select liberal sore losers and Monday morning quarterbacks like you are using hindsight to second guess the PRESIDENT on his plan of attack. Yes wouldn't we all go back and change mistakes IF we had the luxury of watching someone else make them first. This is the basis of every liberal argument.......what if????

We are the best equipped military in the world. Only a complete moron would turn a few crybaby's sobs into our troops being "poorly" equipped. Even more ignorant is this "unprepared" lie. The excellent job that our troops have done so far is testiment alone to just how well prepared we were and still are prepared to deal with diseases like Saddam.

Once again its you that refuses to take any credit for the 8 years you liberal cowards spent in one huge heads buried safely in the sand circle jerk with a leader who couldn't contain his throbbing erections for fat ugly chicks, and playing "joe" Celebrity on talk shows. 8 years Clinton did NOTHING when we were attacked by Terrorists. For 8 years he did NOTHING every time Saddam refused to allow inspectors access. Which directly affected the information gathering process that was to allow the current President and the FUTURE one that he knew full well would replace him to KNOW what Capabilities Saddam had or hadn't rebuilt/replaced.

Do you think Bush kept "No Fly" zones in place to just baby sit Saddam for the next 10 years? Hell no! Bush wanted to follow the murderer back to Baghdad and deal with him while we had the 3 times the forces, manpower, and equipment on the ground in Iraq/Kuwait than the weak military we were left with today after 8 years of liberal neglect. He only stopped the war after Saddam exited Kuwait to appease the world and especially the UN. He actively planned to take out Saddam and pushed for UN approval to do so the first time Saddam broke his UN agreement. No doubt we would have and SHOULD have dealt with Saddam a lot sooner than March 03 had Bush been re-elected.

Thats right narrow eyes see only the small picture that suits your fantasies. We didn't have to go in march 03, we could still be using the liberal " ignore it and hope like hell it goes away" process even though most of our ancestors learned before we populated this continent that this only made matters worse and was like ignoring an infection and letting it fester until it becomes gangrenous. History clearly has shown that ACTIONS speak louder than words and that apathy is NOT the way to stop another's aggression. Thank god the American people saw this and elected a President that understood this, and now re-elected him to finish the job.

If for no other reason Saddam was a boil that needed lancing long, long ago. Thanx to Mr. clinton and the UN Saddam was allowed 10+ more years of murder, sodomy, rape and crimes against humanity. Had complete freedom to finance and commit Terrorism abroad and against his own people.

I agree with you that this far into the conflict, IF and its a big IF, our troops are running short on equipment and ANYTHING else they need to operate as safely as possible then Bush is solely to blame because he has had more than enough time and manpower to have manufactured and be delivering these materials to our men as they are needed. I have a little brother and an 18 year old nephew over there, and neither confirm these complaints. No one is ever or will ever be "prepared" for the horrors of WAR. We take to battle what we "think" is needed and we "adapt" to every situation as it plays out.

I am sick of this liberal second guessing and hindsight screams of "I would have known better and done it different" after the fact. America re-elected Bush, get the fuck over it and join the team. History alone will dictate George W. Bush's performance as President as well as his performance in Iraq as our Commander in Chief.