Quote:
|
Originally Posted by albed
It's actually an example that Al Gore doesn't really have the concern for the environment that he claims or he wouldn't be abusing it to such an extraordinary degree, just as Jimmy Swaggart doesn't really believe god exists or he wouldn't be provoking his wrath.
|
Neither of those assertions are necessarily true at all in
the real world of course, but if such baseless assumptions help you cling to your bias and dysfunctional version of reality, that's your perogative.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by albed
...and your own claim that global warming can cause global cooling clearly shows just how unquestioning you in particular are.
|
That is not 'my claim,' it is a
theory. (You really just can't help spinning
everything can you?) I've not taken any position on its
truth, but you can't seem to help yourself from insisting I have, apparently, because you don't have a scrap of information to refute it and yet are still determined to deny it for reasons unknown to anyone save that you are 'not convinced.'
For future reference and based on track record, please know that
things which have or have not 'convinced albed' hold for me no redeemable value.
When you can
prove that this theorem is not true you will have lived up to the rather unlikely position of supreme authority on matters of the future of the environment which you ridiculously project. Until that time you are so much derisive chatter, mocking the the entire concept of man's affect on the environment based solely on your misguided feeling of superiority to any and all individuals who have any true interest in it, lumping these together as a single 'mindless' entity in order to maintain that delsuion.
In fact when you, or Mazer or Drakonix or anyone else who maintains anthropogenic climate changes are "not supported by science" can produce one bit of scientific evidence that conclusively
refutes it, (repeating variations of the phrase over and over doesn't count by the way), I will no longer assume we are merely listening to your
preferred beliefs ad nauseum and at that time I will revisit the unlikely assertion that you've managed to transcend science and draw a valid conclusion from an inconclusive set of data and get back to you.
Meanwhile, if you
really think the current quality and rate of increase of human industry can continue unchecked indefinitely without any environmental repercussions, I suggest you go sit in the garage with your car running for awhile and think about it some more.
Mazer, at last, the real villains are revealed! 