|
Originally Posted by jcmd62
Just like a foul mouthed racist french canadian breeder of hatred, another miniscule and totally bogus "story" from a bunch of armchair crash scene investigators gets her panties in a bunch and is more concrete "PROOF" of some huge conspiracy.
Your panties are in a bunch you American, canadian countrymen hating imp because you keep shoving your head up your ass without removing your panties first. Any minor pointless tidbit that comes close to knocking the US and you run with it like you found the Holy Fukin Grail.
A bunch of country bumpkin "EXPERTS" are going to second guess the NTSB and run around claiming they KNOW what a crash scene is SUPPOSED to look like, as if they have spent their lives investigating an overseeing EVERY airline crash as NTSB has. OMFG theres nothing but a hole in the ground, little bitty pieces of wreckage and bodys all ground up together with yards of dirt and earth. Yea you stupid fukin attention whores let's slam you into the earth at 500mph inside a metal meat grinder and lets see whats left of you.
A passenger jet is not an aerobatic airplane. It is ONLY capable of maintaining flight in an upright and fairly level attitude. If you shove one into a dive or roll an airliner over onto its back into a nose down attitude from 15 20 thousand feet or even less it will only take seconds for this airliner reach its stress limits and the wings will be the first to seperate from the aircraft as it reaches its "G force" limits with the fuselage breaking up immediately followed by the wings tearing off. Along with the wings coming off hundreds of gallons of Jet-A fuel is vaporized and ignited turning the plane into a fireball long before it hits the ground.
Yes a hole and miniscule debris is all thats left after an aircraft with that kind of mass and momentum slams into the ground at 500+ mph. If his aircraft was indeed rolled over onto its back and pile driven into the ground from more than few thousand feet the wings would have come off long before it hit the ground, and why the engine ended up 1800 feet into the woods. Jet engines aren't light and they don't "BOUNCE" more than a few feet if that. As for the genius Air Natl. Guard dude that claimed this engine bounced 1800 feet into the woods from a plane that damn near contacted the earth in a verticle decent, we see clearly why he isn't an NTSB crash scene investigator.
Bottom line is that The US had more than enough reason/evidence to believe that this aircraft posed a threat of terrorism as long as it flew and was controlled by the hijackers. The US government had a green light to shoot this airplane down and would have not hesitated doing so if the plane had not crashed when it did. They would have downed it and had NO reason to deny it. The government would have made the pilots that shot the jet down into prime time heros that saved the Capitol or White House, instead of the passengers that turned out to be the true heros by attempting to retake control of the plane. Clearly proven in Cell Phone calls and the cockpit voice recorder that was found where "there was no airplane"?
Flight 93: Mayor of Shanksville Says 'There Was No Plane'
American Free Press | September 19 2004
American Free Press visited Somerset County to look into some of the questions surrounding United Airlines Flight 93, which allegedly turned over and crashed in a refilled strip mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville, Pa., taking 44 lives with it.
Many local residents believe the plane was shot down, which they say would explain why parts of the plane and its contents were found strewn over a large area.
One question, “is what happened to the physical wreckage of the plane?”
“There was no plane,” Ernie Stull, mayor of Shanksville, told German television in March 2003:
“My sister and a good friend of mine were the first ones there,” Stull said. “They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here—and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”
“They had been sent here because of a crash, but there was no plane?” the reporter asked.
“No. Nothing. Only this hole.”
When AFP asked Stull about his comments, he disagreed about when he had gone to the crash site. “A day or two later,” Stull said, was about when he went to the site. But he reiterated the fact that they saw little evidence of a plane crash
This guy is a gem of an idiot. Obvoiusly any inbred moron can be elected Mayor of Skanksville. One sentence their claiming..........
"parts of the plane and its contents were found strewn over a large area."
.....and the next "Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”"
NO PLANE?
It doesn't take an NTSB expert to compare this to the Pan Am that fell on Lockerbie. This 747 was "shot down" basically, broke into several pieces during the fall and evacuated lots of passengers and debris before the flaming wreckage "fell" to the ground. Leaving large pieces of airplane and hundreds of burnt bodies, ONLY because this plane FELL to earth and wasn't FLOWN into the ground at 500+ mph. Even with this aircraft breaking up at 35000 feet the majority of the plane broke up and fell directly onto Lockerbie with only the nose section landing away from the main crash scene when it seperated during the initial explosion. So much for that armchair theory about debris being strewn over a large area PROOF that the plane was shot down.
Of course Mayor Dumbass's idea of a large area is a cornfield and an engine 1800 feet away. Somebody must've shot this plane down for wreckage to spread out like that, somebody get them NTSB boys back here I dun solved their case.
|