Quote:
Originally posted by willow
That invalidates one of the oldest arguments.
"If there was plenty of music available, and I could afford it, I'd pay".
So what you are in effect saying is this; whilst it is possible to get something for free, you'll continue to do so, even if paying for it doesn't cost much ?
That doesn't sound like much of an incentive for the RIAA to back down, does it ?
|
That is the reality of p2p filesharing. The free acess of mp3 has long set the standard of how much people will pay for downloading mp3's online. My point is, one penny is more than people would pay for mp3's as long as files are available and the only cost is a connection to the internet.
As for thye RIAA, they seek total control of whats floating out there anyway. They are not in the compromising game as shown by their lawsuits over the past few years.