okay this does sound much more interesting now that you've explained it a little more fully so that even i could get it.
okay i like your explanation...now let me play "devil's advocate" what if you are in the minority as far as bandwidth is concerned for whatever reasons whether they be "socio-enoconic" or "lack of availablity" to higher speed accesses in your area...wouldn't such "controls" (bandwidth sharing, queue-control) be "wasted" on such users...and not really matter at all?
just would appear that maybe this "proposed p2p standard" you are suggesting...would alienate many users?