No big suprise about the cost overrun there, the man (bush) is spending our money like the proverbial drunken sailor, all for the sake of sticking it to the Dem's. The only reason to retain him is that there is no one else who has the balls to stand up to this nations enemies.
There is only one consolation, the Dem's would be even worse than Bush when it comes to money, and would be so weak on defense that it leaves me cold.
The Times is a bastion of the Left, I am not suprised they would run that story though I would take it with a grain of salt till it can be proven from another source or two. Foster may have a real case here however, I hope not, but would not be too suprised.
|