View Single Post
Old 01-02-07, 07:29 PM   #27
RDixon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,742
Default

President Bush: “The main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t.”

You can see this at:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea.../20060821.html

The Iraq Survey Group, headed by General Dayton, set up by the intelligence department within the Pentagon, whose final report says, “While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter.” The report also mentions that there is no proof that WMDs were sent to Syria. You can Google the report.

Even General Colin Powell has admitted that his presentation to the UN to justify the war turned out to be totally false. He now says it was the biggest mistake of his career.

Then, of course, there are the reports of the UN weapons inspectors who told us before the war that Iraq had no WMDs.

I challenge you to provide credible documentation that disputes the President, the ISG, the UN and General Powell’s admissions that Iraq did not have WMDs.

If you succede I will give consideration to the rest of your assertations and discredit them too...
RDixon is offline   Reply With Quote