these so-called ''john doe'' subpoenas take some amount of time to work through the various legal proceeedings to get to the point where an actual paper is delivered to a defendant. the date of alleged violations have to be specified by the petitioner of course and while i'd doubt they'd go back very far they will go back a bit, to when the boy was 11 say, possibly even 10. the article didn't make it exactly clear but yes, he wouldn't be 10 anymore.
- js.
|