View Single Post
Old 16-04-04, 06:07 AM   #34
AweShucks
Just Looking Around
 
AweShucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Right here!!!
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by miss_silver
lol


Like I said earlier, it's amazing that a 300$ camcorder can do a better job filming true event than security cam at the pentagone

The majority of security camera's in use do not shoot continuous like a camcorder which shoots as much as 30 "give or take a few" frames per second. Security cameras tend to shoot on selected intervals to save on film etc. Take gas stations for example the camera's in use there may only snap a picture once every ten seconds. Just because the monitor inside looks real time and smooth only a few frames are recorded. Assuming the pentagon had a rather high tech security camera I would still doubt if it shot more than 3-5 frames per second. So played back at real time the picture would most likely be very choppy or appear to miss frames.
They're not looking to make home video's to sit down and watch with the kids.
__________________
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." - Thomas Jefferson
AweShucks is offline   Reply With Quote