[malvachat]

Good posting mate.
At least no name calling.
I'm not sure what to believe to be honest.
I am a time-served steel fabricator,
with 30 yrs of working with of steel and some of the theorys shown
in that report stretch things a lot.
Yes,it can be proofed that under certain conditions,
it's possible that the buildings went down as the report says.
But the variables are huge.
Then to have 7 go the same way and have the"Pull it" phrase used,
in whatever capacity just adds doubt to the story.
Along with lots of other irritating things that keep on poping up.
The money thing,"The passport" Bush saying he saw the first plane.
Norad standing down.The doubts about the Pentagon attack.
There are so many unanswered questions.

For the record.
I'm not sure the USA government was behind the attacks,but Confident
it knows I lot more than what they're admitting to.
I don't dislike America.
I do distrust their government.
I think we all have good reason too as well.

Oh here's a thing, I was watching the video of both planes crashing the other day.A fraction of a second before both contacts there's a flash of some sort.Only one angle on the first but four on the second.I can't think what it could possibly be.Have you any ideas? before we speculate a bit more.Reflection is ruled out because it shows on every angle.
You look yourself.What do you think it is?

My thoughts are like this,if "Jacko"gets off on the grounds of reasonable doubt,and he admitted he likes sleeping with little boys in his bed.
Then there has to be enough reasonable doubt to open all the files,
and find out exactly what the government knows or doesn't know.