hmmm....SA_Dave (forgive me i keep wanting to call you "super dave" for some reason) i might be guilty of misunderstanding your post....but here i go again...(hehe...not understanding has never stopped me before so i will proceed)
okay i see what you mean about DNS companies like "deerfield" (dns2go.com) etcetera being open to
intimidation by the
various and sometimes "nefarious" parties that are interested in routing out this new scourge called "p2p"
okay so what about letting the "supernodes" do the "dns" work for us? (how? i dunno) maybe that was what you mean by 'dynamic host caches' if it wasn't can you please explain what is meant by "
dynamic host caches" as i am
not familiar with that term.
wow..that wasn't so as bad as i thought it was gonna be.
thanks,
kento
