When Kerry gets asked a hard question....
Why is it that he can only answer, "let the voters decide".
(hard ball tonite w/ Cris Mathews). I pretty much made up my mind to go with the Warrior. However I thought I'd be wise to at least listen to Kerry. Sorry, he doesn't do anything for me. Sounds worse than Clinton. His rich french wife won't even post her income tax return for this year. Even Hilary did that. Kerry's wife married into the Heinz money. And Kerry married into her dead husband's bucks. What is the meaning of is...? sounds like the whole campaign. |
|
All I see him do when asked a tough question is say: "That's not important...Look at Bush. He did blah blah blah....".
He's got too much recorded on video. Seems every time he says something about where he stands an old video clip surfaces of him saying the opposite. |
even if kerry was the antichrist you just couldn't consider voting for dubya, he's been clearly exposed as the idiot son of an asshole.
|
If Kerry was the Antichrist I'd be all the more enthused about voting for him. ...I mean we tried The Christ and that sucked.
[rimshot] As long as we're judging the candidates by their ability to answer tough questions here, let's remember Bush has an inability to answer them, a luxury no contender could support. Some recent examples of Bush hitting the tough-answer-ball out of the park: "I'm sure something will pop into my head here in the midst of this press conference, with all the pressure of trying to come up with an answer, but it hadn't yet. You just put me under the spot here, and maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one." Honest ignorance or evil genius? Both? Further, Bush enjoys being in a position where his supporters don't want or need him to answer tough questions, because they know good and well there's no justification or excuse for his actions and policies anyway and they don't want any damned acknowledgment of logic spoiling the party. We have, as in every election in living memory, two choices: Change or More of the Same, and as usual the Official Change candidate is More of the Same. Still, I'll vote for Change because I subscribe to the simple idea that in this Peter-Principled Muppet Show we should never give any of these perverts more than four years. Plus, if we keep the turnover rate at full throttle, the odds are more in our favor that one of them might eventually turn out to be human. ...OK, I'll admit that's ridiculously idealistic. |
Quote:
Down the rabbit-hole, Alice in wonderland I know what you're thinking, 'cause right now I'm thinking the same thing. Actually, I've been thinking it ever since I got here: Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill?:no: The matrix |
while Kerry is the presumptive nominee, there are faint rumblings of a "Dump Kerry" movement in the works. his performance on the campaign trail is lackluster, at best, and lots of the Dem establishment is nervous about his prospects. for example:
Quote:
|
Quote:
after that rant I was expecting a hottie [picture]. |
Quote:
I agree 100% with what RAS wrote, it is idealistic, but shouldn't we try for good changes? |
Idealistic? Just change it and hope it gets better?
Idealism is getting pretty lame. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't want or need an option, so I can hardly expect you to empathize with how miserable that option is, or to how it is still more desirable in spite of its miserableness. However, lol, calling my idealism lame when the only options given me are dumb and dumber is sort of like whacking me with your own crutch. :) |
Once again its all about you...in your own mind. Notice that my post was after Nicobie's with his own use of "idealistic". And the complete sentence:
Quote:
You need to realize your not the center of everyone's universe. Quote:
|
Quote:
- js. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)