Come on now,he's one of gods creatures.
Not a very nice one granted,but still.

LOL
:CG:
thats a tough one.. could spawn of Satan actualy be considered one of God's creatures at all ?

;)

what is it around here anyway? anytime certain people get pissed they drag out the yur gay nonsense. the only people i know pissed at gays are those afraid they may be gay themselves. whether somebody is or isn't is irrelevent. we're lucky they're a member. grow up. nobody freaking cares.

- js.

did I say something wrong?
;)

not you multi. you don't post drive-bys flaming people about their bedroom behaviour.

- js.

It's actually more of a screening process for friends who talk a lot of shit, but on receiving an invitation along with the typical results, show their true nature.

There's a world of difference between hetero males and homos; heteros seldom know the actual size of each others testes, so we judge each other on character alone, and maybe physical abilities.

I just wanted to make a comment on this.

I'm not supporting flaming, hurling personal level insults and/or vulgarity does not make a particular point of discussion stronger.

I'm not supporting what is sometimes called "gay bashing" either. I believe what people do behind closed doors is their own business.

I will however point out that if bedroom behavior is confined to the bedroom, it is not made public and thus does not become subject to public scrutiny or discussion.

If a person chooses to make his or her bedroom behavior public, that person must be prepared to accept public reactions, some of which might not be sympathetic or supportive.

A choice was made.

Why don't you try to be an unbigoted whiner and complain about how I drag out drug and alcohol abuse to bash people, or their religious beliefs, or their obvious low intelligence?

The fact that homosexuality alone bothers you reveals something. Some kind of sex obsession.

its all intro-spective :D

whether or not your thoughts are regularly swayed by the presence of organic or synthetic compounds your sleeping partner certainly has little to do with a discussion about privatizing nasa, unless he or she has a personal stake in the outcome.

- js.

First of all, let's be clear and not confuse 'bedroom behavior' with the acknowledgment of preference. I've made my preference(s) a matter of public knowledge, yes, but never my 'bedroom behavior.' You may thank your lucky stars for this, as I thank mine that you do not regale me with lurid tales from your boudoir.

Interesting that no one ever seems compelled to issue such deeply thoughful warnings to heterosexuals, who quite commonly make their simple preference known as a matter of course and are rarely accused of dragging unwilling spectators into their bedrooms as a result.

For instance, when you recently posted a list of affectionate names for the human female breast (including my favorite, "Weapons of Mass Turbation"), I inferred, perhaps unduly, that your preference is probably for female sexual partners and lost absolutely no sleep over it. You might protest that this example is too ambiguous to be counted as you having 'made a choice' to make a 'public announcement of your sexual preference,' but then there's no reason for you to give such a thing a second thought, is there? In fact heterosexuals make their preference known with great frequency and transparency and with lesser or greater consciousness of it--and there's no reason they shouldn't, it's part of what they are.

In fact, it's likely I might be accused now, as I have been before, of 'going on and on about my sexuality' when in fact I've simply been drawn into a discussion about and predicated on other people's sexuality--and some might not so readily see that albed, for instance, by putting down my sexuality, is really 'going on and on' about his own.

So, your assessment, while well-intentioned and clearly not a product of conscious sexual bigotry, seems nonetheless to embody a double standard. It really is a polite suggestion that thoughtful homosexuals (or, in my case, bisexuals) might prefer to tiptoe about quietly, lest they should wake the sleeping mother of collective conscience and incur her grumblings.

Yes, I made a choice, as you imply, to be either honest or dishonest. In most communities heterosexuality is so ubiquitous it is assumed one is heterosexual until 'proven guilty,' therefor I suppose it would be a relatively simple affair to fly under the radar if one wished to pursue and explore this option of being dishonest indefinitely.

...Or would it? For instance, should I avoid all conversations dealing with sexuality at large in an attempt to appear safely asexual, or should I be more aggressive and lie overtly, pretending to like only girls when the topic comes up? Choices, choices...

Given the choice over again I'm sure I'd make the same one in spite of the fact that some might claim it makes me somehow responsible for whatever attempts at abuse come my way--or somehow, however equivocally, justifies such attempts.

I can only hope the same standard would not be offered to, say, a black person who was on the recieving end of racist epithets and slurs. They might be a good deal more offended than I am by being told it was their choice and that they might've avoided it by trying to appear caucasian.

At any rate, I'm big enough to handle it, so don't concern yourself. Generally I find that when I consider the source, the 'unsympathetic and unsupportive' feedback about my sexuality only makes me chuckle.

Of course pathological adolescents are common to just about every forum and all across the internet; those who seem to imagine that their ability to fire off stereotypical schoolyard-caliber insults and then slink away passes for some kind of wisdom.

Concerning albed, as he himself points out, he's not above using any other kind of stereotyping information in his attempts to 'discredit' people and thereby sleazily avoid actual intelligible dialogue about whatever subject is at hand. No reason for me to feel special. And of course 'intelligible dialogue' seems to be something he is entirely incapable of anyway, so I assume this is no great loss.

Leave it to a windbag like Ramona to "blow" a brief comment into an essay on psychoanalysis--oops, did I demean his sexual behaviour again? Darn!



http://www.p2p-zone.com/underground/...9&postcount=22
Did you think that gave you credibility, or were you just bragging? You've seemed far more interested over the years in revealing your own sexual preference than other people were in hearing about it. But that's just consistent with your own overwhelming interest in yourself.

I could do a really big, wordy post on your odd behaviour, but I really don't give a shit.

First of all, in referring to my 'essay on psychoanalysis' I assume you're talking about the few sentences of my post wherein your psychotic behavior is mentioned. I hardly feel this comprises an essay, but I suppose to someone of your intelligence the concepts might seem dauntingly complex. Obviously you were unable to comprehend the larger point of the post but that's fine, had it been intended for your understanding I would've used much smaller words and possibly drawn some pictures.

I seriously doubt that you could. I've never seen you make a 'big wordy post' about anything.

While it's quite clear that you seem to think that your constant chihuahua-like yapping at the heels of some of the most intelligent members of this forum has some kind of gravity or eloquence, my advice would be to stick to your one-liner movie reviews and knee-jerk dismissals of topics over your head, or, in short, just keep pretending you're above it all and save yourself the effort, which in your case I'm sure would be considerable.

But I can see you don't really need this advice, you're already the master of the technique:

Of course. We're to assume that not giving a shit is why you just had to search up a four year old post, a post you must have remembered for four years in order to even be able to find it? My, that's quite an impression to carry around for something you don't give a shit about.

I also do not mention the gender of the marine in question, so it's your imagination that I was revealing a particular sexual preference. And the fact that you can even imagine that I might've made this little joke 'to give myself credibility' is just fucking weird. Talk about a potential psychoanalytic essay...

If one takes the time to explain their position in 'big wordy posts' they don't have to worry about their credibility. It's there for anyone to see.

Clearly this is why you on the other hand are so obsessed with the concept.

I noticed that.
Does that matter?

this man takes his shit seriously...

:AP:

:CE: