Human race will 'split into two different species'
The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist.
100,000 years into the future, sexual selection will mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed. The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000. ...more |
Pure fantasizing without a bit of data or even a hypothesis; it's just going to happen. "Top scientist" hah.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Morlocks rule!
|
looks like we'll probably need a separate forum section for those of you who wind up in the underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures. i'll talk to Gaz.
|
I tend to agree with a theory put forward by Larry Niven on this subject. He suggested that human nature precludes human evolution as the strongest people tend to hazard death in wars to protect those too weak to fight, usually before they've had a chance to add their superior genes to the pool.
|
Wars are seldom very devastating to a population, historical casuality numbers are almost always vastly exaggerated and civilians often fare worse than soldiers. So I'd flush that theory.
Biotechnology will probably steer human evolution in the future imo. Designer babies for the wealthy at first and then for the middle class as it becomes more affordable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
But it's halloween; oh well, the prince valiant look will suit you well enough I suppose.
ga-ay |
Quote:
|
Nonsense. You're just as bad as that "top scientist" with no evidence or explanation, just your pronouncement. And biotechnology certainly isn't a "social force" so you're already contradicting yourself.
Society has little or nothing to do with reproduction, it's a fairly personal choice made mostly by women imo, at least in advanced, liberal countries with birth control options. And they're still driven by animal instinct from what I can determine, so they're still selecting for looks, health, wealth, etc. even when it's from a sperm bank. So I really don't see any "social" forces at work. But feel free to elaborate. |
'advanced', liberal countries?
Wouldn't that would be a contradiction of terms for you albed? Or maybe you are saying there needs to be a balance of liberal and conservative to attain the status of 'advanced' country? |
It's easy to be optimistic when you are predicting something that is 100,000 years in the future.
I don't see any humans around after a few hundred years. Hell, there may not be any of us left alive after just the next 50 years. I do see a strange looking metalic thing that is saying "bite my shiny metal ass" and "kill all humans". |
Don't be so slow...........
Hasn't that already happened?
And how will mother nature deal with it. :PE: |
Quote:
Quote:
You're trying to convince me that attraction is the only factor in reproduction because attraction is a product of instinct while society is not, but you're wrong. Societies occur in most classes of vertebrates and in many arthropods, the vast majority of which behave solely out of instinct because they lack the capacity for emotion and intellect. You'll find societies in animals ranging from lions to ants. So society is a product of instinct and as such its purpose is to enhance reproductivity. Like most people you've gotten into the habit of equating sex and reproduction, but because of birth control we don't have to apply that kind of thinking to ourselves. People use contraceptives when they want to fuck, not when they want to mate. Humans and animals alike fuck out of instinct, but for humans reproduction is a conscious choice. And because we are social creatures our reproductive decisions are deeply affected by social pressure. I wasn't contradicting myself by saying biotechnology is a social force because I didn't say that biotechnology is a social force. I did say that it is one of many processes that has superseded natural selection and that it is a result of social forcings. |
You guys use fucking 'liberal' in one breath as discription of a blight on your precious economy, a scourge on progress ,a political bent held by crazies whos fucked up ideas are a constant drain on society. Then you tell me that it means 'free'?
To me it means the conservatives in this country. It's the one aspect of democracy and freedom that you love to enforce on the rest of the world.. but it's bullshit. It was once 'free' built on the ideas of 'free' men, but all that has changed. Thats what people hate about you conservatives , you take all that is good in the world and suck it up for all it's worth then regurgitate it as some hideous represtentaion of what it once was. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hahahahahahahahaahhaa... what a dillweed. :PE: |
go fuck a pushbike.. :f:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)