10 Reasons why GWB could be a tyrant
by Sherwood Ross
As public sentiment begins to build for impeachment, it might be illuminating to examine the many ways President Bush operates in a manner reminiscent of history's tyrants. Here are 10 areas that come readily to mind.
|
"Wrongdoing of this magnitude does not happen by accident"
Quote:
|
lift up any rock in the Bush administration and something slimy crawls out. this is what government looks like when it is run by people who do not believe in government. the GOP will wear this albatross around their necks for at least the next election cycle, if not beyond.
|
cue the anti-copy/paste police in ...3...2...1
:pflag: |
Nothing wrong with copy/paste per se. It has a limitation though. The words and the opinions are those of the article writer, not the poster.
[Yawn] Is this where I’m supposed to be baited into doing hours of research, then spend more time composing a post containing the results, so you can poo-poo it by saying I’m a “Bush bot” or something like that? No, Thank You. |
Quote:
|
That was judgemental and purposeful on my part.
I just thought that [Yawn] looked cleaner than [Yawn][/Yawn] and still communicated what I wanted it to. |
:hystery: Mayberry Machiavellis :shk: :hystery:
Quote:
Of course I realize when liberals agree with each other it's only because they're parrots, but when conservatives agree with each other it's due to their profound intellectual scope, exceptional moral rectitude and laser-sharp insight leading them, completely independently, to the same conclusions. :CE: Quote:
:W: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let's see you prove that the Bush Administration is actually comprised of "a giant pile of flaming dogshit". I do not have to do any research to prove that this is just a poisonous opinionated comment by you - it's self-evident. If you really hate Bush that much I suppose you could convert to Islam and go join al-Qaeda. I really wouldn't recommend that, though. Super hyperbolic statements laced with sarcastic comments and insults do not form the basis for an effective discussion or debate. Again: No, Thank You. |
Lol
Quote:
:sarc: |
Bush is a blathering idiot; unfit for command.
This is not an opinion. This statement is supported by more than 6 years of observing the man, his words, and his actions. |
It's still an opinion retard.
|
I suppose to someone even stupider than Bush that statement of fact would appear to be opinion, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt...
Prove it is opinion. Support what you say. Point out to us things which Bush has done that contradict what I said. What has Bush did, ever, that wasn't wrong or just plain dumb. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Islam and al-Qaeda are "sub-human" and "terrorists", then why is Nancy Pelosi violating the Logan Act to go chat with them? Why is the Democratic Party trying to appease them? Quote:
Support what you say. Hyperbole, sarcasm, poisonous comments and insults are by nature non-factual and are unacceptable as supporting factual information. |
[quote=Ramona_A_Stone;256131]
Of course I realize when liberals agree with each other it's only because they're parrots, but when conservatives agree with each other it's due to their profound intellectual scope, exceptional moral rectitude and laser-sharp insight leading them, completely independently, to the same conclusions. [quote] :scared: Could this be true? :scared: :PE: :still_waiting_for_the_dzncin'_donkeys: :PE: |
who cares about opinions ..it is beside the point
it's again just the usual lame attempt to drag the facts presented off topic that give pretty good reasons to not trust the current US admin ,the tyrant label might be a bit harsh but all these aspects don't add up in a good way. |
The tyrant label is opinion, multi. I won't make any comments on the particulars (we've already discussed every issue you've mentioned here) but Sherwood Ross has his own idea about the definition of that word, and in his opinion Bush's status as tyrant qualifies him for impeachment. But we don't impeach presidents just because we don't like them, we do it when they've broken the law. Scandal has haunted every administration and it always will. The scandals only persist because every president has had critics, but few presidents have actually broken the law so the scandals matter very little. Bush's critics can say whatever they want about him, and for the sake of the first amendment they should, but unless somebody has proof that Bush has broken the law then the criticism is just opinion, nothing more.
|
If we're going to drag the thread off topic we should start asking what's wrong with poor multi that compels him to constantly dredge up anti-Bush propaganda and repost it even though he lives about as far from Bush's influence as possible.
Could he have some personal obsession with the man like unrequited love or perhaps a past trauma caused by someone resembling Bush? Or maybe he's just parroting what others say simply to be accepted by a group and feel like he's cool. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)