Missing Explosives
 

Just one more reason in the long list of them to throw Bush out.

He really is pathetic, and won't take responsibility for undermanning Iraq.

Typical, everything is OK, Bush mentality. :zz2:

Asleep at the helm as usual......

hate to tell you this but i think i heard they(the explosives) have been there from before the recent iraq invasion...still dont make it ok ..
they were ment to guard them or destroy them or something..

probaly half of the recent truck bombs have been made from this stuff

GW's rebuttal to a Kerry attack about the missing explosives.

The decision to attack Iraq is important, and a president who jumps to conclusions without knowing all the facts is not the person you want as your commander in chief.

Russia tied to Iraq's missing arms


By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has learned.
John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, "almost certainly" removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...2637-6257r.htm


:dunno:

whatever i heard was apparently wrong...
rumsfeld sez:

I thought high gas prices was the only reason you needed.

Does the "long list" include spending too much money on the Iraq war so you can bitch about that and not spending enough to guard munitions depots at the same time and make your criticism fair and balanced.

That's right. Being a politician sucks, and Bush sucks well.

My criticism can be anything I want, I don't have to follow your blind, rigid republican induced agenda, so get over it, Mr. Bush clone.

:f: :f: :f: