New Thread
question..how many wars /skirmishes are going on in the world right now ?
question..what is the fightings about? question..Do you think it has to do with religon and over population and lack of resources for the world? We see what is called new growth when you move into your new subdivision the old growth nieghbours complain . The older growth nieghbours complain about the new grow nieghbours coming in and backing onto thier yards ..then the newest growth nieghbours complain about the next bunch. This is what I see in y lil town daily. Now try to imagine this on a global scale and not just in my town. Throw a lil religon into the mix (globaly). IMHO....Overpopulation /religon /stretching resources is the cuase of wars. How do we sovle it ... Any Ideas? :hflag: :PIR: :beer: |
Quote:
Increase technologies to ease the resource problem. .... and the final one has no answer. Monotheistic religions rather universally declare that there is only one god, and that all others are false. Hard to just "talk it out" when that is the starting point. |
Quote:
we find more planets to live on one planet for each religion |
Follow the money.
|
Blessed are the peacmakers
Quote:
|
I still think religion's purpose is to unite people, not to throw them into wars against each other. You can liken a religion to a loaded gun, but it still takes an individual to aim and fire that weapon. The people who abuse religion to foment wars are manipulative bastards, and the ones who get caught doing it should be tried for crimes against humanity. But you can't put a whole religion on trial, you can't tell all the members of a religion to stop practcing their faith. In the end all you can rightfully do is to try to convert members of volatile religions over to peaceful ones and try to teach people not to be so gullible.
Here's a fourth question to consider: are wars such bad things? My answer would usually be yes, but some might disagree. I guess you have to look at the circumstances surrounding each war individually and make a judgement because you can't just say that all wars are always bad. And even if you conclude that a given war is bad, sometimes the fastest way to end that war is to give one side the advantage. That must have been what the directors of the Manhattan Project decided when WWII was raging in the Pacific. They gave us the bomb, we used it to put an early end to the fighting. Then we helped rebuild Japan and we haven't nuked anybody since. Resources aren't the problem, using them efficiently is. Overpopulation isn't the problem, localized high population density is. To solve those problems border lines need to be erased so people can move freely to areas of low population density where resources are less in demand. Religion isn't the problem, fear of strangers is. But when you have no idea how to solve the real problems, it's easier to attack people's beliefs and their lifestyles and make blanket statements like "Religion and overpopulation and lack of resources are the causes of war." People are the only cause of war and it would be better to treat people like the fallible, fearful, sometimes stupid human beings they are than to point the finger at vague concepts that few people actually understand. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Try Buddhism. How many Buddhists have ever started a war?
Anyway, you're blaming an institution for the evils that people do. People don't need religion to be violent, any excuse will do. It's just that for some people religion is a convenient justification, while for people like you religion is a convenient scapegoat. I remember you stood up for me when my religious beliefs were attacked. Am I so different from everyone else that it's alright for me to have faith but it's not okay for anyone else? I won't endorse that. I have the God given privelage to believe what I want to believe, and so does everyone else. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are right, Blaming religion is a scape goat, should we blame the one who try to "guide" us through their religion? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Second, is it possible to attack ones religious institution without it being an attack on ones beliefs? Is it possible that the religion of man has made mistakes in trying to understand god's will? :) |
Quote:
http://www.ccsr.columbia.edu/population/map/ "Researchers at the Earth Institute at Columbia University have developed map that projects where people will be living in the year 2025." |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
It it certainly possible for people to mistake God's will, and I would venture to say that the better part of history has shown this to be true. People misinterpret their scriptures to mean that they should fight their neighbors, and often they do so on purpose. But when you attack a man's religion he's likely to take it personally even if he's just an innocent believer. While you can't legislate religious tollerance, you can make hateful acts illegal and punish the people who commit them without indicting their beliefs. When you punish a man for his beliefs you make him a martyr. So people must be judged by their actions and not their beliefs or else we risk turning otherwise peaceful people into violent enemies. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Note to self : When bottle of rum shows up ......do not post it politcal forum :edu: :o
Have always wondered this though ........ In the really really big picture of things?.........If there is a God and created the heavens and earth........Who created God so that God could do these things ? I`m looking at the creation side right now .....so who created God? Where did it ALL come from ? :beer: :dunno: :beer: |
Where is TG . . .
Lets get all this godShit out of here. It's just all crap that can't be proved. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)