Barack Obama impressive on The O'Reilly Factor
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkiRgCyCN0E Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpSxVdzQMW4 Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sGwY45HC0g Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAxdUFSmVxc I thought Obama was fairly successful at dispelling the notion held by many that he is a radical leftist bent on socializing the United States. Your thoughts? |
I agree, just so long as he doesn't go on Hannity and Blowjob..
Ð :S: |
Would have been better without that asshat O'Reilly.
|
It would not have been better without O'Reilly, and here's why. Obama, despite being a politician, has high standards for himself and when he says, "I expect to be held responsible for the things I say and do," I believe him. When O'Reilly put the screws to the senator he made him make unequivocal statements (most politicians try to avoid doing that). He probably went back to watch the broadcast to hear his own statements and, since avoiding the flip flop moniker is important to him, he's going to stand by his statements.
Here are a few things I heard Obama say during the interview:
Still, he couldn't concede the fact that the Bush tax cuts preceded an increase in federal revenue, and until he does I think he's not the right man for the job. |
I agree that the candidates need to be asked the hard questions and be made to give real answers. I still would rather someone besides O'Reilly ask the questions. I don't like O'Reilly. That's just my opinion.
|
Quote:
It's pathetic and shouldn't be put up with. Ð :S: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obama came from the corrupt Daly Chicago machine. Do any of U dillweeds pay attention? :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: :PE: |
I'd like to see Mcain on Oprera.
But I guess that would not be fair:pirc: :pirc: :pirc: :pirc: :pirc: :pirc: :pirc: :pirc: |
In my opinion Bill wanted to DEBATE rather than actually give a proper interview....
|
Quote:
Spell check still not working Nic?? |
i use opera and mccain's on it often. doesn't help tho, he's still a twit. :D
|
Quote:
|
It is a bad thing. O'Rielly isn't an investigative reporter, he's a hack looking to make himself look tough. He's not a journalist trying to get information out of the interview, but a bully playing up to his audience.
He's also a moron who knows nothing about economics, even something so simple a question as how the price of a barrel of oil is set: Quote:
Are you a 'typical American'? Ð :S: |
Quote:
this explains much. the advice? don't use logic with them, it simply makes it worse. save rational thought for those who are intellectually equipped to handle it, starting with undecided independents. - js. |
Quote:
not on chrome anyway.......... |
Quote:
O'Reilly is a typical (though famous and wealthy) American, of the kind that swarm polling places every election day. He asked questions that tens of millions of voters want answered. Acting as the voice of one half of the electorate O'Reilly did a fair job. He also played up to his audience, but Obama knew he would do that going in so props go to him for giving the interview (Hilary would never have had the guts to talk to O'Reilly for 3 minutes, let alone 30). |
The point being a journalist will give the subject time to answer and not step all over the interview. O'Reilly wasn't very interested in what Obama had to say. A shame really, as it could have been a good interview.
Ð :S: |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© www.p2p-zone.com - Napsterites - 2000 - 2024 (Contact grm1@iinet.net.au for all admin enquiries)